Cargando…
Pan-immune-inflammation value is associated with the clinical stage of colorectal cancer
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the clinical significance of preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 366 cases who underwent surgery for CRC were enrolled. Their clinical data were collected. PIV was calculated with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.996844 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: We investigated the clinical significance of preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 366 cases who underwent surgery for CRC were enrolled. Their clinical data were collected. PIV was calculated with the formula PIV = [neutrophil count (10(9)/L)× platelet count (10(9)/L) × monocyte count (10(9)/L) /lymphocyte count (10(9)/L). Patients were divided into high PIV (> median PIV) and low PIV (< median PIV) groups. The relationship between PIV and clinicopathological features of CRC was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to indicate the value of immune-inflammatory biomarkers (IIBs) in predicting the TNM stage of CRC, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the actual clinical value of IIBs. AUC > 0.5 and closer to 1 indicated the better predictive efficacy. The influencing factors of PIV in CRC were analyzed. RESULTS: We found that PIV was positively correlated with tumor size (r = 0.300, p < 0.05), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (r = 0.214, p < 0.05) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125) (r = 0.249, p < 0.05), but negatively correlated with albumin (Alb) (r = −0.242, p < 0.05). PIV was significantly different in patients with different tumor locations (left or right), surgical methods (laparotomy versus laparoscopic surgery) (p < 0.05), and patients with different pathological T stages, N-stage and TNM stages (p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis of IIBs showed the AUC of PIV was greater than other markers when combined with CEA or carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9). Multivariate regression analysis identified T stage, CEA, Alb, and tumor size as the independent influential factors of PIV in CRC. CONCLUSION: PIV is associated with the tumor stage in patients with CRC, which may be useful in preoperative assessment of CRC. |
---|