Cargando…

Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease

The concept of vascular age (VA) was proposed to provide patients with an understandable explanation of cardiovascular (CV) risk and to improve the performance of prediction models. The present study compared risk-based VA derived from Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Systematic Coronary Risk Estimat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozakova, Michaela, Morizzo, Carmela, Jamagidze, Giuli, Chiappino, Dante, Palombo, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164931
_version_ 1784775049186639872
author Kozakova, Michaela
Morizzo, Carmela
Jamagidze, Giuli
Chiappino, Dante
Palombo, Carlo
author_facet Kozakova, Michaela
Morizzo, Carmela
Jamagidze, Giuli
Chiappino, Dante
Palombo, Carlo
author_sort Kozakova, Michaela
collection PubMed
description The concept of vascular age (VA) was proposed to provide patients with an understandable explanation of cardiovascular (CV) risk and to improve the performance of prediction models. The present study compared risk-based VA derived from Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE) models with value-based VA derived from the measurement of the common carotid artery (CCA) distensibility coefficient (DC), and it assessed the impact of DC-based VA on risk reclassification. In 528 middle-aged individuals apparently free of CV disease, DC was measured by radiofrequency-based arterial wall tracking that was previously utilised to establish sex- and age-specific reference values in a healthy population. DC-based VA represented the median value (50th percentile) for given sex in the reference population. FRS-based and SCORE-based VA was calculated as recommended. We observed a good agreement between DC-based and FRS-based VA, with a mean difference of 0.46 ± 12.2 years (p = 0.29), while the mean difference between DC-based and SCORE-based VA was higher (3.07 ± 12.7 years, p < 0.0001). When only nondiabetic individuals free of antihypertensive therapy were considered (n = 341), the mean difference dropped to 0.70 ± 12.8 years (p = 0.24). Substitution of chronological age with DC-based VA in FRS and SCORE models led to a reclassification of 28% and 49% of individuals, respectively, to the higher risk category. Our data suggest that the SCORE prediction model, in which diabetes and antihypertensive treatment are not considered, should be used as a screening tool only in healthy individuals. The use of VA derived from CCA distensibility measurements could improve the performance of risk prediction models, even that of the FRS model, as it might integrate risk prediction with additional risk factors participating in vascular ageing, unique to each individual. Prospective studies are needed to validate the role of DC-based VA in risk prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9410254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94102542022-08-26 Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease Kozakova, Michaela Morizzo, Carmela Jamagidze, Giuli Chiappino, Dante Palombo, Carlo J Clin Med Article The concept of vascular age (VA) was proposed to provide patients with an understandable explanation of cardiovascular (CV) risk and to improve the performance of prediction models. The present study compared risk-based VA derived from Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE) models with value-based VA derived from the measurement of the common carotid artery (CCA) distensibility coefficient (DC), and it assessed the impact of DC-based VA on risk reclassification. In 528 middle-aged individuals apparently free of CV disease, DC was measured by radiofrequency-based arterial wall tracking that was previously utilised to establish sex- and age-specific reference values in a healthy population. DC-based VA represented the median value (50th percentile) for given sex in the reference population. FRS-based and SCORE-based VA was calculated as recommended. We observed a good agreement between DC-based and FRS-based VA, with a mean difference of 0.46 ± 12.2 years (p = 0.29), while the mean difference between DC-based and SCORE-based VA was higher (3.07 ± 12.7 years, p < 0.0001). When only nondiabetic individuals free of antihypertensive therapy were considered (n = 341), the mean difference dropped to 0.70 ± 12.8 years (p = 0.24). Substitution of chronological age with DC-based VA in FRS and SCORE models led to a reclassification of 28% and 49% of individuals, respectively, to the higher risk category. Our data suggest that the SCORE prediction model, in which diabetes and antihypertensive treatment are not considered, should be used as a screening tool only in healthy individuals. The use of VA derived from CCA distensibility measurements could improve the performance of risk prediction models, even that of the FRS model, as it might integrate risk prediction with additional risk factors participating in vascular ageing, unique to each individual. Prospective studies are needed to validate the role of DC-based VA in risk prediction. MDPI 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9410254/ /pubmed/36013170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164931 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kozakova, Michaela
Morizzo, Carmela
Jamagidze, Giuli
Chiappino, Dante
Palombo, Carlo
Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease
title Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease
title_full Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease
title_fullStr Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease
title_short Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease
title_sort comparison between carotid distensibility-based vascular age and risk-based vascular age in middle-aged population free of cardiovascular disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164931
work_keys_str_mv AT kozakovamichaela comparisonbetweencarotiddistensibilitybasedvascularageandriskbasedvascularageinmiddleagedpopulationfreeofcardiovasculardisease
AT morizzocarmela comparisonbetweencarotiddistensibilitybasedvascularageandriskbasedvascularageinmiddleagedpopulationfreeofcardiovasculardisease
AT jamagidzegiuli comparisonbetweencarotiddistensibilitybasedvascularageandriskbasedvascularageinmiddleagedpopulationfreeofcardiovasculardisease
AT chiappinodante comparisonbetweencarotiddistensibilitybasedvascularageandriskbasedvascularageinmiddleagedpopulationfreeofcardiovasculardisease
AT palombocarlo comparisonbetweencarotiddistensibilitybasedvascularageandriskbasedvascularageinmiddleagedpopulationfreeofcardiovasculardisease