Cargando…
Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
IMPORTANCE: Prior studies have suggested that participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) results in similar clinical outcomes in patients with low to moderate risk; however, outcome data from demographically diverse populations and patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28720 |
_version_ | 1784775442356502528 |
---|---|
author | Nkonde-Price, Chileshe Reynolds, Kristi Najem, Michael Yang, Su-Jau Batiste, Columbus Cotter, Timothy Lahti, Debora Gin, Nancy Funahashi, Tadashi |
author_facet | Nkonde-Price, Chileshe Reynolds, Kristi Najem, Michael Yang, Su-Jau Batiste, Columbus Cotter, Timothy Lahti, Debora Gin, Nancy Funahashi, Tadashi |
author_sort | Nkonde-Price, Chileshe |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Prior studies have suggested that participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) results in similar clinical outcomes in patients with low to moderate risk; however, outcome data from demographically diverse populations and patients who are medically complex are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare hospitalizations, medication adherence, and cardiovascular risk factor control between participants in HBCR vs CBCR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), an integrated health care system serving approximately 4.7 million patients, who participated in CR between April 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, and with follow-up through April 30, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2022. EXPOSURES: Participation in 1 or more HBCR or CBCR sessions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 12-month all-cause hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations at 30 and 90 days; 30-day, 90-day, and 12-month cardiovascular hospitalizations; and medication adherence and cardiovascular risk factor control at 12 months. Logistic regression was used to compare hospitalization, medication adherence, and cardiovascular risk factor control, with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 2556 patients who participated in CR (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [11.2] years; 754 [29.5%] women; 1196 participants [46.8%] with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4), there were 289 Asian or Pacific Islander patients (11.3%), 193 Black patients (7.6%), 611 Hispanic patients (23.9%), and 1419 White patients (55.5%). A total of 1241 participants (48.5%) received HBCR and 1315 participants (51.5%) received CBCR. After IPTW, patients who received HBCR had lower odds of hospitalization at 12 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97) but similar odds of adherence to β-blockers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42) and statins (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25) and of control of blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.17), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.20), and hemoglobin A(1c) (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.18) at 12 months compared with patients who received CBCR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that HBCR in a demographically diverse population, including patients with high risk who are medically complex, was associated with fewer hospitalizations at 12 months compared with patients who participated in CBCR. This study strengthens the evidence supporting HBCR in previously understudied patient populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9412228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94122282022-09-12 Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Nkonde-Price, Chileshe Reynolds, Kristi Najem, Michael Yang, Su-Jau Batiste, Columbus Cotter, Timothy Lahti, Debora Gin, Nancy Funahashi, Tadashi JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Prior studies have suggested that participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) results in similar clinical outcomes in patients with low to moderate risk; however, outcome data from demographically diverse populations and patients who are medically complex are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare hospitalizations, medication adherence, and cardiovascular risk factor control between participants in HBCR vs CBCR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), an integrated health care system serving approximately 4.7 million patients, who participated in CR between April 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, and with follow-up through April 30, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2022. EXPOSURES: Participation in 1 or more HBCR or CBCR sessions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 12-month all-cause hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations at 30 and 90 days; 30-day, 90-day, and 12-month cardiovascular hospitalizations; and medication adherence and cardiovascular risk factor control at 12 months. Logistic regression was used to compare hospitalization, medication adherence, and cardiovascular risk factor control, with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 2556 patients who participated in CR (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [11.2] years; 754 [29.5%] women; 1196 participants [46.8%] with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4), there were 289 Asian or Pacific Islander patients (11.3%), 193 Black patients (7.6%), 611 Hispanic patients (23.9%), and 1419 White patients (55.5%). A total of 1241 participants (48.5%) received HBCR and 1315 participants (51.5%) received CBCR. After IPTW, patients who received HBCR had lower odds of hospitalization at 12 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97) but similar odds of adherence to β-blockers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42) and statins (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25) and of control of blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.17), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.20), and hemoglobin A(1c) (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.18) at 12 months compared with patients who received CBCR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that HBCR in a demographically diverse population, including patients with high risk who are medically complex, was associated with fewer hospitalizations at 12 months compared with patients who participated in CBCR. This study strengthens the evidence supporting HBCR in previously understudied patient populations. American Medical Association 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9412228/ /pubmed/36006642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28720 Text en Copyright 2022 Nkonde-Price C et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Nkonde-Price, Chileshe Reynolds, Kristi Najem, Michael Yang, Su-Jau Batiste, Columbus Cotter, Timothy Lahti, Debora Gin, Nancy Funahashi, Tadashi Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
title | Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
title_full | Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
title_short | Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
title_sort | comparison of home-based vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation in hospitalization, medication adherence, and risk factor control among patients with cardiovascular disease |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nkondepricechileshe comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT reynoldskristi comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT najemmichael comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT yangsujau comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT batistecolumbus comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT cottertimothy comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT lahtidebora comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT ginnancy comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease AT funahashitadashi comparisonofhomebasedvscenterbasedcardiacrehabilitationinhospitalizationmedicationadherenceandriskfactorcontrolamongpatientswithcardiovasculardisease |