Cargando…
Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common condition. Several pharmacotherapies have been applied in practice. However, the comparative effectiveness among these pharmacotherapies is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study is to study the comparative effectiveness among differential pharmac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3511385 |
_version_ | 1784775182721744896 |
---|---|
author | Bo, Zheng Jian, Yang Yan, Li Gangfeng, Gu Xiaojing, Luo Xiaolan, Luo Zhao, Chen Ke, Huang Yang, Fan Maoxia, Li Jian, Wang |
author_facet | Bo, Zheng Jian, Yang Yan, Li Gangfeng, Gu Xiaojing, Luo Xiaolan, Luo Zhao, Chen Ke, Huang Yang, Fan Maoxia, Li Jian, Wang |
author_sort | Bo, Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common condition. Several pharmacotherapies have been applied in practice. However, the comparative effectiveness among these pharmacotherapies is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study is to study the comparative effectiveness among differential pharmacotherapies for CPSP through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from inception to 30 March 2022, without any language restriction. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (RoB). The outcome of interest of the study was the change in the scores of pain intensity scales. We estimated standard mean differences (SMDs) between treatments and calculated corresponding 95% CIs. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (529 participants) were included after a screen of 1774 articles. Compared with placebo, pamidronate (SMD -2.43, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.31; P − score = 0.93), prednisone (SMD -2.38, 95% CI -3.09 to -1.67; P − score = 0.92), levetiracetam (SMD -2.11, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.26; P − score = 0.87), lamotrigine (SMD -1.39, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.58; P − score = 0.73), etanercept (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.03; P − score = 0.59), and pregabalin (SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.22; P − score = 0.41) had significantly better treatment effect. Pamidronate, prednisone, and levetiracetam ranked as the first three most effective treatments. In subgroup analyses, prednisone, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and pregabalin were more effective than placebo as oral pharmacotherapies, while etanercept was more effective than placebo as injectable pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that pamidronate, prednisone, and guideline-recommended anticonvulsants were effective for reducing pain intensity for CPSP. Pamidronate and prednisone showed better effect than other pharmacotherapies, which warrants further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9410833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94108332022-08-26 Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Bo, Zheng Jian, Yang Yan, Li Gangfeng, Gu Xiaojing, Luo Xiaolan, Luo Zhao, Chen Ke, Huang Yang, Fan Maoxia, Li Jian, Wang Oxid Med Cell Longev Review Article BACKGROUND: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common condition. Several pharmacotherapies have been applied in practice. However, the comparative effectiveness among these pharmacotherapies is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study is to study the comparative effectiveness among differential pharmacotherapies for CPSP through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from inception to 30 March 2022, without any language restriction. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (RoB). The outcome of interest of the study was the change in the scores of pain intensity scales. We estimated standard mean differences (SMDs) between treatments and calculated corresponding 95% CIs. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (529 participants) were included after a screen of 1774 articles. Compared with placebo, pamidronate (SMD -2.43, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.31; P − score = 0.93), prednisone (SMD -2.38, 95% CI -3.09 to -1.67; P − score = 0.92), levetiracetam (SMD -2.11, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.26; P − score = 0.87), lamotrigine (SMD -1.39, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.58; P − score = 0.73), etanercept (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.03; P − score = 0.59), and pregabalin (SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.22; P − score = 0.41) had significantly better treatment effect. Pamidronate, prednisone, and levetiracetam ranked as the first three most effective treatments. In subgroup analyses, prednisone, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and pregabalin were more effective than placebo as oral pharmacotherapies, while etanercept was more effective than placebo as injectable pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that pamidronate, prednisone, and guideline-recommended anticonvulsants were effective for reducing pain intensity for CPSP. Pamidronate and prednisone showed better effect than other pharmacotherapies, which warrants further investigation. Hindawi 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9410833/ /pubmed/36035203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3511385 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zheng Bo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bo, Zheng Jian, Yang Yan, Li Gangfeng, Gu Xiaojing, Luo Xiaolan, Luo Zhao, Chen Ke, Huang Yang, Fan Maoxia, Li Jian, Wang Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | pharmacotherapies for central post-stroke pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3511385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bozheng pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jianyang pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yanli pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT gangfenggu pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xiaojingluo pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xiaolanluo pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhaochen pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kehuang pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yangfan pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maoxiali pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jianwang pharmacotherapiesforcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |