Cargando…

Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia

The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas with artificial intelligence (AI) for high myopia. Cases of highly myopic patients (axial length [AL], >26.0 mm) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with at least 1-month follow-up were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omoto, Miki, Sugawara, Kaoruko, Torii, Hidemasa, Yotsukura, Erisa, Masui, Sachiko, Shigeno, Yuta, Nishi, Yasuyo, Negishi, Kazuno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013086
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164848
_version_ 1784775004527788032
author Omoto, Miki
Sugawara, Kaoruko
Torii, Hidemasa
Yotsukura, Erisa
Masui, Sachiko
Shigeno, Yuta
Nishi, Yasuyo
Negishi, Kazuno
author_facet Omoto, Miki
Sugawara, Kaoruko
Torii, Hidemasa
Yotsukura, Erisa
Masui, Sachiko
Shigeno, Yuta
Nishi, Yasuyo
Negishi, Kazuno
author_sort Omoto, Miki
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas with artificial intelligence (AI) for high myopia. Cases of highly myopic patients (axial length [AL], >26.0 mm) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with at least 1-month follow-up were included. Prediction errors, absolute errors, and percentages of eyes with prediction errors within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) were compared using five formulas: Hill-RBF3.0, Kane, Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, and SRK/T. Seventy eyes (mean patient age at surgery, 64.0 ± 9.0 years; mean AL, 27.8 ± 1.3 mm) were included. The prediction errors with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas were statistically different from the BUII, Haigis, and SRK/T formulas, whereas there was not a statistically significant difference between those with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane. The absolute errors with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas were smaller than that with the BUII formula, whereas there was not a statistically significant difference between the other formulas. The percentage within ±0.25 D with the Hill-RBF3.0 formula was larger than that with the BUII formula. The prediction accuracy using AI (Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane) showed excellent prediction accuracy. No significant difference was observed in the prediction accuracy between the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9410068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94100682022-08-26 Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia Omoto, Miki Sugawara, Kaoruko Torii, Hidemasa Yotsukura, Erisa Masui, Sachiko Shigeno, Yuta Nishi, Yasuyo Negishi, Kazuno J Clin Med Article The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas with artificial intelligence (AI) for high myopia. Cases of highly myopic patients (axial length [AL], >26.0 mm) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with at least 1-month follow-up were included. Prediction errors, absolute errors, and percentages of eyes with prediction errors within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) were compared using five formulas: Hill-RBF3.0, Kane, Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, and SRK/T. Seventy eyes (mean patient age at surgery, 64.0 ± 9.0 years; mean AL, 27.8 ± 1.3 mm) were included. The prediction errors with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas were statistically different from the BUII, Haigis, and SRK/T formulas, whereas there was not a statistically significant difference between those with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane. The absolute errors with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas were smaller than that with the BUII formula, whereas there was not a statistically significant difference between the other formulas. The percentage within ±0.25 D with the Hill-RBF3.0 formula was larger than that with the BUII formula. The prediction accuracy using AI (Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane) showed excellent prediction accuracy. No significant difference was observed in the prediction accuracy between the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas. MDPI 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9410068/ /pubmed/36013086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164848 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Omoto, Miki
Sugawara, Kaoruko
Torii, Hidemasa
Yotsukura, Erisa
Masui, Sachiko
Shigeno, Yuta
Nishi, Yasuyo
Negishi, Kazuno
Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia
title Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia
title_full Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia
title_fullStr Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia
title_short Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia
title_sort investigating the prediction accuracy of recently updated intraocular lens power formulas with artificial intelligence for high myopia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013086
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164848
work_keys_str_mv AT omotomiki investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT sugawarakaoruko investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT toriihidemasa investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT yotsukuraerisa investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT masuisachiko investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT shigenoyuta investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT nishiyasuyo investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia
AT negishikazuno investigatingthepredictionaccuracyofrecentlyupdatedintraocularlenspowerformulaswithartificialintelligenceforhighmyopia