Cargando…
Safety and performance of surgical adhesives
BACKGROUND: Tissue adhesives are an alternative to conventional surgical sutures to reduce the time and cost of wound closure and to improve patient comfort. The use of tissue adhesives does not require any subsequent intervention and significantly lowers the volume and rate of blood loss, and reduc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271531 |
_version_ | 1784774890947084288 |
---|---|
author | Szymanski, Lukasz Gołaszewska, Kamila Małkowska, Justyna Gołębiewska, Małgorzata Kaczyńska, Judyta Gromadka, Bartosz Matak, Damian |
author_facet | Szymanski, Lukasz Gołaszewska, Kamila Małkowska, Justyna Gołębiewska, Małgorzata Kaczyńska, Judyta Gromadka, Bartosz Matak, Damian |
author_sort | Szymanski, Lukasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tissue adhesives are an alternative to conventional surgical sutures to reduce the time and cost of wound closure and to improve patient comfort. The use of tissue adhesives does not require any subsequent intervention and significantly lowers the volume and rate of blood loss, and reduces the need for transfusions during and after surgery. However, based on their formulation, tissue adhesives’ safety profile and functional properties may differ. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the basic safety and performance of NE’X Glue® Surgical Sealant, BioGlue® Surgical Sealant, and PREVELEAK(TM) Surgical Sealant in vitro. METHODS: The basic safety of commercially available tissue adhesives was evaluated using MEM elution assay according to ISO 10993–5 and endotoxin level according to 85. USP. The in vitro performance was evaluated using lap-shear by tension loading test, burst strength test, degradation, and swelling assays. RESULTS: NE’X Glue®, BioGlue®, and PREVELEAK(TM) did not cause cytotoxicity in MEM elution assay. All surgical adhesives are below the general limit of endotoxin contamination of 20 EU/device. NE’X Glue® and BioGlue® showed the highest and comparable strength properties in lap shear and burst strength tests compared to PREVELEAK(TM). NE’X Glue® and PREVELEAK(TM) are characterized by lower degradation potential than BioGlue®. PREVELEAK(TM) is characterized by the highest swelling when compared to NE’X Glue® and BioGlue®. CONCLUSIONS: NE’X Glue® is most versatile in terms of functional properties while maintaining the same safety profile as BioGlue® and PREVELEAK(TM). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9409600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94096002022-08-26 Safety and performance of surgical adhesives Szymanski, Lukasz Gołaszewska, Kamila Małkowska, Justyna Gołębiewska, Małgorzata Kaczyńska, Judyta Gromadka, Bartosz Matak, Damian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tissue adhesives are an alternative to conventional surgical sutures to reduce the time and cost of wound closure and to improve patient comfort. The use of tissue adhesives does not require any subsequent intervention and significantly lowers the volume and rate of blood loss, and reduces the need for transfusions during and after surgery. However, based on their formulation, tissue adhesives’ safety profile and functional properties may differ. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the basic safety and performance of NE’X Glue® Surgical Sealant, BioGlue® Surgical Sealant, and PREVELEAK(TM) Surgical Sealant in vitro. METHODS: The basic safety of commercially available tissue adhesives was evaluated using MEM elution assay according to ISO 10993–5 and endotoxin level according to 85. USP. The in vitro performance was evaluated using lap-shear by tension loading test, burst strength test, degradation, and swelling assays. RESULTS: NE’X Glue®, BioGlue®, and PREVELEAK(TM) did not cause cytotoxicity in MEM elution assay. All surgical adhesives are below the general limit of endotoxin contamination of 20 EU/device. NE’X Glue® and BioGlue® showed the highest and comparable strength properties in lap shear and burst strength tests compared to PREVELEAK(TM). NE’X Glue® and PREVELEAK(TM) are characterized by lower degradation potential than BioGlue®. PREVELEAK(TM) is characterized by the highest swelling when compared to NE’X Glue® and BioGlue®. CONCLUSIONS: NE’X Glue® is most versatile in terms of functional properties while maintaining the same safety profile as BioGlue® and PREVELEAK(TM). Public Library of Science 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9409600/ /pubmed/36006958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271531 Text en © 2022 Szymanski et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Szymanski, Lukasz Gołaszewska, Kamila Małkowska, Justyna Gołębiewska, Małgorzata Kaczyńska, Judyta Gromadka, Bartosz Matak, Damian Safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
title | Safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
title_full | Safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
title_fullStr | Safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
title_short | Safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
title_sort | safety and performance of surgical adhesives |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szymanskilukasz safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives AT gołaszewskakamila safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives AT małkowskajustyna safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives AT gołebiewskamałgorzata safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives AT kaczynskajudyta safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives AT gromadkabartosz safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives AT matakdamian safetyandperformanceofsurgicaladhesives |