Cargando…

Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To review recent epidemiological studies investigating carcinogenic or reprotoxic effects among hairdressers who seem to be at greater risk for systemic adverse effects of chemicals released from hair care products than consumers. METHODS: A systematic review according to the PRISMA‐P gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babić, Željka, Macan, Marija, Franić, Zrinka, Hallmann, Sarah, Havmose, Martin S., Johansen, Jeanne D., John, Swen M., Symanzik, Cara, Uter, Wolfgang, Weinert, Patricia, van der Molen, Henk F., Kezic, Sanja, Turk, Rajka, Macan, Jelena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12351
_version_ 1784775391371591680
author Babić, Željka
Macan, Marija
Franić, Zrinka
Hallmann, Sarah
Havmose, Martin S.
Johansen, Jeanne D.
John, Swen M.
Symanzik, Cara
Uter, Wolfgang
Weinert, Patricia
van der Molen, Henk F.
Kezic, Sanja
Turk, Rajka
Macan, Jelena
author_facet Babić, Željka
Macan, Marija
Franić, Zrinka
Hallmann, Sarah
Havmose, Martin S.
Johansen, Jeanne D.
John, Swen M.
Symanzik, Cara
Uter, Wolfgang
Weinert, Patricia
van der Molen, Henk F.
Kezic, Sanja
Turk, Rajka
Macan, Jelena
author_sort Babić, Željka
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To review recent epidemiological studies investigating carcinogenic or reprotoxic effects among hairdressers who seem to be at greater risk for systemic adverse effects of chemicals released from hair care products than consumers. METHODS: A systematic review according to the PRISMA‐P guidelines was performed and included studies published from 2000 to August 2021, in which cancer or adverse reproductive effects were diagnosed in 1995 and onward. Data were synthetized qualitatively due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity of study designs, outcomes, and methods. RESULTS: Four studies investigating cancer frequencies and six studies investigating effects on reproduction among hairdressers were identified. All were of good quality and with low risk of bias. Only one of the four studies found an increased risk of cancer reporting nine times higher odds for bladder cancer in hairdressers than the population‐based controls. Three other studies investigating bladder and lung cancer, and non‐Hodgins lymphoma did not find an increased risk in hairdressers. Regarding reprotoxic effects, numerous outcomes were investigated including menstrual disorders, congenital malformations, fetal loss, small‐for‐gestational age newborns, preterm delivery, and infertility. Increased risk was found for ventricular septal defect in newborns of fathers working as hairdressers. Furthermore, several indices of poor neonatal or maternal health were significantly associated with mothers working as hairdresser. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarce evidence that hairdressers are at increased risk of carcinogenic or reprotoxic effects related to their trade, such health risks cannot be ruled out. Therefore, preventive efforts to diminish occupational exposures to hairdressing chemicals should be targeted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9411989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94119892022-08-26 Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review Babić, Željka Macan, Marija Franić, Zrinka Hallmann, Sarah Havmose, Martin S. Johansen, Jeanne D. John, Swen M. Symanzik, Cara Uter, Wolfgang Weinert, Patricia van der Molen, Henk F. Kezic, Sanja Turk, Rajka Macan, Jelena J Occup Health Review Articles OBJECTIVES: To review recent epidemiological studies investigating carcinogenic or reprotoxic effects among hairdressers who seem to be at greater risk for systemic adverse effects of chemicals released from hair care products than consumers. METHODS: A systematic review according to the PRISMA‐P guidelines was performed and included studies published from 2000 to August 2021, in which cancer or adverse reproductive effects were diagnosed in 1995 and onward. Data were synthetized qualitatively due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity of study designs, outcomes, and methods. RESULTS: Four studies investigating cancer frequencies and six studies investigating effects on reproduction among hairdressers were identified. All were of good quality and with low risk of bias. Only one of the four studies found an increased risk of cancer reporting nine times higher odds for bladder cancer in hairdressers than the population‐based controls. Three other studies investigating bladder and lung cancer, and non‐Hodgins lymphoma did not find an increased risk in hairdressers. Regarding reprotoxic effects, numerous outcomes were investigated including menstrual disorders, congenital malformations, fetal loss, small‐for‐gestational age newborns, preterm delivery, and infertility. Increased risk was found for ventricular septal defect in newborns of fathers working as hairdressers. Furthermore, several indices of poor neonatal or maternal health were significantly associated with mothers working as hairdresser. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarce evidence that hairdressers are at increased risk of carcinogenic or reprotoxic effects related to their trade, such health risks cannot be ruled out. Therefore, preventive efforts to diminish occupational exposures to hairdressing chemicals should be targeted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9411989/ /pubmed/36017574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12351 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Babić, Željka
Macan, Marija
Franić, Zrinka
Hallmann, Sarah
Havmose, Martin S.
Johansen, Jeanne D.
John, Swen M.
Symanzik, Cara
Uter, Wolfgang
Weinert, Patricia
van der Molen, Henk F.
Kezic, Sanja
Turk, Rajka
Macan, Jelena
Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review
title Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review
title_full Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review
title_fullStr Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review
title_short Association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: A systematic review
title_sort association of hairdressing with cancer and reproductive diseases: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12351
work_keys_str_mv AT babiczeljka associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT macanmarija associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT franiczrinka associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT hallmannsarah associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT havmosemartins associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT johansenjeanned associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT johnswenm associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT symanzikcara associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT uterwolfgang associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT weinertpatricia associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT vandermolenhenkf associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT kezicsanja associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT turkrajka associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview
AT macanjelena associationofhairdressingwithcancerandreproductivediseasesasystematicreview