Cargando…

Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review

Background: So far, no medical treatment is available for cholesteatoma (C) and the only effective therapy is complete surgical removal, but recurrence is common even after surgical treatment. While C is classically divided into two clinical phenotypes, congenital and acquired, only a few studies ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cantone, Elena, Di Nola, Claudio, De Corso, Eugenio, Cavaliere, Michele, Grimaldi, Giusi, Fetoni, Anna Rita, Motta, Gaetano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081347
_version_ 1784774898491588608
author Cantone, Elena
Di Nola, Claudio
De Corso, Eugenio
Cavaliere, Michele
Grimaldi, Giusi
Fetoni, Anna Rita
Motta, Gaetano
author_facet Cantone, Elena
Di Nola, Claudio
De Corso, Eugenio
Cavaliere, Michele
Grimaldi, Giusi
Fetoni, Anna Rita
Motta, Gaetano
author_sort Cantone, Elena
collection PubMed
description Background: So far, no medical treatment is available for cholesteatoma (C) and the only effective therapy is complete surgical removal, but recurrence is common even after surgical treatment. While C is classically divided into two clinical phenotypes, congenital and acquired, only a few studies have focused on its potential biomarkers. This study aims to revise the literature to identify which biomarkers can define the endotype of C. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) process to identify published experimental articles about molecular biomarkers in C. Results: KGF and its receptor, MMP-9, KRT-1, KRT-10, and MIF might be considered biomarkers of recurrence, whereas Ki-67, TLR-4, RANKL, IL17, MMP-2, MMP-9, IL6, TNF-α, should be considered more specifically as biomarkers of bony erosion. Conclusions: These results are interesting especially from a prognostic point of view, nevertheless more studies are needed to search new biomarkers of C that could completely change not only the therapeutic standards of the disease, but also the clinical history of C itself in the era of precision medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94096312022-08-26 Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review Cantone, Elena Di Nola, Claudio De Corso, Eugenio Cavaliere, Michele Grimaldi, Giusi Fetoni, Anna Rita Motta, Gaetano J Pers Med Review Background: So far, no medical treatment is available for cholesteatoma (C) and the only effective therapy is complete surgical removal, but recurrence is common even after surgical treatment. While C is classically divided into two clinical phenotypes, congenital and acquired, only a few studies have focused on its potential biomarkers. This study aims to revise the literature to identify which biomarkers can define the endotype of C. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) process to identify published experimental articles about molecular biomarkers in C. Results: KGF and its receptor, MMP-9, KRT-1, KRT-10, and MIF might be considered biomarkers of recurrence, whereas Ki-67, TLR-4, RANKL, IL17, MMP-2, MMP-9, IL6, TNF-α, should be considered more specifically as biomarkers of bony erosion. Conclusions: These results are interesting especially from a prognostic point of view, nevertheless more studies are needed to search new biomarkers of C that could completely change not only the therapeutic standards of the disease, but also the clinical history of C itself in the era of precision medicine. MDPI 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9409631/ /pubmed/36013295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081347 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cantone, Elena
Di Nola, Claudio
De Corso, Eugenio
Cavaliere, Michele
Grimaldi, Giusi
Fetoni, Anna Rita
Motta, Gaetano
Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review
title Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review
title_full Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review
title_short Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review
title_sort endotyping of cholesteatoma: which molecular biomarkers? a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081347
work_keys_str_mv AT cantoneelena endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview
AT dinolaclaudio endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview
AT decorsoeugenio endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview
AT cavalieremichele endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview
AT grimaldigiusi endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview
AT fetoniannarita endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview
AT mottagaetano endotypingofcholesteatomawhichmolecularbiomarkersasystematicreview