Cargando…

Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Given the increasing healthcare costs, there is an interest in developing machine learning (ML) prediction models for estimating hospitalization charges. We use ML algorithms to predict hospitalization charges for patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Agam, Garg, Chandan, Hariri, Essa, Kassis, Nicholas, Mentias, Amgad, Krishnaswamy, Amar, Kapadia, Samir R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033228
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-21-717
_version_ 1784775437681950720
author Bansal, Agam
Garg, Chandan
Hariri, Essa
Kassis, Nicholas
Mentias, Amgad
Krishnaswamy, Amar
Kapadia, Samir R.
author_facet Bansal, Agam
Garg, Chandan
Hariri, Essa
Kassis, Nicholas
Mentias, Amgad
Krishnaswamy, Amar
Kapadia, Samir R.
author_sort Bansal, Agam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given the increasing healthcare costs, there is an interest in developing machine learning (ML) prediction models for estimating hospitalization charges. We use ML algorithms to predict hospitalization charges for patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: Patients who underwent TF-TAVR from 2012 to 2016 were included in the study. The primary outcome was total hospitalization charges. Study dataset was divided into 80% training and 20% testing sets. We used following ML regression algorithms: random forest, gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), multi-layer perceptron and linear regression. ML algorithms were built for for 3 stages: Stage 1, including variables that were known pre-procedurally (prior to TF-TAVR); Stage 2, including variables that were known post-procedurally; Stage 3, including length of stay (LOS) in addition to the stage 2 variables. RESULTS: A total of 18,793 hospitalization for TF-TAVR were analyzed. The mean and median adjusted hospitalization charges were $220,725.2 ($137,675.1) and $187,212.0 ($137,971.0–264,824.8) respectively. Random forest regression algorithm outperformed other ML algorithms at all stages with higher R(2) score and lower mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared area (RMSE) and root mean squared logarithmic error (RMSLE) (Stage 1: MAE 79,979.11, R(2) 0.157; Stage 2: MAE 76,200.09, R(2) 0.256; Stage 3: MAE 69,350.09, R(2) 0.453). LOS was the most important predictor of hospitalization charges. CONCLUSIONS: We built ML algorithms that predict hospitalization charges with good accuracy in patients undergoing TF-TAVR at different stages of hospitalization and that can be used by healthcare providers to better understand the drivers of charges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9412209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94122092022-08-27 Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement Bansal, Agam Garg, Chandan Hariri, Essa Kassis, Nicholas Mentias, Amgad Krishnaswamy, Amar Kapadia, Samir R. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: Given the increasing healthcare costs, there is an interest in developing machine learning (ML) prediction models for estimating hospitalization charges. We use ML algorithms to predict hospitalization charges for patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: Patients who underwent TF-TAVR from 2012 to 2016 were included in the study. The primary outcome was total hospitalization charges. Study dataset was divided into 80% training and 20% testing sets. We used following ML regression algorithms: random forest, gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), multi-layer perceptron and linear regression. ML algorithms were built for for 3 stages: Stage 1, including variables that were known pre-procedurally (prior to TF-TAVR); Stage 2, including variables that were known post-procedurally; Stage 3, including length of stay (LOS) in addition to the stage 2 variables. RESULTS: A total of 18,793 hospitalization for TF-TAVR were analyzed. The mean and median adjusted hospitalization charges were $220,725.2 ($137,675.1) and $187,212.0 ($137,971.0–264,824.8) respectively. Random forest regression algorithm outperformed other ML algorithms at all stages with higher R(2) score and lower mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared area (RMSE) and root mean squared logarithmic error (RMSLE) (Stage 1: MAE 79,979.11, R(2) 0.157; Stage 2: MAE 76,200.09, R(2) 0.256; Stage 3: MAE 69,350.09, R(2) 0.453). LOS was the most important predictor of hospitalization charges. CONCLUSIONS: We built ML algorithms that predict hospitalization charges with good accuracy in patients undergoing TF-TAVR at different stages of hospitalization and that can be used by healthcare providers to better understand the drivers of charges. AME Publishing Company 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9412209/ /pubmed/36033228 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-21-717 Text en 2022 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bansal, Agam
Garg, Chandan
Hariri, Essa
Kassis, Nicholas
Mentias, Amgad
Krishnaswamy, Amar
Kapadia, Samir R.
Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_short Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_sort machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033228
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-21-717
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalagam machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT gargchandan machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT haririessa machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT kassisnicholas machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT mentiasamgad machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT krishnaswamyamar machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT kapadiasamirr machinelearningmodelspredicttotalchargesanddriversofcostfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement