Cargando…
A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
PURPOSE: To explore the possible factors that contributed to the poor performance of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus abdominal surgery regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in cervical cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were se...
Autores principales: | Sun, Si, Cai, Jing, Li, Ruixie, Wang, Yujia, Zhao, Jing, Huang, Yuhui, Xu, Linjuan, Yang, Qiang, Wang, Zehua |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35061066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06348-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Röseler, Jona, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zhang, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Cost–Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Michaan, Nadav, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2021)