Cargando…

Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the clinical results of patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis who were administered intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) or hyaluronic acid (HA), with or without fluoroscopy. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aksoy, Ahmet, Gulcu, Anil, Tuna, Mehmet Mert, Aslan, Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795441221118920
_version_ 1784775335987904512
author Aksoy, Ahmet
Gulcu, Anil
Tuna, Mehmet Mert
Aslan, Ahmet
author_facet Aksoy, Ahmet
Gulcu, Anil
Tuna, Mehmet Mert
Aslan, Ahmet
author_sort Aksoy, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the clinical results of patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis who were administered intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) or hyaluronic acid (HA), with or without fluoroscopy. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the clinics where the authors worked between 2010 and 2018. Patients with stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis according to KL criteria were included in the study. Age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists stages, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (3rd, 6th, and 12th months) were recorded. Two groups were created as patients who underwent injection with or without fluoroscopy guidance. In group 1, CS (triamnisolone) was administered, and in group 2, sodium hyaluronate 88 mg/4 mL was administered. Obtained parameters were compared. RESULTS: The WOMAC scores at 3 months of both the CS and HA groups were statistically significantly better than before the application, with the improvement in the CS group found to be significantly better than in the HA group (P = .047). At 6 months, the mean WOMAC scores of the CS and HA groups were better than prior to the application, and there was a statistically significant difference (P < .001). No significant difference was found in either the CS or HA group in the comparison of 12-month WOMAC scores with the baseline scores (P = .744 and P = .054). CONCLUSION: In symptomatic hip OA patients, intra-articular administration of CS and HA was seen to be effective at 3 and 6 months after administration. However, the effectiveness was determined to have disappeared within 1 year. Furthermore, in hip OA intra-articular drug applications, it was determined that the blinded technique without radiological guidance performed in the outpatient clinic is as effective and safe as the radiologically guided technique administered in the operating room.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94117382022-08-27 Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study Aksoy, Ahmet Gulcu, Anil Tuna, Mehmet Mert Aslan, Ahmet Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the clinical results of patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis who were administered intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) or hyaluronic acid (HA), with or without fluoroscopy. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the clinics where the authors worked between 2010 and 2018. Patients with stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis according to KL criteria were included in the study. Age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists stages, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (3rd, 6th, and 12th months) were recorded. Two groups were created as patients who underwent injection with or without fluoroscopy guidance. In group 1, CS (triamnisolone) was administered, and in group 2, sodium hyaluronate 88 mg/4 mL was administered. Obtained parameters were compared. RESULTS: The WOMAC scores at 3 months of both the CS and HA groups were statistically significantly better than before the application, with the improvement in the CS group found to be significantly better than in the HA group (P = .047). At 6 months, the mean WOMAC scores of the CS and HA groups were better than prior to the application, and there was a statistically significant difference (P < .001). No significant difference was found in either the CS or HA group in the comparison of 12-month WOMAC scores with the baseline scores (P = .744 and P = .054). CONCLUSION: In symptomatic hip OA patients, intra-articular administration of CS and HA was seen to be effective at 3 and 6 months after administration. However, the effectiveness was determined to have disappeared within 1 year. Furthermore, in hip OA intra-articular drug applications, it was determined that the blinded technique without radiological guidance performed in the outpatient clinic is as effective and safe as the radiologically guided technique administered in the operating room. SAGE Publications 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9411738/ /pubmed/36032389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795441221118920 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Aksoy, Ahmet
Gulcu, Anil
Tuna, Mehmet Mert
Aslan, Ahmet
Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_short Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_sort radiologically guided versus blinded intra-articular injection in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective comparative study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795441221118920
work_keys_str_mv AT aksoyahmet radiologicallyguidedversusblindedintraarticularinjectioninpatientswithhiposteoarthritisaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT gulcuanil radiologicallyguidedversusblindedintraarticularinjectioninpatientswithhiposteoarthritisaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT tunamehmetmert radiologicallyguidedversusblindedintraarticularinjectioninpatientswithhiposteoarthritisaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT aslanahmet radiologicallyguidedversusblindedintraarticularinjectioninpatientswithhiposteoarthritisaretrospectivecomparativestudy