Cargando…

On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study

INTRODUCTION: Medical advancements are slow to reach the patient bedside due to issues with knowledge translation from preclinical studies. Multi-laboratory preclinical studies are a promising strategy for addressing the methodological deficiencies that weaken the translational impact of single labo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Jenna M., Peever, Alexander, Grudniewicz, Agnes, McDonald, Braedon, Mendelson, Asher A., Lalu, Manoj M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273077
_version_ 1784774871159406592
author Evans, Jenna M.
Peever, Alexander
Grudniewicz, Agnes
McDonald, Braedon
Mendelson, Asher A.
Lalu, Manoj M.
author_facet Evans, Jenna M.
Peever, Alexander
Grudniewicz, Agnes
McDonald, Braedon
Mendelson, Asher A.
Lalu, Manoj M.
author_sort Evans, Jenna M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Medical advancements are slow to reach the patient bedside due to issues with knowledge translation from preclinical studies. Multi-laboratory preclinical studies are a promising strategy for addressing the methodological deficiencies that weaken the translational impact of single laboratory findings. However, multi-laboratory preclinical studies are rare and difficult, requiring strong collaboration to plan and execute a shared protocol. In multiteam systems such as these, collaboration is enhanced when members have cohesive ways of thinking about their goals and how to achieve them–that is, when they have “shared mental models”. In this research project, we will examine how members of Canada’s first multi-laboratory preclinical study build shared mental models and collaborate in the execution of their study. METHODS: Six independent labs in Canada will conduct a preclinical study using a common protocol. To investigate mental models and collaboration in this multiteam system we will conduct a longitudinal qualitative study involving interviews at four time points, team observation, and document analysis. We will analyze interview transcripts using deductive coding to produce a matrix analysis of mental model content over time and inductive coding to produce a thematic analysis of members’ experiences of collaboration over time. We will also triangulate data sources to “tell the story” of teamwork, capturing events and contextual information that explain changes in mental models and collaboration over time. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the most comprehensive longitudinal analyses of a real-world multiteam system, and the first within a preclinical laboratory setting. The results will contribute to our understanding of collaboration in multiteam systems, an organizational form increasingly used to tackle complex scientific and social problems. The results will also inform the implementation of future multi-laboratory preclinical studies, enhancing the likelihood of effective collaboration and improved ‘bench to bedside’ translation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94095202022-08-26 On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study Evans, Jenna M. Peever, Alexander Grudniewicz, Agnes McDonald, Braedon Mendelson, Asher A. Lalu, Manoj M. PLoS One Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Medical advancements are slow to reach the patient bedside due to issues with knowledge translation from preclinical studies. Multi-laboratory preclinical studies are a promising strategy for addressing the methodological deficiencies that weaken the translational impact of single laboratory findings. However, multi-laboratory preclinical studies are rare and difficult, requiring strong collaboration to plan and execute a shared protocol. In multiteam systems such as these, collaboration is enhanced when members have cohesive ways of thinking about their goals and how to achieve them–that is, when they have “shared mental models”. In this research project, we will examine how members of Canada’s first multi-laboratory preclinical study build shared mental models and collaborate in the execution of their study. METHODS: Six independent labs in Canada will conduct a preclinical study using a common protocol. To investigate mental models and collaboration in this multiteam system we will conduct a longitudinal qualitative study involving interviews at four time points, team observation, and document analysis. We will analyze interview transcripts using deductive coding to produce a matrix analysis of mental model content over time and inductive coding to produce a thematic analysis of members’ experiences of collaboration over time. We will also triangulate data sources to “tell the story” of teamwork, capturing events and contextual information that explain changes in mental models and collaboration over time. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the most comprehensive longitudinal analyses of a real-world multiteam system, and the first within a preclinical laboratory setting. The results will contribute to our understanding of collaboration in multiteam systems, an organizational form increasingly used to tackle complex scientific and social problems. The results will also inform the implementation of future multi-laboratory preclinical studies, enhancing the likelihood of effective collaboration and improved ‘bench to bedside’ translation. Public Library of Science 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9409520/ /pubmed/36006928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273077 Text en © 2022 Evans et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Evans, Jenna M.
Peever, Alexander
Grudniewicz, Agnes
McDonald, Braedon
Mendelson, Asher A.
Lalu, Manoj M.
On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
title On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
title_full On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
title_fullStr On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
title_full_unstemmed On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
title_short On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
title_sort on the same page? a qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273077
work_keys_str_mv AT evansjennam onthesamepageaqualitativestudyprotocoloncollaborationinamultilaboratorypreclinicalstudy
AT peeveralexander onthesamepageaqualitativestudyprotocoloncollaborationinamultilaboratorypreclinicalstudy
AT grudniewiczagnes onthesamepageaqualitativestudyprotocoloncollaborationinamultilaboratorypreclinicalstudy
AT mcdonaldbraedon onthesamepageaqualitativestudyprotocoloncollaborationinamultilaboratorypreclinicalstudy
AT mendelsonashera onthesamepageaqualitativestudyprotocoloncollaborationinamultilaboratorypreclinicalstudy
AT lalumanojm onthesamepageaqualitativestudyprotocoloncollaborationinamultilaboratorypreclinicalstudy