Cargando…

Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study

OBJECTIVES: Structured medical records improve readability and ensure the inclusion of information necessary for correct diagnosis and treatment. This is the first study to assess the quality of computer-generated structured medical records by comparing them to conventional medical records on patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saaristo, Leena, Ukkonen, Mika T., Wirta, Erkki-Ville, Kotaluoto, Sannamari, Lammi, Matleena, Laukkarinen, Johanna M., Pauniaho, Satu-Liisa K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01852-w
_version_ 1784775268495261696
author Saaristo, Leena
Ukkonen, Mika T.
Wirta, Erkki-Ville
Kotaluoto, Sannamari
Lammi, Matleena
Laukkarinen, Johanna M.
Pauniaho, Satu-Liisa K.
author_facet Saaristo, Leena
Ukkonen, Mika T.
Wirta, Erkki-Ville
Kotaluoto, Sannamari
Lammi, Matleena
Laukkarinen, Johanna M.
Pauniaho, Satu-Liisa K.
author_sort Saaristo, Leena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Structured medical records improve readability and ensure the inclusion of information necessary for correct diagnosis and treatment. This is the first study to assess the quality of computer-generated structured medical records by comparing them to conventional medical records on patients with acute abdominal pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective double-blinded study was conducted in a tertiary referral center emergency department between January 2018 and June 2018. Patients were examined by emergency department physicians and by experience and inexperienced researcher. The researchers used a new electronical medical records system, which gathered data during the examination and the system generate structured medical records containing natural language. Conventional medical records dictated by physician and computer-generated medical records were compared by a group of independent clinicians. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included. The overall quality of the computer-generated medical records was better than the quality of conventional human-generated medical records – the structure was similar or better in 99% of cases and the readability was similar or better in 86% of cases, p < 0.001. The quality of medical history, current illness, and findings of physical examinations were likewise better with the computer-generated recording. The results were similar when patients were examined by experienced or inexperienced researcher using the computer-generated recording. DISCUSSION: The quality of computer-generated structured medical records was superior to that of conventional medical records. The quality remained similar regardless of the researcher’s level of experience. The system allows automatic risk scoring and easy access for quality control of patient care. We therefore consider that it would be useful in wider practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94112182022-08-27 Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study Saaristo, Leena Ukkonen, Mika T. Wirta, Erkki-Ville Kotaluoto, Sannamari Lammi, Matleena Laukkarinen, Johanna M. Pauniaho, Satu-Liisa K. J Med Syst Patient Facing Systems OBJECTIVES: Structured medical records improve readability and ensure the inclusion of information necessary for correct diagnosis and treatment. This is the first study to assess the quality of computer-generated structured medical records by comparing them to conventional medical records on patients with acute abdominal pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective double-blinded study was conducted in a tertiary referral center emergency department between January 2018 and June 2018. Patients were examined by emergency department physicians and by experience and inexperienced researcher. The researchers used a new electronical medical records system, which gathered data during the examination and the system generate structured medical records containing natural language. Conventional medical records dictated by physician and computer-generated medical records were compared by a group of independent clinicians. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included. The overall quality of the computer-generated medical records was better than the quality of conventional human-generated medical records – the structure was similar or better in 99% of cases and the readability was similar or better in 86% of cases, p < 0.001. The quality of medical history, current illness, and findings of physical examinations were likewise better with the computer-generated recording. The results were similar when patients were examined by experienced or inexperienced researcher using the computer-generated recording. DISCUSSION: The quality of computer-generated structured medical records was superior to that of conventional medical records. The quality remained similar regardless of the researcher’s level of experience. The system allows automatic risk scoring and easy access for quality control of patient care. We therefore consider that it would be useful in wider practice. Springer US 2022-08-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9411218/ /pubmed/36008740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01852-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient Facing Systems
Saaristo, Leena
Ukkonen, Mika T.
Wirta, Erkki-Ville
Kotaluoto, Sannamari
Lammi, Matleena
Laukkarinen, Johanna M.
Pauniaho, Satu-Liisa K.
Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
title Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
title_full Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
title_fullStr Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
title_full_unstemmed Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
title_short Computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
title_sort computer-generated structured electronic medical records are preferable to conventional medical records for patients with acute abdominal pain - a prospective, double-blinded study
topic Patient Facing Systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01852-w
work_keys_str_mv AT saaristoleena computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT ukkonenmikat computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT wirtaerkkiville computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT kotaluotosannamari computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT lammimatleena computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT laukkarinenjohannam computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT pauniahosatuliisak computergeneratedstructuredelectronicmedicalrecordsarepreferabletoconventionalmedicalrecordsforpatientswithacuteabdominalpainaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy