Cargando…

Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Ying, Wang, Qian, Tian, Qing, Bo, Changwen, Li, Na, Zhang, Sujing, Li, Peishun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3473445
_version_ 1784775204470259712
author Guo, Ying
Wang, Qian
Tian, Qing
Bo, Changwen
Li, Na
Zhang, Sujing
Li, Peishun
author_facet Guo, Ying
Wang, Qian
Tian, Qing
Bo, Changwen
Li, Na
Zhang, Sujing
Li, Peishun
author_sort Guo, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were retrieved, and retrospective cohort studies comparing clinicopathological features and related risk factors in SRCC patients were included. RESULTS: In SRCC patient population, males were more than females (male, OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.60); N3 patients were more than N0-2 patients (N0-2, OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.98-5.15); M1 patients were more than M0 patients (M0, OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.88-5.80); patients with tumor > 5 cm were more than those with tumor (≤5 cm, OR = 7.36, 95% CI: 1.33-40.60). Patients with age < 60 years (age ≥ 60 years, OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), lymphatic vessel invasion (no, OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.03-2.45), T2 (T1, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.28) and T4 (T1, OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.30-2.81) stages, and N1 (N0, OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38), N2 (N0, OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.12-3.36), and N3 (N0, OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.58-5.32) stages had higher hazard ratio (HR). CONCLUSION: SRCC may occur frequently in male. Age, lymphatic vessel invasion, TN, and M stage may be risk factors for poor prognoses of SRCC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9410921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94109212022-08-26 Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Guo, Ying Wang, Qian Tian, Qing Bo, Changwen Li, Na Zhang, Sujing Li, Peishun Comput Math Methods Med Review Article BACKGROUND: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were retrieved, and retrospective cohort studies comparing clinicopathological features and related risk factors in SRCC patients were included. RESULTS: In SRCC patient population, males were more than females (male, OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.60); N3 patients were more than N0-2 patients (N0-2, OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.98-5.15); M1 patients were more than M0 patients (M0, OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.88-5.80); patients with tumor > 5 cm were more than those with tumor (≤5 cm, OR = 7.36, 95% CI: 1.33-40.60). Patients with age < 60 years (age ≥ 60 years, OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), lymphatic vessel invasion (no, OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.03-2.45), T2 (T1, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.28) and T4 (T1, OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.30-2.81) stages, and N1 (N0, OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38), N2 (N0, OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.12-3.36), and N3 (N0, OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.58-5.32) stages had higher hazard ratio (HR). CONCLUSION: SRCC may occur frequently in male. Age, lymphatic vessel invasion, TN, and M stage may be risk factors for poor prognoses of SRCC patients. Hindawi 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9410921/ /pubmed/36035278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3473445 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ying Guo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Guo, Ying
Wang, Qian
Tian, Qing
Bo, Changwen
Li, Na
Zhang, Sujing
Li, Peishun
Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3473445
work_keys_str_mv AT guoying clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT wangqian clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT tianqing clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT bochangwen clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT lina clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhangsujing clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT lipeishun clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticrelatedriskfactorsofgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaametaanalysis