Cargando…

Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students

INTRODUCTION: Our institution created a review of anatomy relevant to general surgery for third-year medical students. This study was designed to evaluate this review program and determine if participation increased third-year medical students’ anatomy knowledge and confidence identifying anatomical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blythe, Meghan, Quinn, Karson R., Helmer, Stephen D., Smith, John L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Kansas Medical Center 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042835
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16372
_version_ 1784774955276173312
author Blythe, Meghan
Quinn, Karson R.
Helmer, Stephen D.
Smith, John L.
author_facet Blythe, Meghan
Quinn, Karson R.
Helmer, Stephen D.
Smith, John L.
author_sort Blythe, Meghan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Our institution created a review of anatomy relevant to general surgery for third-year medical students. This study was designed to evaluate this review program and determine if participation increased third-year medical students’ anatomy knowledge and confidence identifying anatomical structures in the operating room. METHODS: A formalin-embalmed cadaver-based review of anatomy was created and taught in near-peer fashion to third-year medical students. An anonymous survey and anatomy test were administered to participants pre- and post-session. The survey and test were designed to evaluate anatomy knowledge as well as student confidence identifying structures in the operating room. Survey data were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Seventy third-year medical students completed the anatomy review. There was a statistically significant improvement in students’ confidence levels identifying structures in the operating room (p < 0.001) and in anatomy test scores (p < 0.001). Subjectively, students were thankful for the review session and found it helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This near-peer review session designed at our institution was successful in improving immediate anatomy test scores and confidence levels identifying structures in the operating room. A course similar to this could be included at other medical schools to improve medical student confidence in identifying relevant anatomic structures in the operating room.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher University of Kansas Medical Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94098652022-08-29 Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students Blythe, Meghan Quinn, Karson R. Helmer, Stephen D. Smith, John L. Kans J Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Our institution created a review of anatomy relevant to general surgery for third-year medical students. This study was designed to evaluate this review program and determine if participation increased third-year medical students’ anatomy knowledge and confidence identifying anatomical structures in the operating room. METHODS: A formalin-embalmed cadaver-based review of anatomy was created and taught in near-peer fashion to third-year medical students. An anonymous survey and anatomy test were administered to participants pre- and post-session. The survey and test were designed to evaluate anatomy knowledge as well as student confidence identifying structures in the operating room. Survey data were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Seventy third-year medical students completed the anatomy review. There was a statistically significant improvement in students’ confidence levels identifying structures in the operating room (p < 0.001) and in anatomy test scores (p < 0.001). Subjectively, students were thankful for the review session and found it helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This near-peer review session designed at our institution was successful in improving immediate anatomy test scores and confidence levels identifying structures in the operating room. A course similar to this could be included at other medical schools to improve medical student confidence in identifying relevant anatomic structures in the operating room. University of Kansas Medical Center 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9409865/ /pubmed/36042835 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16372 Text en © 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Blythe, Meghan
Quinn, Karson R.
Helmer, Stephen D.
Smith, John L.
Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students
title Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students
title_full Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students
title_fullStr Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students
title_short Development of a Near Peer Clinical Anatomy Review Session during the Surgery Clerkship: Pre- and Post-Test Results among Third Year Medical Students
title_sort development of a near peer clinical anatomy review session during the surgery clerkship: pre- and post-test results among third year medical students
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042835
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16372
work_keys_str_mv AT blythemeghan developmentofanearpeerclinicalanatomyreviewsessionduringthesurgeryclerkshippreandposttestresultsamongthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT quinnkarsonr developmentofanearpeerclinicalanatomyreviewsessionduringthesurgeryclerkshippreandposttestresultsamongthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT helmerstephend developmentofanearpeerclinicalanatomyreviewsessionduringthesurgeryclerkshippreandposttestresultsamongthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT smithjohnl developmentofanearpeerclinicalanatomyreviewsessionduringthesurgeryclerkshippreandposttestresultsamongthirdyearmedicalstudents