Cargando…

AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas

AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas. METHODS: A dataset of 4806 patients with cataract was gat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tingyang, Stein, Joshua, Nallasamy, Nambi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318321
_version_ 1784775370655924224
author Li, Tingyang
Stein, Joshua
Nallasamy, Nambi
author_facet Li, Tingyang
Stein, Joshua
Nallasamy, Nambi
author_sort Li, Tingyang
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas. METHODS: A dataset of 4806 patients with cataract was gathered at the Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, and split into a training set (80% of patients, 5761 eyes) and a testing set (20% of patients, 961 eyes). A previously developed ML-based method was used to predict the postoperative ACD based on preoperative biometry. This ML-based postoperative ACD was integrated into new effective lens position (ELP) predictions using regression models to rescale the ML output for each of four existing formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay and SRK/T). The performance of the formulas with ML-modified ELP was compared using a testing dataset. Performance was measured by the mean absolute error (MAE) in refraction prediction. RESULTS: When the ELP was replaced with a linear combination of the original ELP and the ML-predicted ELP, the MAEs±SD (in Diopters) in the testing set were: 0.356±0.329 for Haigis, 0.352±0.319 for Hoffer Q, 0.371±0.336 for Holladay, and 0.361±0.331 for SRK/T which were significantly lower (p<0.05) than those of the original formulas: 0.373±0.328 for Haigis, 0.408±0.337 for Hoffer Q, 0.384±0.341 for Holladay and 0.394±0.351 for SRK/T. CONCLUSION: Using a more accurately predicted postoperative ACD significantly improves the prediction accuracy of four existing IOL power formulas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94119052022-09-12 AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas Li, Tingyang Stein, Joshua Nallasamy, Nambi Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas. METHODS: A dataset of 4806 patients with cataract was gathered at the Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, and split into a training set (80% of patients, 5761 eyes) and a testing set (20% of patients, 961 eyes). A previously developed ML-based method was used to predict the postoperative ACD based on preoperative biometry. This ML-based postoperative ACD was integrated into new effective lens position (ELP) predictions using regression models to rescale the ML output for each of four existing formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay and SRK/T). The performance of the formulas with ML-modified ELP was compared using a testing dataset. Performance was measured by the mean absolute error (MAE) in refraction prediction. RESULTS: When the ELP was replaced with a linear combination of the original ELP and the ML-predicted ELP, the MAEs±SD (in Diopters) in the testing set were: 0.356±0.329 for Haigis, 0.352±0.319 for Hoffer Q, 0.371±0.336 for Holladay, and 0.361±0.331 for SRK/T which were significantly lower (p<0.05) than those of the original formulas: 0.373±0.328 for Haigis, 0.408±0.337 for Hoffer Q, 0.384±0.341 for Holladay and 0.394±0.351 for SRK/T. CONCLUSION: Using a more accurately predicted postoperative ACD significantly improves the prediction accuracy of four existing IOL power formulas. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9411905/ /pubmed/33836989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318321 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Li, Tingyang
Stein, Joshua
Nallasamy, Nambi
AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
title AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
title_full AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
title_fullStr AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
title_full_unstemmed AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
title_short AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
title_sort ai-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318321
work_keys_str_mv AT litingyang aipoweredeffectivelenspositionpredictionimprovestheaccuracyofexistinglensformulas
AT steinjoshua aipoweredeffectivelenspositionpredictionimprovestheaccuracyofexistinglensformulas
AT nallasamynambi aipoweredeffectivelenspositionpredictionimprovestheaccuracyofexistinglensformulas