Cargando…
Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
PURPOSE: To assess the subjective quality of anterior segment photos taken from a smartphone camera adapted to the slit lamp compared to a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. METHODS: Non-inferiority study. Five paired images of the anterior segment of normal eyes were taken using an iPhone 11 (App...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9 |
_version_ | 1784775356007317504 |
---|---|
author | Goel, Raghav Macri, Carmelo Bahrami, Bobak Casson, Robert Chan, Weng Onn |
author_facet | Goel, Raghav Macri, Carmelo Bahrami, Bobak Casson, Robert Chan, Weng Onn |
author_sort | Goel, Raghav |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the subjective quality of anterior segment photos taken from a smartphone camera adapted to the slit lamp compared to a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. METHODS: Non-inferiority study. Five paired images of the anterior segment of normal eyes were taken using an iPhone 11 (Apple, Inc., Calif., USA) camera attached to a universal slit-lamp adaptor and a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera (Haag-Streit Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland). Images were collated into a survey in which ophthalmology students, residents, registrars, and consultants participated to select the image taken from the inbuilt slit-lamp camera. If the image quality was subjectively indistinguishable, we expected a 50:50 split for each photograph that was presented. We selected a 10% non-inferiority margin, with the hypothesis that no less than 40% of images believed to be from the conventional camera were in fact from the smartphone camera. RESULTS: There were 27 respondents in the survey: ophthalmology consultants (n = 7), registrars (n = 10), residents (n = 7), intern (n = 1) and students (n = 2). The mean correct identification across the respondents was 11.3 out of 25 (45.2%) images. Overall, the smartphone camera was non-inferior to the inbuilt slit-lamp camera (p < 0.001). The non-inferiority of the smartphone camera was significant for consultants (47.4%, p < 0.01), registrars (47.6%, p < 0.001) and residents (37.7%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment images obtained with a smartphone camera were non-inferior to the commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. Smartphone cameras may be a non-inferior tool for communication of anterior segment images having implications for the ease of access to quality telehealth consultations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9411845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94118452022-08-26 Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study Goel, Raghav Macri, Carmelo Bahrami, Bobak Casson, Robert Chan, Weng Onn Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To assess the subjective quality of anterior segment photos taken from a smartphone camera adapted to the slit lamp compared to a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. METHODS: Non-inferiority study. Five paired images of the anterior segment of normal eyes were taken using an iPhone 11 (Apple, Inc., Calif., USA) camera attached to a universal slit-lamp adaptor and a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera (Haag-Streit Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland). Images were collated into a survey in which ophthalmology students, residents, registrars, and consultants participated to select the image taken from the inbuilt slit-lamp camera. If the image quality was subjectively indistinguishable, we expected a 50:50 split for each photograph that was presented. We selected a 10% non-inferiority margin, with the hypothesis that no less than 40% of images believed to be from the conventional camera were in fact from the smartphone camera. RESULTS: There were 27 respondents in the survey: ophthalmology consultants (n = 7), registrars (n = 10), residents (n = 7), intern (n = 1) and students (n = 2). The mean correct identification across the respondents was 11.3 out of 25 (45.2%) images. Overall, the smartphone camera was non-inferior to the inbuilt slit-lamp camera (p < 0.001). The non-inferiority of the smartphone camera was significant for consultants (47.4%, p < 0.01), registrars (47.6%, p < 0.001) and residents (37.7%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment images obtained with a smartphone camera were non-inferior to the commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. Smartphone cameras may be a non-inferior tool for communication of anterior segment images having implications for the ease of access to quality telehealth consultations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9411845/ /pubmed/36018419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Goel, Raghav Macri, Carmelo Bahrami, Bobak Casson, Robert Chan, Weng Onn Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
title | Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
title_full | Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
title_fullStr | Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
title_short | Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
title_sort | assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goelraghav assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy AT macricarmelo assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy AT bahramibobak assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy AT cassonrobert assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy AT chanwengonn assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy |