Cargando…
Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces
Emerging manufacturing technologies, including 3D printing and additive layer manufacturing, offer scope for making slender heterogeneous structures with complex geometry. Modern applications include tapered sandwich beams employed in the aeronautical industry, wind turbine blades and concrete beams...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09601-0 |
_version_ | 1784775116593299456 |
---|---|
author | Vilar, M. M. S. Hadjiloizi, D. A. Khaneh Masjedi, P. Weaver, P. M. |
author_facet | Vilar, M. M. S. Hadjiloizi, D. A. Khaneh Masjedi, P. Weaver, P. M. |
author_sort | Vilar, M. M. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emerging manufacturing technologies, including 3D printing and additive layer manufacturing, offer scope for making slender heterogeneous structures with complex geometry. Modern applications include tapered sandwich beams employed in the aeronautical industry, wind turbine blades and concrete beams used in construction. It is noteworthy that state-of-the-art closed form solutions for stresses are often excessively simple to be representative of real laminated tapered beams. For example, centroidal variation with respect to the neutral axis is neglected, and the transverse direct stress component is disregarded. Also, non-classical terms arise due to interactions between stiffness and external load distributions. Another drawback is that the external load is assumed to react uniformly through the cross-section in classical beam formulations, which is an inaccurate assumption for slender structures loaded on only a sub-section of the entire cross-section. To address these limitations, a simple and efficient yet accurate analytical stress recovery method is presented for laminated non-prismatic beams with arbitrary cross-sectional shapes under layerwise body forces and traction loads. Moreover, closed-form solutions are deduced for rectangular cross-sections. The proposed method invokes Cauchy stress equilibrium followed by implementing appropriate interfacial boundary conditions. The main novelties comprise the 2D transverse stress field recovery considering centroidal variation with respect to the neutral axis, application of layerwise external loads, and consideration of effects where stiffness and external load distributions differ. A state of plane stress under small linear-elastic strains is assumed, for cases where beam thickness taper is restricted to [Formula: see text] . The model is validated by comparison with finite element analysis and relevant analytical formulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9410535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94105352022-08-26 Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces Vilar, M. M. S. Hadjiloizi, D. A. Khaneh Masjedi, P. Weaver, P. M. Int J Mech Mater Des Article Emerging manufacturing technologies, including 3D printing and additive layer manufacturing, offer scope for making slender heterogeneous structures with complex geometry. Modern applications include tapered sandwich beams employed in the aeronautical industry, wind turbine blades and concrete beams used in construction. It is noteworthy that state-of-the-art closed form solutions for stresses are often excessively simple to be representative of real laminated tapered beams. For example, centroidal variation with respect to the neutral axis is neglected, and the transverse direct stress component is disregarded. Also, non-classical terms arise due to interactions between stiffness and external load distributions. Another drawback is that the external load is assumed to react uniformly through the cross-section in classical beam formulations, which is an inaccurate assumption for slender structures loaded on only a sub-section of the entire cross-section. To address these limitations, a simple and efficient yet accurate analytical stress recovery method is presented for laminated non-prismatic beams with arbitrary cross-sectional shapes under layerwise body forces and traction loads. Moreover, closed-form solutions are deduced for rectangular cross-sections. The proposed method invokes Cauchy stress equilibrium followed by implementing appropriate interfacial boundary conditions. The main novelties comprise the 2D transverse stress field recovery considering centroidal variation with respect to the neutral axis, application of layerwise external loads, and consideration of effects where stiffness and external load distributions differ. A state of plane stress under small linear-elastic strains is assumed, for cases where beam thickness taper is restricted to [Formula: see text] . The model is validated by comparison with finite element analysis and relevant analytical formulations. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9410535/ /pubmed/36032043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09601-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Vilar, M. M. S. Hadjiloizi, D. A. Khaneh Masjedi, P. Weaver, P. M. Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
title | Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
title_full | Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
title_fullStr | Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
title_short | Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
title_sort | stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09601-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vilarmms stressrecoveryoflaminatednonprismaticbeamsunderlayerwisetractionandbodyforces AT hadjiloizida stressrecoveryoflaminatednonprismaticbeamsunderlayerwisetractionandbodyforces AT khanehmasjedip stressrecoveryoflaminatednonprismaticbeamsunderlayerwisetractionandbodyforces AT weaverpm stressrecoveryoflaminatednonprismaticbeamsunderlayerwisetractionandbodyforces |