Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic premalignant condition and is characterized by fibroblastic change of lamina propria and stiffness of oral mucosa. Though there are several treatment options available, the best agent is not yet identified. This study assessed the comparative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gopinath, Divya, Hui, Lai Mong, Veettil, Sajesh K., Balakrishnan Nair, Athira, Maharajan, Mari Kannan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081272
_version_ 1784774947264004096
author Gopinath, Divya
Hui, Lai Mong
Veettil, Sajesh K.
Balakrishnan Nair, Athira
Maharajan, Mari Kannan
author_facet Gopinath, Divya
Hui, Lai Mong
Veettil, Sajesh K.
Balakrishnan Nair, Athira
Maharajan, Mari Kannan
author_sort Gopinath, Divya
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic premalignant condition and is characterized by fibroblastic change of lamina propria and stiffness of oral mucosa. Though there are several treatment options available, the best agent is not yet identified. This study assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of medical interventions in the management of OSMF. Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of interventions for OSMF with each other, or placebo. A network meta-analysis was performed, and the interventions were ranked according to their efficacy based on the surface under the cumulative ranking. (PROSPERO Registration no: CRD42021255094). Results: Thirty-two RCTs comprising 2063 patients were eligible for quantitative analysis. In terms of therapeutic efficacy in the improvement of mouth opening Oxitard, a herbal formulation was ranked as the most efficacious agent, [MD, 10.29 (95%CI 6.34–14.25)] followed by combination therapy of Lycopene with corticosteroids and hyaluronidase [MD, 7.07 (95%CI 1.82–12.31)]. For improvement of burning sensation aloe vera was ranked first [MD, 6.14 (95%CI 4.58–7.70)] followed by corticosteroids with antioxidants [MD, 6.13 (95%CI 4.12–8.14)] and corticosteroids in combination with hyaluronidase with antioxidants [MD, 5.95 (95%CI 3.79–8.11)]. In terms of safety, most of the drugs were reported to cause mild adverse effects only. Significant inconsistencies could be identified in the analysis for both the outcomes assessed and were further explored. Conclusions: Our study highlighted the potential efficacy of several agents over placebo in the improvement of mouth opening and burning sensation in OSMF patients. However, the RCTs lacked methodological soundness. Well-designed studies with a larger number of participants with a rigorous randomization process and stringent methodology are recommended to strengthen the results obtained, which may help to construct a clinical guideline for OSMF management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94098322022-08-26 Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Gopinath, Divya Hui, Lai Mong Veettil, Sajesh K. Balakrishnan Nair, Athira Maharajan, Mari Kannan J Pers Med Review Introduction: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic premalignant condition and is characterized by fibroblastic change of lamina propria and stiffness of oral mucosa. Though there are several treatment options available, the best agent is not yet identified. This study assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of medical interventions in the management of OSMF. Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of interventions for OSMF with each other, or placebo. A network meta-analysis was performed, and the interventions were ranked according to their efficacy based on the surface under the cumulative ranking. (PROSPERO Registration no: CRD42021255094). Results: Thirty-two RCTs comprising 2063 patients were eligible for quantitative analysis. In terms of therapeutic efficacy in the improvement of mouth opening Oxitard, a herbal formulation was ranked as the most efficacious agent, [MD, 10.29 (95%CI 6.34–14.25)] followed by combination therapy of Lycopene with corticosteroids and hyaluronidase [MD, 7.07 (95%CI 1.82–12.31)]. For improvement of burning sensation aloe vera was ranked first [MD, 6.14 (95%CI 4.58–7.70)] followed by corticosteroids with antioxidants [MD, 6.13 (95%CI 4.12–8.14)] and corticosteroids in combination with hyaluronidase with antioxidants [MD, 5.95 (95%CI 3.79–8.11)]. In terms of safety, most of the drugs were reported to cause mild adverse effects only. Significant inconsistencies could be identified in the analysis for both the outcomes assessed and were further explored. Conclusions: Our study highlighted the potential efficacy of several agents over placebo in the improvement of mouth opening and burning sensation in OSMF patients. However, the RCTs lacked methodological soundness. Well-designed studies with a larger number of participants with a rigorous randomization process and stringent methodology are recommended to strengthen the results obtained, which may help to construct a clinical guideline for OSMF management. MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9409832/ /pubmed/36013221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081272 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gopinath, Divya
Hui, Lai Mong
Veettil, Sajesh K.
Balakrishnan Nair, Athira
Maharajan, Mari Kannan
Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of interventions for the management of oral submucous fibrosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081272
work_keys_str_mv AT gopinathdivya comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT huilaimong comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT veettilsajeshk comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT balakrishnannairathira comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maharajanmarikannan comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis