Cargando…

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps

When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rüber, Fabienne, Wiederkehr, Gilles, Steinack, Carolin, Höller, Sylvia, Bode, Peter Karl, Kölbener, Fabian, Franzen, Daniel Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164700
_version_ 1784775000172003328
author Rüber, Fabienne
Wiederkehr, Gilles
Steinack, Carolin
Höller, Sylvia
Bode, Peter Karl
Kölbener, Fabian
Franzen, Daniel Peter
author_facet Rüber, Fabienne
Wiederkehr, Gilles
Steinack, Carolin
Höller, Sylvia
Bode, Peter Karl
Kölbener, Fabian
Franzen, Daniel Peter
author_sort Rüber, Fabienne
collection PubMed
description When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (p < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9410050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94100502022-08-26 Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps Rüber, Fabienne Wiederkehr, Gilles Steinack, Carolin Höller, Sylvia Bode, Peter Karl Kölbener, Fabian Franzen, Daniel Peter J Clin Med Article When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (p < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique. MDPI 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9410050/ /pubmed/36012940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164700 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rüber, Fabienne
Wiederkehr, Gilles
Steinack, Carolin
Höller, Sylvia
Bode, Peter Karl
Kölbener, Fabian
Franzen, Daniel Peter
Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps
title Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps
title_full Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps
title_fullStr Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps
title_full_unstemmed Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps
title_short Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps
title_sort endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial forceps biopsy: a retrospective bicentric study using the olympus 1.5 mm mini-forceps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164700
work_keys_str_mv AT ruberfabienne endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps
AT wiederkehrgilles endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps
AT steinackcarolin endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps
AT hollersylvia endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps
AT bodepeterkarl endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps
AT kolbenerfabian endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps
AT franzendanielpeter endobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialforcepsbiopsyaretrospectivebicentricstudyusingtheolympus15mmminiforceps