Cargando…

Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common condition. Several pharmacotherapies have been applied in practice. However, the comparative effectiveness among these pharmacotherapies is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study is to study the comparative effectiveness among differential pharmac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bo, Zheng, Jian, Yang, Yan, Li, Gangfeng, Gu, Xiaojing, Luo, Xiaolan, Luo, Zhao, Chen, Ke, Huang, Yang, Fan, Maoxia, Li, Jian, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3511385
_version_ 1784775182721744896
author Bo, Zheng
Jian, Yang
Yan, Li
Gangfeng, Gu
Xiaojing, Luo
Xiaolan, Luo
Zhao, Chen
Ke, Huang
Yang, Fan
Maoxia, Li
Jian, Wang
author_facet Bo, Zheng
Jian, Yang
Yan, Li
Gangfeng, Gu
Xiaojing, Luo
Xiaolan, Luo
Zhao, Chen
Ke, Huang
Yang, Fan
Maoxia, Li
Jian, Wang
author_sort Bo, Zheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common condition. Several pharmacotherapies have been applied in practice. However, the comparative effectiveness among these pharmacotherapies is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study is to study the comparative effectiveness among differential pharmacotherapies for CPSP through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from inception to 30 March 2022, without any language restriction. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (RoB). The outcome of interest of the study was the change in the scores of pain intensity scales. We estimated standard mean differences (SMDs) between treatments and calculated corresponding 95% CIs. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (529 participants) were included after a screen of 1774 articles. Compared with placebo, pamidronate (SMD -2.43, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.31; P − score = 0.93), prednisone (SMD -2.38, 95% CI -3.09 to -1.67; P − score = 0.92), levetiracetam (SMD -2.11, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.26; P − score = 0.87), lamotrigine (SMD -1.39, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.58; P − score = 0.73), etanercept (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.03; P − score = 0.59), and pregabalin (SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.22; P − score = 0.41) had significantly better treatment effect. Pamidronate, prednisone, and levetiracetam ranked as the first three most effective treatments. In subgroup analyses, prednisone, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and pregabalin were more effective than placebo as oral pharmacotherapies, while etanercept was more effective than placebo as injectable pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that pamidronate, prednisone, and guideline-recommended anticonvulsants were effective for reducing pain intensity for CPSP. Pamidronate and prednisone showed better effect than other pharmacotherapies, which warrants further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9410833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94108332022-08-26 Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Bo, Zheng Jian, Yang Yan, Li Gangfeng, Gu Xiaojing, Luo Xiaolan, Luo Zhao, Chen Ke, Huang Yang, Fan Maoxia, Li Jian, Wang Oxid Med Cell Longev Review Article BACKGROUND: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common condition. Several pharmacotherapies have been applied in practice. However, the comparative effectiveness among these pharmacotherapies is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study is to study the comparative effectiveness among differential pharmacotherapies for CPSP through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from inception to 30 March 2022, without any language restriction. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (RoB). The outcome of interest of the study was the change in the scores of pain intensity scales. We estimated standard mean differences (SMDs) between treatments and calculated corresponding 95% CIs. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (529 participants) were included after a screen of 1774 articles. Compared with placebo, pamidronate (SMD -2.43, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.31; P − score = 0.93), prednisone (SMD -2.38, 95% CI -3.09 to -1.67; P − score = 0.92), levetiracetam (SMD -2.11, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.26; P − score = 0.87), lamotrigine (SMD -1.39, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.58; P − score = 0.73), etanercept (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.03; P − score = 0.59), and pregabalin (SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.22; P − score = 0.41) had significantly better treatment effect. Pamidronate, prednisone, and levetiracetam ranked as the first three most effective treatments. In subgroup analyses, prednisone, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and pregabalin were more effective than placebo as oral pharmacotherapies, while etanercept was more effective than placebo as injectable pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that pamidronate, prednisone, and guideline-recommended anticonvulsants were effective for reducing pain intensity for CPSP. Pamidronate and prednisone showed better effect than other pharmacotherapies, which warrants further investigation. Hindawi 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9410833/ /pubmed/36035203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3511385 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zheng Bo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bo, Zheng
Jian, Yang
Yan, Li
Gangfeng, Gu
Xiaojing, Luo
Xiaolan, Luo
Zhao, Chen
Ke, Huang
Yang, Fan
Maoxia, Li
Jian, Wang
Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort pharmacotherapies for central post-stroke pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3511385
work_keys_str_mv AT bozheng pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jianyang pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yanli pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gangfenggu pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiaojingluo pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiaolanluo pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaochen pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kehuang pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangfan pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maoxiali pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jianwang pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis