Cargando…

Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study

PURPOSE: To assess the subjective quality of anterior segment photos taken from a smartphone camera adapted to the slit lamp compared to a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. METHODS: Non-inferiority study. Five paired images of the anterior segment of normal eyes were taken using an iPhone 11 (App...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goel, Raghav, Macri, Carmelo, Bahrami, Bobak, Casson, Robert, Chan, Weng Onn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9
_version_ 1784775356007317504
author Goel, Raghav
Macri, Carmelo
Bahrami, Bobak
Casson, Robert
Chan, Weng Onn
author_facet Goel, Raghav
Macri, Carmelo
Bahrami, Bobak
Casson, Robert
Chan, Weng Onn
author_sort Goel, Raghav
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the subjective quality of anterior segment photos taken from a smartphone camera adapted to the slit lamp compared to a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. METHODS: Non-inferiority study. Five paired images of the anterior segment of normal eyes were taken using an iPhone 11 (Apple, Inc., Calif., USA) camera attached to a universal slit-lamp adaptor and a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera (Haag-Streit Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland). Images were collated into a survey in which ophthalmology students, residents, registrars, and consultants participated to select the image taken from the inbuilt slit-lamp camera. If the image quality was subjectively indistinguishable, we expected a 50:50 split for each photograph that was presented. We selected a 10% non-inferiority margin, with the hypothesis that no less than 40% of images believed to be from the conventional camera were in fact from the smartphone camera. RESULTS: There were 27 respondents in the survey: ophthalmology consultants (n = 7), registrars (n = 10), residents (n = 7), intern (n = 1) and students (n = 2). The mean correct identification across the respondents was 11.3 out of 25 (45.2%) images. Overall, the smartphone camera was non-inferior to the inbuilt slit-lamp camera (p < 0.001). The non-inferiority of the smartphone camera was significant for consultants (47.4%, p < 0.01), registrars (47.6%, p < 0.001) and residents (37.7%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment images obtained with a smartphone camera were non-inferior to the commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. Smartphone cameras may be a non-inferior tool for communication of anterior segment images having implications for the ease of access to quality telehealth consultations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94118452022-08-26 Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study Goel, Raghav Macri, Carmelo Bahrami, Bobak Casson, Robert Chan, Weng Onn Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To assess the subjective quality of anterior segment photos taken from a smartphone camera adapted to the slit lamp compared to a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. METHODS: Non-inferiority study. Five paired images of the anterior segment of normal eyes were taken using an iPhone 11 (Apple, Inc., Calif., USA) camera attached to a universal slit-lamp adaptor and a commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera (Haag-Streit Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland). Images were collated into a survey in which ophthalmology students, residents, registrars, and consultants participated to select the image taken from the inbuilt slit-lamp camera. If the image quality was subjectively indistinguishable, we expected a 50:50 split for each photograph that was presented. We selected a 10% non-inferiority margin, with the hypothesis that no less than 40% of images believed to be from the conventional camera were in fact from the smartphone camera. RESULTS: There were 27 respondents in the survey: ophthalmology consultants (n = 7), registrars (n = 10), residents (n = 7), intern (n = 1) and students (n = 2). The mean correct identification across the respondents was 11.3 out of 25 (45.2%) images. Overall, the smartphone camera was non-inferior to the inbuilt slit-lamp camera (p < 0.001). The non-inferiority of the smartphone camera was significant for consultants (47.4%, p < 0.01), registrars (47.6%, p < 0.001) and residents (37.7%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment images obtained with a smartphone camera were non-inferior to the commercial inbuilt slit-lamp camera. Smartphone cameras may be a non-inferior tool for communication of anterior segment images having implications for the ease of access to quality telehealth consultations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9411845/ /pubmed/36018419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Goel, Raghav
Macri, Carmelo
Bahrami, Bobak
Casson, Robert
Chan, Weng Onn
Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
title Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
title_full Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
title_fullStr Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
title_short Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
title_sort assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02437-9
work_keys_str_mv AT goelraghav assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy
AT macricarmelo assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy
AT bahramibobak assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy
AT cassonrobert assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy
AT chanwengonn assessingthesubjectivequalityofsmartphoneanteriorsegmentphotographyanoninferioritystudy