Cargando…

High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs

Background: Invasive ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is very complex due to unique thoracic pressure conditions. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for ventilation during ongoing chest compressions regarding positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renz, Miriam, Müllejans, Leah, Riedel, Julian, Mohnke, Katja, Rissel, René, Ziebart, Alexander, Duenges, Bastian, Hartmann, Erik Kristoffer, Ruemmler, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164921
_version_ 1784775050835001344
author Renz, Miriam
Müllejans, Leah
Riedel, Julian
Mohnke, Katja
Rissel, René
Ziebart, Alexander
Duenges, Bastian
Hartmann, Erik Kristoffer
Ruemmler, Robert
author_facet Renz, Miriam
Müllejans, Leah
Riedel, Julian
Mohnke, Katja
Rissel, René
Ziebart, Alexander
Duenges, Bastian
Hartmann, Erik Kristoffer
Ruemmler, Robert
author_sort Renz, Miriam
collection PubMed
description Background: Invasive ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is very complex due to unique thoracic pressure conditions. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for ventilation during ongoing chest compressions regarding positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This trial examines the cardiopulmonary effects of PEEP application during CPR. Methods: Forty-two German landrace pigs were anaesthetised, instrumented, and randomised into six intervention groups. Three PEEP levels (0, 8, and 16 mbar) were compared in high standard and ultralow tidal volume ventilation. After the induction of ventricular fibrillation, mechanical chest compressions and ventilation were initiated and maintained for thirty minutes. Blood gases, ventilation/perfusion ratio, and electrical impedance tomography loops were taken repeatedly. Ventilation pressures and haemodynamic parameters were measured continuously. Postmortem lung tissue damage was assessed using the diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) score. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, and p values <0.05 were considered significant. Results: The driving pressure (P(drive)) showed significantly lower values when using PEEP 16 mbar than when using PEEP 8 mbar (p = 0.045) or PEEP 0 mbar (p < 0.001) when adjusted for the ventilation mode. Substantially increased overall lung damage was detected in the PEEP 0 mbar group (vs. PEEP 8 mbar, p = 0.038; vs. PEEP 16 mbar, p = 0.009). No significant differences in mean arterial pressure could be detected. Conclusion: The use of PEEP during CPR seems beneficial because it optimises ventilation pressures and reduces lung damage without significantly compromising blood pressure. Further studies are needed to examine long-term effects in resuscitated animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9410261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94102612022-08-26 High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs Renz, Miriam Müllejans, Leah Riedel, Julian Mohnke, Katja Rissel, René Ziebart, Alexander Duenges, Bastian Hartmann, Erik Kristoffer Ruemmler, Robert J Clin Med Article Background: Invasive ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is very complex due to unique thoracic pressure conditions. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for ventilation during ongoing chest compressions regarding positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This trial examines the cardiopulmonary effects of PEEP application during CPR. Methods: Forty-two German landrace pigs were anaesthetised, instrumented, and randomised into six intervention groups. Three PEEP levels (0, 8, and 16 mbar) were compared in high standard and ultralow tidal volume ventilation. After the induction of ventricular fibrillation, mechanical chest compressions and ventilation were initiated and maintained for thirty minutes. Blood gases, ventilation/perfusion ratio, and electrical impedance tomography loops were taken repeatedly. Ventilation pressures and haemodynamic parameters were measured continuously. Postmortem lung tissue damage was assessed using the diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) score. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, and p values <0.05 were considered significant. Results: The driving pressure (P(drive)) showed significantly lower values when using PEEP 16 mbar than when using PEEP 8 mbar (p = 0.045) or PEEP 0 mbar (p < 0.001) when adjusted for the ventilation mode. Substantially increased overall lung damage was detected in the PEEP 0 mbar group (vs. PEEP 8 mbar, p = 0.038; vs. PEEP 16 mbar, p = 0.009). No significant differences in mean arterial pressure could be detected. Conclusion: The use of PEEP during CPR seems beneficial because it optimises ventilation pressures and reduces lung damage without significantly compromising blood pressure. Further studies are needed to examine long-term effects in resuscitated animals. MDPI 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9410261/ /pubmed/36013161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164921 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Renz, Miriam
Müllejans, Leah
Riedel, Julian
Mohnke, Katja
Rissel, René
Ziebart, Alexander
Duenges, Bastian
Hartmann, Erik Kristoffer
Ruemmler, Robert
High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs
title High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs
title_full High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs
title_fullStr High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs
title_full_unstemmed High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs
title_short High PEEP Levels during CPR Improve Ventilation without Deleterious Haemodynamic Effects in Pigs
title_sort high peep levels during cpr improve ventilation without deleterious haemodynamic effects in pigs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164921
work_keys_str_mv AT renzmiriam highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT mullejansleah highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT riedeljulian highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT mohnkekatja highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT risselrene highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT ziebartalexander highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT duengesbastian highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT hartmannerikkristoffer highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs
AT ruemmlerrobert highpeeplevelsduringcprimproveventilationwithoutdeleterioushaemodynamiceffectsinpigs