Cargando…

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: We examined the process and performance of remotely de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armitage, Laura C., Lawson, Beth K., Roman, Cristian, Thompson, Beth, Biggs, Christopher, Rutter, Heather, Lewis-Jones, Martin, Ede, Jody, Tarassenko, Lionel, Farmer, Andrew, Watkinson, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072061
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17537.3
_version_ 1784775387421605888
author Armitage, Laura C.
Lawson, Beth K.
Roman, Cristian
Thompson, Beth
Biggs, Christopher
Rutter, Heather
Lewis-Jones, Martin
Ede, Jody
Tarassenko, Lionel
Farmer, Andrew
Watkinson, Peter
author_facet Armitage, Laura C.
Lawson, Beth K.
Roman, Cristian
Thompson, Beth
Biggs, Christopher
Rutter, Heather
Lewis-Jones, Martin
Ede, Jody
Tarassenko, Lionel
Farmer, Andrew
Watkinson, Peter
author_sort Armitage, Laura C.
collection PubMed
description Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: We examined the process and performance of remotely delivered ABPM using two methodologies: firstly, a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and secondly, a quantitative analysis comparing ABPM data from a subgroup of 65 participants of the Screening for Hypertension in the INpatient Environment (SHINE) diagnostic accuracy study. The FMEA was performed over seven sessions from February to March 2021, with a multidisciplinary team comprising a patient representative, a research coordinator with technical expertise and four research clinicians. Results: The FMEA identified a single high-risk step in the remote ABPM process. This was cleaning of monitoring equipment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, unrelated to the remote setting. A total of 14 participants were scheduled for face-to-face ABPM appointments, before the UK March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown; 62 were scheduled for remote ABPM appointments since emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic between November 2020 and August 2021. A total of 65 (88%) participants completed ABPMs; all obtained sufficient successful measurements for interpretation. For the 10 participants who completed face-to-face ABPM, there were 402 attempted ABPM measurements and 361 (89%) were successful. For the 55 participants who completed remote ABPM, there were 2516 attempted measurements and 2214 (88%) were successful. There was no significant difference in the mean per-participant error rate between face-to-face (0.100, SD 0.009) and remote (0.143, SD 0.132) cohorts (95% CI for the difference -0.125 to 0.045 and two-tailed P-value 0.353). Conclusions: We have demonstrated that ABPM can be safely and appropriately provided in the community remotely and without face-to-face contact, using video technology for remote fitting appointments, alongside courier services for delivery of equipment to participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94119722022-09-06 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses Armitage, Laura C. Lawson, Beth K. Roman, Cristian Thompson, Beth Biggs, Christopher Rutter, Heather Lewis-Jones, Martin Ede, Jody Tarassenko, Lionel Farmer, Andrew Watkinson, Peter Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: We examined the process and performance of remotely delivered ABPM using two methodologies: firstly, a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and secondly, a quantitative analysis comparing ABPM data from a subgroup of 65 participants of the Screening for Hypertension in the INpatient Environment (SHINE) diagnostic accuracy study. The FMEA was performed over seven sessions from February to March 2021, with a multidisciplinary team comprising a patient representative, a research coordinator with technical expertise and four research clinicians. Results: The FMEA identified a single high-risk step in the remote ABPM process. This was cleaning of monitoring equipment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, unrelated to the remote setting. A total of 14 participants were scheduled for face-to-face ABPM appointments, before the UK March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown; 62 were scheduled for remote ABPM appointments since emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic between November 2020 and August 2021. A total of 65 (88%) participants completed ABPMs; all obtained sufficient successful measurements for interpretation. For the 10 participants who completed face-to-face ABPM, there were 402 attempted ABPM measurements and 361 (89%) were successful. For the 55 participants who completed remote ABPM, there were 2516 attempted measurements and 2214 (88%) were successful. There was no significant difference in the mean per-participant error rate between face-to-face (0.100, SD 0.009) and remote (0.143, SD 0.132) cohorts (95% CI for the difference -0.125 to 0.045 and two-tailed P-value 0.353). Conclusions: We have demonstrated that ABPM can be safely and appropriately provided in the community remotely and without face-to-face contact, using video technology for remote fitting appointments, alongside courier services for delivery of equipment to participants. F1000 Research Limited 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9411972/ /pubmed/36072061 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17537.3 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Armitage LC et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Armitage, Laura C.
Lawson, Beth K.
Roman, Cristian
Thompson, Beth
Biggs, Christopher
Rutter, Heather
Lewis-Jones, Martin
Ede, Jody
Tarassenko, Lionel
Farmer, Andrew
Watkinson, Peter
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
title Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
title_full Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
title_fullStr Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
title_full_unstemmed Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
title_short Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
title_sort ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072061
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17537.3
work_keys_str_mv AT armitagelaurac ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT lawsonbethk ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT romancristian ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT thompsonbeth ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT biggschristopher ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT rutterheather ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT lewisjonesmartin ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT edejody ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT tarassenkolionel ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT farmerandrew ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses
AT watkinsonpeter ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringusingtelemedicineproofofconceptcohortandfailuremodesandeffectsanalyses