Cargando…

Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain

Background  The first-line imaging for low to medium-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with stable chest pain is often a matter of debate. Chest pain is the second most common presentation to the emergency department. Non-invasive imaging has been useful in assisting in the diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alonso, Mileydis, Neicheril, Radhika K, Shettigar, Shruti, Lavina, Allen, Seijo de Armas, Yelenis, Carter, Avery, Liang, Hong, Alonso, Ashley, Piotrkowski, Jared S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042990
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27326
_version_ 1784775329675476992
author Alonso, Mileydis
Neicheril, Radhika K
Shettigar, Shruti
Lavina, Allen
Seijo de Armas, Yelenis
Carter, Avery
Liang, Hong
Alonso, Ashley
Piotrkowski, Jared S
author_facet Alonso, Mileydis
Neicheril, Radhika K
Shettigar, Shruti
Lavina, Allen
Seijo de Armas, Yelenis
Carter, Avery
Liang, Hong
Alonso, Ashley
Piotrkowski, Jared S
author_sort Alonso, Mileydis
collection PubMed
description Background  The first-line imaging for low to medium-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with stable chest pain is often a matter of debate. Chest pain is the second most common presentation to the emergency department. Non-invasive imaging has been useful in assisting in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.  Aim  The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Nuclear Perfusion Stress and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) performed in low to medium-risk patients and how they led to prolonged hospitalization and downstream testing. Materials and methods A total of 519 patients were selected for chart review using the following criteria: admitted for chest pain and older than 18 years of age. Those who presented with STEMI (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) or non-(N)STEMI were excluded. Among these patients, four patients were excluded since their initial test was neither a CCTA nor SPECT Nuclear (NM) Perfusion Stress test. Another 30 patients were excluded based on HEART score (a clinical tool to stratify the risk of major adverse cardiac events) >7 and 111 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 were excluded. A total of 374 patients underwent analysis. Results Univariate data analysis of 374 patients demonstrated a higher percentage of patients with HEART scores 0-3 underwent CCTA (51.6% vs. 31.8% p=0.0250) when compared to patients with SPECT NM perfusion. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the difference in length of stay between SPECT NM perfusion stress and CCTA was significant, patients with the CCTA test were less likely to have a length of stay ≥24 hours (odds ratio {OR}=0.41, p=0.0465) compared to patients with NM perfusion stress test. Conclusion This retrospective cohort study demonstrated that patients who underwent CCTA upon chest pain admission were more likely to have a decreased length of stay time to less than 24 hours. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94117072022-08-29 Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain Alonso, Mileydis Neicheril, Radhika K Shettigar, Shruti Lavina, Allen Seijo de Armas, Yelenis Carter, Avery Liang, Hong Alonso, Ashley Piotrkowski, Jared S Cureus Cardiology Background  The first-line imaging for low to medium-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with stable chest pain is often a matter of debate. Chest pain is the second most common presentation to the emergency department. Non-invasive imaging has been useful in assisting in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.  Aim  The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Nuclear Perfusion Stress and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) performed in low to medium-risk patients and how they led to prolonged hospitalization and downstream testing. Materials and methods A total of 519 patients were selected for chart review using the following criteria: admitted for chest pain and older than 18 years of age. Those who presented with STEMI (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) or non-(N)STEMI were excluded. Among these patients, four patients were excluded since their initial test was neither a CCTA nor SPECT Nuclear (NM) Perfusion Stress test. Another 30 patients were excluded based on HEART score (a clinical tool to stratify the risk of major adverse cardiac events) >7 and 111 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 were excluded. A total of 374 patients underwent analysis. Results Univariate data analysis of 374 patients demonstrated a higher percentage of patients with HEART scores 0-3 underwent CCTA (51.6% vs. 31.8% p=0.0250) when compared to patients with SPECT NM perfusion. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the difference in length of stay between SPECT NM perfusion stress and CCTA was significant, patients with the CCTA test were less likely to have a length of stay ≥24 hours (odds ratio {OR}=0.41, p=0.0465) compared to patients with NM perfusion stress test. Conclusion This retrospective cohort study demonstrated that patients who underwent CCTA upon chest pain admission were more likely to have a decreased length of stay time to less than 24 hours.  Cureus 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9411707/ /pubmed/36042990 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27326 Text en Copyright © 2022, Alonso et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Alonso, Mileydis
Neicheril, Radhika K
Shettigar, Shruti
Lavina, Allen
Seijo de Armas, Yelenis
Carter, Avery
Liang, Hong
Alonso, Ashley
Piotrkowski, Jared S
Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain
title Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain
title_full Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain
title_fullStr Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain
title_short Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain
title_sort efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography versus nuclear perfusion stress in preventing downstream imaging and prolonged inpatient length of stay in low to medium risk patients with chest pain
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042990
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27326
work_keys_str_mv AT alonsomileydis efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT neicherilradhikak efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT shettigarshruti efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT lavinaallen efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT seijodearmasyelenis efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT carteravery efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT lianghong efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT alonsoashley efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain
AT piotrkowskijareds efficacyofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyversusnuclearperfusionstressinpreventingdownstreamimagingandprolongedinpatientlengthofstayinlowtomediumriskpatientswithchestpain