Cargando…

Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method

INTRODUCTION: The fast-paced nature of physician assistant (PA) programs warrants an emphasis on high-fidelity, critical care skills training. Generally, manikins or task trainers are used for training and assessing. Soft-preserved cadavers provide a high-fidelity model to teach high-acuity, low-opp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Mary B., Darden, Alix, Hill, Molly, Roberts, Megan K., Varalli-Claypool, Bruna, Miller, Frederick C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01575-0
_version_ 1784775280822321152
author Moon, Mary B.
Darden, Alix
Hill, Molly
Roberts, Megan K.
Varalli-Claypool, Bruna
Miller, Frederick C.
author_facet Moon, Mary B.
Darden, Alix
Hill, Molly
Roberts, Megan K.
Varalli-Claypool, Bruna
Miller, Frederick C.
author_sort Moon, Mary B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The fast-paced nature of physician assistant (PA) programs warrants an emphasis on high-fidelity, critical care skills training. Generally, manikins or task trainers are used for training and assessing. Soft-preserved cadavers provide a high-fidelity model to teach high-acuity, low-opportunity procedures; however, their effectiveness in PA pre-clinical training is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study compared procedural competency of task trainer and soft-preserved cadaver trained pre-clinical PA (pcPA) students in completing tube thoracostomy, endotracheal intubation, intraosseous infusion, and needle thoracostomy. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted with pcPA students (n = 48) at a midwestern program. Participants were randomly assigned to cadaver trained (CT), task trainer (TT), or control group (CG). We assessed procedural competency using skill-specific rubrics and performed qualitative analysis of student comments regarding skill-specific procedural preparedness. RESULTS: Intervention groups surpassed the control group on all skills. The CT students exhibited significantly higher procedural competency compared to TT-trained students in endotracheal intubation (p = 0.0003) and intraosseous infusion (p = 0.0041). Thematic analysis of student comments revealed pre-training students consistently felt unprepared and lacked confidence to perform needle thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy, and endotracheal intubation. Post-training perceptions, CT/TT, focused on preparedness and confidence. The CT group also consistently described the impact of realistic simulation. CONCLUSION: High-fidelity training with soft-preserved cadavers may be the most effective way to prepare pcPA students to perform endotracheal intubation and intraosseous infusion. Student perspectives on procedural preparedness highlight the importance of multidimensional, realistic training methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01575-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94114252022-08-27 Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method Moon, Mary B. Darden, Alix Hill, Molly Roberts, Megan K. Varalli-Claypool, Bruna Miller, Frederick C. Med Sci Educ Original Research INTRODUCTION: The fast-paced nature of physician assistant (PA) programs warrants an emphasis on high-fidelity, critical care skills training. Generally, manikins or task trainers are used for training and assessing. Soft-preserved cadavers provide a high-fidelity model to teach high-acuity, low-opportunity procedures; however, their effectiveness in PA pre-clinical training is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study compared procedural competency of task trainer and soft-preserved cadaver trained pre-clinical PA (pcPA) students in completing tube thoracostomy, endotracheal intubation, intraosseous infusion, and needle thoracostomy. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted with pcPA students (n = 48) at a midwestern program. Participants were randomly assigned to cadaver trained (CT), task trainer (TT), or control group (CG). We assessed procedural competency using skill-specific rubrics and performed qualitative analysis of student comments regarding skill-specific procedural preparedness. RESULTS: Intervention groups surpassed the control group on all skills. The CT students exhibited significantly higher procedural competency compared to TT-trained students in endotracheal intubation (p = 0.0003) and intraosseous infusion (p = 0.0041). Thematic analysis of student comments revealed pre-training students consistently felt unprepared and lacked confidence to perform needle thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy, and endotracheal intubation. Post-training perceptions, CT/TT, focused on preparedness and confidence. The CT group also consistently described the impact of realistic simulation. CONCLUSION: High-fidelity training with soft-preserved cadavers may be the most effective way to prepare pcPA students to perform endotracheal intubation and intraosseous infusion. Student perspectives on procedural preparedness highlight the importance of multidimensional, realistic training methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01575-0. Springer US 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9411425/ /pubmed/36035540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01575-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Moon, Mary B.
Darden, Alix
Hill, Molly
Roberts, Megan K.
Varalli-Claypool, Bruna
Miller, Frederick C.
Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method
title Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method
title_full Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method
title_fullStr Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method
title_short Emergency Critical Skills Training for Pre-clinical Physician Assistant Students: Mixed Method Comparison of Training Method
title_sort emergency critical skills training for pre-clinical physician assistant students: mixed method comparison of training method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01575-0
work_keys_str_mv AT moonmaryb emergencycriticalskillstrainingforpreclinicalphysicianassistantstudentsmixedmethodcomparisonoftrainingmethod
AT dardenalix emergencycriticalskillstrainingforpreclinicalphysicianassistantstudentsmixedmethodcomparisonoftrainingmethod
AT hillmolly emergencycriticalskillstrainingforpreclinicalphysicianassistantstudentsmixedmethodcomparisonoftrainingmethod
AT robertsmegank emergencycriticalskillstrainingforpreclinicalphysicianassistantstudentsmixedmethodcomparisonoftrainingmethod
AT varalliclaypoolbruna emergencycriticalskillstrainingforpreclinicalphysicianassistantstudentsmixedmethodcomparisonoftrainingmethod
AT millerfrederickc emergencycriticalskillstrainingforpreclinicalphysicianassistantstudentsmixedmethodcomparisonoftrainingmethod