Cargando…

Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study

We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR(®) Reoss) in order to show an alternative method of bone augmentation. Materials and methods: Nine patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Santis, Daniele, Umberto, Luciano, Dario, Donadello, Paolo, Faccioni, Zarantonello, Morris, Alberti, Cristian, Verlato, Giuseppe, Gelpi, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164739
_version_ 1784774983373815808
author De Santis, Daniele
Umberto, Luciano
Dario, Donadello
Paolo, Faccioni
Zarantonello, Morris
Alberti, Cristian
Verlato, Giuseppe
Gelpi, Federico
author_facet De Santis, Daniele
Umberto, Luciano
Dario, Donadello
Paolo, Faccioni
Zarantonello, Morris
Alberti, Cristian
Verlato, Giuseppe
Gelpi, Federico
author_sort De Santis, Daniele
collection PubMed
description We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR(®) Reoss) in order to show an alternative method of bone augmentation. Materials and methods: Nine patients presenting 10 bone defects were referred to solve oral dysfunction due to edentulous atrophic ridges. Guided bone regeneration was performed with titanium meshes combined with autogenous bone grafting and heterologous bovine bone mineral grafting, and exclusively a “poncho technique” soft tissue approach for all the cases. After a mean 9 months of graft healing (range 6–12 months), titanium meshes were removed, and implant surgery was subsequently performed. The results we obtained were positive in terms of volumetric increases in height, length and thickness of the atrophic ridges without biological complications detectable before implant surgery. Results: Out of nine, one site met titanium mesh exposure: however, in all 10 sites a three-dimensional volumetric bone implementation was obtained. The statistical results were estimated by uploading and superimposing cbct scans before and after CBR surgery for each patient, so it was possible evaluate the maximum linear vertical and horizontal bone gain through dedicated Cad Cam software (Exocad GmbH(®)). The average horizontal gain was 6.37 ± 2.17 mm (range 2.78–9.12 mm) and vertical gain was 5.95 ± 2.06 mm (range 2.68–9.02 mm). A total of 18 implants were placed into the grafted sites with a 100% survival rate (clearly they are relative percentages to be compared to the short time elapsed). Conclusions: The results we obtained in this study suggest that this CBR procedure (Yxoss(®) by Reoss) is reliable and safe for bone regeneration to allow implant-prosthetic restoration in horizontal, vertical and combined bone defects. The soft tissue management is diriment: all the cases were managed with a “poncho” flap approach to decrease exposure complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94099812022-08-26 Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study De Santis, Daniele Umberto, Luciano Dario, Donadello Paolo, Faccioni Zarantonello, Morris Alberti, Cristian Verlato, Giuseppe Gelpi, Federico J Clin Med Article We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR(®) Reoss) in order to show an alternative method of bone augmentation. Materials and methods: Nine patients presenting 10 bone defects were referred to solve oral dysfunction due to edentulous atrophic ridges. Guided bone regeneration was performed with titanium meshes combined with autogenous bone grafting and heterologous bovine bone mineral grafting, and exclusively a “poncho technique” soft tissue approach for all the cases. After a mean 9 months of graft healing (range 6–12 months), titanium meshes were removed, and implant surgery was subsequently performed. The results we obtained were positive in terms of volumetric increases in height, length and thickness of the atrophic ridges without biological complications detectable before implant surgery. Results: Out of nine, one site met titanium mesh exposure: however, in all 10 sites a three-dimensional volumetric bone implementation was obtained. The statistical results were estimated by uploading and superimposing cbct scans before and after CBR surgery for each patient, so it was possible evaluate the maximum linear vertical and horizontal bone gain through dedicated Cad Cam software (Exocad GmbH(®)). The average horizontal gain was 6.37 ± 2.17 mm (range 2.78–9.12 mm) and vertical gain was 5.95 ± 2.06 mm (range 2.68–9.02 mm). A total of 18 implants were placed into the grafted sites with a 100% survival rate (clearly they are relative percentages to be compared to the short time elapsed). Conclusions: The results we obtained in this study suggest that this CBR procedure (Yxoss(®) by Reoss) is reliable and safe for bone regeneration to allow implant-prosthetic restoration in horizontal, vertical and combined bone defects. The soft tissue management is diriment: all the cases were managed with a “poncho” flap approach to decrease exposure complication. MDPI 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9409981/ /pubmed/36012978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164739 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Santis, Daniele
Umberto, Luciano
Dario, Donadello
Paolo, Faccioni
Zarantonello, Morris
Alberti, Cristian
Verlato, Giuseppe
Gelpi, Federico
Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
title Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
title_full Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
title_fullStr Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
title_full_unstemmed Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
title_short Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
title_sort custom bone regeneration (cbr): an alternative method of bone augmentation—a case series study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164739
work_keys_str_mv AT desantisdaniele customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT umbertoluciano customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT dariodonadello customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT paolofaccioni customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT zarantonellomorris customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT alberticristian customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT verlatogiuseppe customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy
AT gelpifederico customboneregenerationcbranalternativemethodofboneaugmentationacaseseriesstudy