Cargando…

Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia

The aim was (1) to perform an up-to-date systematic review of the male circumcision (MC) literature and (2) to determine the number of adverse medical conditions prevented by early MC in Australia. Searches of PubMed using “circumcision” with 39 keywords and bibliography searches yielded 278 publica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Brian J., Katelaris, Athos, Blumenthal, Norman J., Hajoona, Mohamed, Sheen, Adrian C., Schrieber, Leslie, Lumbers, Eugenie R., Wodak, Alex D., Katelaris, Phillip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034719
http://dx.doi.org/10.31083/j.jomh1806132
_version_ 1784774827227217920
author Morris, Brian J.
Katelaris, Athos
Blumenthal, Norman J.
Hajoona, Mohamed
Sheen, Adrian C.
Schrieber, Leslie
Lumbers, Eugenie R.
Wodak, Alex D.
Katelaris, Phillip
author_facet Morris, Brian J.
Katelaris, Athos
Blumenthal, Norman J.
Hajoona, Mohamed
Sheen, Adrian C.
Schrieber, Leslie
Lumbers, Eugenie R.
Wodak, Alex D.
Katelaris, Phillip
author_sort Morris, Brian J.
collection PubMed
description The aim was (1) to perform an up-to-date systematic review of the male circumcision (MC) literature and (2) to determine the number of adverse medical conditions prevented by early MC in Australia. Searches of PubMed using “circumcision” with 39 keywords and bibliography searches yielded 278 publications meeting our inclusion criteria. Early MC provides immediate and lifetime benefits, including protection against: urinary tract infections, phimosis, inflammatory skin conditions, inferior penile hygiene, candidiasis, various STIs, and penile and prostate cancer. In female partners MC reduces risk of STIs and cervical cancer. A risk-benefit analysis found benefits exceeded procedural risks, which are predominantly minor, by approximately 200 to 1. It was estimated that more than 1 in 2 uncircumcised males will experience an adverse foreskin-related medical condition over their lifetime. An increase in early MC in Australia to mid-1950s prevalence of 85% from the current level of 18.75% would avoid 77,000 cases of infections and other adverse medical conditions over the lifetime for each annual birth cohort. Survey data, physiological measurements, and the anatomical location of penile sensory receptors responsible for sexual sensation indicate that MC has no detrimental effect on sexual function, sensitivity or pleasure. US studies found that early infant MC is cost saving. Evidence-based reviews by the AAP and CDC support early MC as a desirable public health measure. Although MC can be performed at any age, early MC maximizes benefits and minimises procedural risks. Parents should routinely be provided with accurate, up-to-date evidence-based information in an unbiased manner early in a pregnancy so that they have time to weigh benefits and risks of early MC and make an informed decision should they have a son. Parental choice should be respected. A well-trained competent practitioner is essential and local anaesthesia should be routinely used. Third party coverage of costs is advocated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94093392022-08-25 Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia Morris, Brian J. Katelaris, Athos Blumenthal, Norman J. Hajoona, Mohamed Sheen, Adrian C. Schrieber, Leslie Lumbers, Eugenie R. Wodak, Alex D. Katelaris, Phillip J Mens Health Article The aim was (1) to perform an up-to-date systematic review of the male circumcision (MC) literature and (2) to determine the number of adverse medical conditions prevented by early MC in Australia. Searches of PubMed using “circumcision” with 39 keywords and bibliography searches yielded 278 publications meeting our inclusion criteria. Early MC provides immediate and lifetime benefits, including protection against: urinary tract infections, phimosis, inflammatory skin conditions, inferior penile hygiene, candidiasis, various STIs, and penile and prostate cancer. In female partners MC reduces risk of STIs and cervical cancer. A risk-benefit analysis found benefits exceeded procedural risks, which are predominantly minor, by approximately 200 to 1. It was estimated that more than 1 in 2 uncircumcised males will experience an adverse foreskin-related medical condition over their lifetime. An increase in early MC in Australia to mid-1950s prevalence of 85% from the current level of 18.75% would avoid 77,000 cases of infections and other adverse medical conditions over the lifetime for each annual birth cohort. Survey data, physiological measurements, and the anatomical location of penile sensory receptors responsible for sexual sensation indicate that MC has no detrimental effect on sexual function, sensitivity or pleasure. US studies found that early infant MC is cost saving. Evidence-based reviews by the AAP and CDC support early MC as a desirable public health measure. Although MC can be performed at any age, early MC maximizes benefits and minimises procedural risks. Parents should routinely be provided with accurate, up-to-date evidence-based information in an unbiased manner early in a pregnancy so that they have time to weigh benefits and risks of early MC and make an informed decision should they have a son. Parental choice should be respected. A well-trained competent practitioner is essential and local anaesthesia should be routinely used. Third party coverage of costs is advocated. 2022 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9409339/ /pubmed/36034719 http://dx.doi.org/10.31083/j.jomh1806132 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Morris, Brian J.
Katelaris, Athos
Blumenthal, Norman J.
Hajoona, Mohamed
Sheen, Adrian C.
Schrieber, Leslie
Lumbers, Eugenie R.
Wodak, Alex D.
Katelaris, Phillip
Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia
title Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia
title_full Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia
title_fullStr Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia
title_short Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia
title_sort evidence-based circumcision policy for australia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034719
http://dx.doi.org/10.31083/j.jomh1806132
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisbrianj evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT katelarisathos evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT blumenthalnormanj evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT hajoonamohamed evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT sheenadrianc evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT schrieberleslie evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT lumberseugenier evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT wodakalexd evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia
AT katelarisphillip evidencebasedcircumcisionpolicyforaustralia