Cargando…
Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548 |
_version_ | 1784775488750747648 |
---|---|
author | Memon, Fareed Uddin Yang, Yunqiao Zhang, Geyin Leghari, Imdad Hussain Lv, Feifei Wang, Yuhan Laghari, Farooque Khushk, Farooque Ahmed Si, Hongbin |
author_facet | Memon, Fareed Uddin Yang, Yunqiao Zhang, Geyin Leghari, Imdad Hussain Lv, Feifei Wang, Yuhan Laghari, Farooque Khushk, Farooque Ahmed Si, Hongbin |
author_sort | Memon, Fareed Uddin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth performance, enhancing innate and adaptive immunity, maintaining gut homeostasis and modulating gut microbiota during enteric infection. This study was therefore designed to investigate the chicken gut whole microbiota responses to Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) probiotic feeding in the presence as well as absence of Eimeria infection. For that purpose, 84 newly hatched chicks were assigned into four groups, including (1) non-treated non-challenged control group (CG − ET), (2) non-treated challenged control group (CG + ET), (3) B. subtilis-fed non-challenged group (BS − ET) and (4) B. subtilis-fed challenged group (BS + ET). CG + ET and BS + ET groups were challenged with Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) on 21 day of housing. Our results for Alpha diversity revealed that chickens in both infected groups (CG + ET and BS + ET) had lowest indexes of Ace, Chao 1 and Shannon, while highest indexes of Simpson were found in comparison to non-challenged groups (CG − ET and BS − ET). Firmicutes was the most affected phylum in all experimental groups following Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota, which showed increased abundance in both non-challenged groups, whereas Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota affected both challenged groups. The linear discriminant analysis effect size method (lEfSe) analysis revealed that compared to the CG + ET group, supplementation of probiotic in the presence of Eimeria infection increased the abundance of some commensal genera, included Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Romboutsia, Subdoligranulum, Bacillus, Turicibacter and Weissella, with roles in butyrate production, anti-inflammation, metabolic reactions and the modulation of protective pathways against pathogens. Collectively, these findings evidenced that supplementation of B. subtilis probiotic was positively influenced with commensal genera, thereby alleviating the Eimeria-induced intestinal disruption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9412415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94124152022-08-27 Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection Memon, Fareed Uddin Yang, Yunqiao Zhang, Geyin Leghari, Imdad Hussain Lv, Feifei Wang, Yuhan Laghari, Farooque Khushk, Farooque Ahmed Si, Hongbin Microorganisms Article Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth performance, enhancing innate and adaptive immunity, maintaining gut homeostasis and modulating gut microbiota during enteric infection. This study was therefore designed to investigate the chicken gut whole microbiota responses to Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) probiotic feeding in the presence as well as absence of Eimeria infection. For that purpose, 84 newly hatched chicks were assigned into four groups, including (1) non-treated non-challenged control group (CG − ET), (2) non-treated challenged control group (CG + ET), (3) B. subtilis-fed non-challenged group (BS − ET) and (4) B. subtilis-fed challenged group (BS + ET). CG + ET and BS + ET groups were challenged with Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) on 21 day of housing. Our results for Alpha diversity revealed that chickens in both infected groups (CG + ET and BS + ET) had lowest indexes of Ace, Chao 1 and Shannon, while highest indexes of Simpson were found in comparison to non-challenged groups (CG − ET and BS − ET). Firmicutes was the most affected phylum in all experimental groups following Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota, which showed increased abundance in both non-challenged groups, whereas Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota affected both challenged groups. The linear discriminant analysis effect size method (lEfSe) analysis revealed that compared to the CG + ET group, supplementation of probiotic in the presence of Eimeria infection increased the abundance of some commensal genera, included Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Romboutsia, Subdoligranulum, Bacillus, Turicibacter and Weissella, with roles in butyrate production, anti-inflammation, metabolic reactions and the modulation of protective pathways against pathogens. Collectively, these findings evidenced that supplementation of B. subtilis probiotic was positively influenced with commensal genera, thereby alleviating the Eimeria-induced intestinal disruption. MDPI 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9412415/ /pubmed/36013966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Memon, Fareed Uddin Yang, Yunqiao Zhang, Geyin Leghari, Imdad Hussain Lv, Feifei Wang, Yuhan Laghari, Farooque Khushk, Farooque Ahmed Si, Hongbin Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection |
title | Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection |
title_full | Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection |
title_fullStr | Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection |
title_short | Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection |
title_sort | chicken gut microbiota responses to dietary bacillus subtilis probiotic in the presence and absence of eimeria infection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT memonfareeduddin chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT yangyunqiao chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT zhanggeyin chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT leghariimdadhussain chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT lvfeifei chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT wangyuhan chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT lagharifarooque chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT khushkfarooqueahmed chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection AT sihongbin chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection |