Cargando…

Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes

BACKGROUND: Axillary surgical management in patients with node-positive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis converted to negative nodes through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear. Removal of more than two sentinel nodes (SLNs) in these patients may decrease the false negative rate (FN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aragon-Sanchez, Sofia, Oliver-Perez, M. Reyes, Madariaga, Ainhoa, Tabuenca, M. Jose, Martinez, Mario, Galindo, Alberto, Arroyo, M. Luisa, Gallego, Marta, Blanco, Marta, Ciruelos-Gil, Eva M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1507881
_version_ 1784775224002084864
author Aragon-Sanchez, Sofia
Oliver-Perez, M. Reyes
Madariaga, Ainhoa
Tabuenca, M. Jose
Martinez, Mario
Galindo, Alberto
Arroyo, M. Luisa
Gallego, Marta
Blanco, Marta
Ciruelos-Gil, Eva M.
author_facet Aragon-Sanchez, Sofia
Oliver-Perez, M. Reyes
Madariaga, Ainhoa
Tabuenca, M. Jose
Martinez, Mario
Galindo, Alberto
Arroyo, M. Luisa
Gallego, Marta
Blanco, Marta
Ciruelos-Gil, Eva M.
author_sort Aragon-Sanchez, Sofia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Axillary surgical management in patients with node-positive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis converted to negative nodes through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear. Removal of more than two sentinel nodes (SLNs) in these patients may decrease the false negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). We aim to analyse the detection rate (DR) and the FNR of SLNB assessment according to the number of SLNs removed. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from October 2012 to December 2018. Patients with invasive breast cancer who had a clinically node-positive disease at diagnosis and with a complete axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients included underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NAC. The SLN was considered positive if any residual disease was detected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the clinicopathologic features and the results of SLNB and ALND. The DR of SLNB was defined as the number of patients with successful identification of SLN. Presence of residual disease in ALND and negative SLN was considered false negative. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery after complete NAC were studied. Of them, 85 patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 50.8 years. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, with an average of 10 lymph nodes removed. The DR of SLNB was 92.9%, and the FNR was 19.1. The median number of SLNs removed was 3, and at least, three SLNs were obtained in 42 patients (53.2%). When at least three sentinel nodes were removed, the FNR decreased to 8.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the SLN assessment was associated with an adequate DR and a high FNR. Removing three or more SLNs decreased the FNR from 19.1% to 8.7%. Complementary approaches may be considered for axillary lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study was approved by our institution's ethics committee (Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCEI:20/0048).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94110002022-08-31 Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes Aragon-Sanchez, Sofia Oliver-Perez, M. Reyes Madariaga, Ainhoa Tabuenca, M. Jose Martinez, Mario Galindo, Alberto Arroyo, M. Luisa Gallego, Marta Blanco, Marta Ciruelos-Gil, Eva M. Breast J Research Article BACKGROUND: Axillary surgical management in patients with node-positive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis converted to negative nodes through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear. Removal of more than two sentinel nodes (SLNs) in these patients may decrease the false negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). We aim to analyse the detection rate (DR) and the FNR of SLNB assessment according to the number of SLNs removed. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from October 2012 to December 2018. Patients with invasive breast cancer who had a clinically node-positive disease at diagnosis and with a complete axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients included underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NAC. The SLN was considered positive if any residual disease was detected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the clinicopathologic features and the results of SLNB and ALND. The DR of SLNB was defined as the number of patients with successful identification of SLN. Presence of residual disease in ALND and negative SLN was considered false negative. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery after complete NAC were studied. Of them, 85 patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 50.8 years. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, with an average of 10 lymph nodes removed. The DR of SLNB was 92.9%, and the FNR was 19.1. The median number of SLNs removed was 3, and at least, three SLNs were obtained in 42 patients (53.2%). When at least three sentinel nodes were removed, the FNR decreased to 8.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the SLN assessment was associated with an adequate DR and a high FNR. Removing three or more SLNs decreased the FNR from 19.1% to 8.7%. Complementary approaches may be considered for axillary lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study was approved by our institution's ethics committee (Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCEI:20/0048). Hindawi 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9411000/ /pubmed/36051467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1507881 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sofia Aragon-Sanchez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aragon-Sanchez, Sofia
Oliver-Perez, M. Reyes
Madariaga, Ainhoa
Tabuenca, M. Jose
Martinez, Mario
Galindo, Alberto
Arroyo, M. Luisa
Gallego, Marta
Blanco, Marta
Ciruelos-Gil, Eva M.
Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes
title Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes
title_full Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes
title_fullStr Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes
title_short Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes
title_sort accuracy and limitations of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with positive nodes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1507881
work_keys_str_mv AT aragonsanchezsofia accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT oliverperezmreyes accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT madariagaainhoa accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT tabuencamjose accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT martinezmario accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT galindoalberto accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT arroyomluisa accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT gallegomarta accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT blancomarta accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes
AT ciruelosgilevam accuracyandlimitationsofsentinellymphnodebiopsyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerpatientswithpositivenodes