Cargando…
Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models
Severe burns may lead to a series of pathophysiological processes that result in death. Machine learning models that demonstrate prognostic performance can be used to build analytical models to predict postoperative mortality. This study aimed to identify machine learning models with the best diagno...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293 |
_version_ | 1784775029202878464 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ji Hyun Cho, Yongwon Shin, Donghyeok Choi, Seong-Soo |
author_facet | Park, Ji Hyun Cho, Yongwon Shin, Donghyeok Choi, Seong-Soo |
author_sort | Park, Ji Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Severe burns may lead to a series of pathophysiological processes that result in death. Machine learning models that demonstrate prognostic performance can be used to build analytical models to predict postoperative mortality. This study aimed to identify machine learning models with the best diagnostic performance for predicting mortality in critically ill burn patients after burn surgery, and then compare them. Clinically important features for predicting mortality in patients after burn surgery were selected using a random forest (RF) regressor. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and classifier accuracy were evaluated to compare the predictive accuracy of different machine learning algorithms, including RF, adaptive boosting, decision tree, linear support vector machine, and logistic regression. A total of 731 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 90-day mortality of the critically ill burn patients after burn surgery was 27.1% (198/731). RF showed the highest AUC (0.922, 95% confidence interval = 0.902–0.942) among the models, with sensitivity and specificity of 66.2% and 93.8%, respectively. The most significant predictors for mortality after burn surgery as per machine learning models were total body surface area burned, red cell distribution width, and age. The RF algorithm showed the best performance for predicting mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9410169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94101692022-08-26 Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models Park, Ji Hyun Cho, Yongwon Shin, Donghyeok Choi, Seong-Soo J Pers Med Article Severe burns may lead to a series of pathophysiological processes that result in death. Machine learning models that demonstrate prognostic performance can be used to build analytical models to predict postoperative mortality. This study aimed to identify machine learning models with the best diagnostic performance for predicting mortality in critically ill burn patients after burn surgery, and then compare them. Clinically important features for predicting mortality in patients after burn surgery were selected using a random forest (RF) regressor. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and classifier accuracy were evaluated to compare the predictive accuracy of different machine learning algorithms, including RF, adaptive boosting, decision tree, linear support vector machine, and logistic regression. A total of 731 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 90-day mortality of the critically ill burn patients after burn surgery was 27.1% (198/731). RF showed the highest AUC (0.922, 95% confidence interval = 0.902–0.942) among the models, with sensitivity and specificity of 66.2% and 93.8%, respectively. The most significant predictors for mortality after burn surgery as per machine learning models were total body surface area burned, red cell distribution width, and age. The RF algorithm showed the best performance for predicting mortality. MDPI 2022-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9410169/ /pubmed/36013242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Ji Hyun Cho, Yongwon Shin, Donghyeok Choi, Seong-Soo Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models |
title | Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models |
title_full | Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models |
title_short | Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models |
title_sort | prediction of mortality after burn surgery in critically ill burn patients using machine learning models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjihyun predictionofmortalityafterburnsurgeryincriticallyillburnpatientsusingmachinelearningmodels AT choyongwon predictionofmortalityafterburnsurgeryincriticallyillburnpatientsusingmachinelearningmodels AT shindonghyeok predictionofmortalityafterburnsurgeryincriticallyillburnpatientsusingmachinelearningmodels AT choiseongsoo predictionofmortalityafterburnsurgeryincriticallyillburnpatientsusingmachinelearningmodels |