Cargando…
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: We examined the process and performance of remotely de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072061 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17537.3 |
_version_ | 1784775387421605888 |
---|---|
author | Armitage, Laura C. Lawson, Beth K. Roman, Cristian Thompson, Beth Biggs, Christopher Rutter, Heather Lewis-Jones, Martin Ede, Jody Tarassenko, Lionel Farmer, Andrew Watkinson, Peter |
author_facet | Armitage, Laura C. Lawson, Beth K. Roman, Cristian Thompson, Beth Biggs, Christopher Rutter, Heather Lewis-Jones, Martin Ede, Jody Tarassenko, Lionel Farmer, Andrew Watkinson, Peter |
author_sort | Armitage, Laura C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: We examined the process and performance of remotely delivered ABPM using two methodologies: firstly, a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and secondly, a quantitative analysis comparing ABPM data from a subgroup of 65 participants of the Screening for Hypertension in the INpatient Environment (SHINE) diagnostic accuracy study. The FMEA was performed over seven sessions from February to March 2021, with a multidisciplinary team comprising a patient representative, a research coordinator with technical expertise and four research clinicians. Results: The FMEA identified a single high-risk step in the remote ABPM process. This was cleaning of monitoring equipment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, unrelated to the remote setting. A total of 14 participants were scheduled for face-to-face ABPM appointments, before the UK March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown; 62 were scheduled for remote ABPM appointments since emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic between November 2020 and August 2021. A total of 65 (88%) participants completed ABPMs; all obtained sufficient successful measurements for interpretation. For the 10 participants who completed face-to-face ABPM, there were 402 attempted ABPM measurements and 361 (89%) were successful. For the 55 participants who completed remote ABPM, there were 2516 attempted measurements and 2214 (88%) were successful. There was no significant difference in the mean per-participant error rate between face-to-face (0.100, SD 0.009) and remote (0.143, SD 0.132) cohorts (95% CI for the difference -0.125 to 0.045 and two-tailed P-value 0.353). Conclusions: We have demonstrated that ABPM can be safely and appropriately provided in the community remotely and without face-to-face contact, using video technology for remote fitting appointments, alongside courier services for delivery of equipment to participants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9411972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94119722022-09-06 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses Armitage, Laura C. Lawson, Beth K. Roman, Cristian Thompson, Beth Biggs, Christopher Rutter, Heather Lewis-Jones, Martin Ede, Jody Tarassenko, Lionel Farmer, Andrew Watkinson, Peter Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: We examined the process and performance of remotely delivered ABPM using two methodologies: firstly, a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and secondly, a quantitative analysis comparing ABPM data from a subgroup of 65 participants of the Screening for Hypertension in the INpatient Environment (SHINE) diagnostic accuracy study. The FMEA was performed over seven sessions from February to March 2021, with a multidisciplinary team comprising a patient representative, a research coordinator with technical expertise and four research clinicians. Results: The FMEA identified a single high-risk step in the remote ABPM process. This was cleaning of monitoring equipment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, unrelated to the remote setting. A total of 14 participants were scheduled for face-to-face ABPM appointments, before the UK March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown; 62 were scheduled for remote ABPM appointments since emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic between November 2020 and August 2021. A total of 65 (88%) participants completed ABPMs; all obtained sufficient successful measurements for interpretation. For the 10 participants who completed face-to-face ABPM, there were 402 attempted ABPM measurements and 361 (89%) were successful. For the 55 participants who completed remote ABPM, there were 2516 attempted measurements and 2214 (88%) were successful. There was no significant difference in the mean per-participant error rate between face-to-face (0.100, SD 0.009) and remote (0.143, SD 0.132) cohorts (95% CI for the difference -0.125 to 0.045 and two-tailed P-value 0.353). Conclusions: We have demonstrated that ABPM can be safely and appropriately provided in the community remotely and without face-to-face contact, using video technology for remote fitting appointments, alongside courier services for delivery of equipment to participants. F1000 Research Limited 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9411972/ /pubmed/36072061 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17537.3 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Armitage LC et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Armitage, Laura C. Lawson, Beth K. Roman, Cristian Thompson, Beth Biggs, Christopher Rutter, Heather Lewis-Jones, Martin Ede, Jody Tarassenko, Lionel Farmer, Andrew Watkinson, Peter Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
title | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
title_full | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
title_fullStr | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
title_short | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
title_sort | ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072061 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17537.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armitagelaurac ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT lawsonbethk ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT romancristian ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT thompsonbeth ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT biggschristopher ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT rutterheather ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT lewisjonesmartin ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT edejody ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT tarassenkolionel ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT farmerandrew ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses AT watkinsonpeter ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses |