Cargando…
Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3473445 |
_version_ | 1784775204470259712 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Ying Wang, Qian Tian, Qing Bo, Changwen Li, Na Zhang, Sujing Li, Peishun |
author_facet | Guo, Ying Wang, Qian Tian, Qing Bo, Changwen Li, Na Zhang, Sujing Li, Peishun |
author_sort | Guo, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were retrieved, and retrospective cohort studies comparing clinicopathological features and related risk factors in SRCC patients were included. RESULTS: In SRCC patient population, males were more than females (male, OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.60); N3 patients were more than N0-2 patients (N0-2, OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.98-5.15); M1 patients were more than M0 patients (M0, OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.88-5.80); patients with tumor > 5 cm were more than those with tumor (≤5 cm, OR = 7.36, 95% CI: 1.33-40.60). Patients with age < 60 years (age ≥ 60 years, OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), lymphatic vessel invasion (no, OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.03-2.45), T2 (T1, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.28) and T4 (T1, OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.30-2.81) stages, and N1 (N0, OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38), N2 (N0, OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.12-3.36), and N3 (N0, OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.58-5.32) stages had higher hazard ratio (HR). CONCLUSION: SRCC may occur frequently in male. Age, lymphatic vessel invasion, TN, and M stage may be risk factors for poor prognoses of SRCC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9410921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94109212022-08-26 Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Guo, Ying Wang, Qian Tian, Qing Bo, Changwen Li, Na Zhang, Sujing Li, Peishun Comput Math Methods Med Review Article BACKGROUND: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were retrieved, and retrospective cohort studies comparing clinicopathological features and related risk factors in SRCC patients were included. RESULTS: In SRCC patient population, males were more than females (male, OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.60); N3 patients were more than N0-2 patients (N0-2, OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.98-5.15); M1 patients were more than M0 patients (M0, OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.88-5.80); patients with tumor > 5 cm were more than those with tumor (≤5 cm, OR = 7.36, 95% CI: 1.33-40.60). Patients with age < 60 years (age ≥ 60 years, OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), lymphatic vessel invasion (no, OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.03-2.45), T2 (T1, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.28) and T4 (T1, OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.30-2.81) stages, and N1 (N0, OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38), N2 (N0, OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.12-3.36), and N3 (N0, OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.58-5.32) stages had higher hazard ratio (HR). CONCLUSION: SRCC may occur frequently in male. Age, lymphatic vessel invasion, TN, and M stage may be risk factors for poor prognoses of SRCC patients. Hindawi 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9410921/ /pubmed/36035278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3473445 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ying Guo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Guo, Ying Wang, Qian Tian, Qing Bo, Changwen Li, Na Zhang, Sujing Li, Peishun Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3473445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoying clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis AT wangqian clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis AT tianqing clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis AT bochangwen clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis AT lina clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis AT zhangsujing clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis AT lipeishun clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis |