Cargando…

Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection

Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Memon, Fareed Uddin, Yang, Yunqiao, Zhang, Geyin, Leghari, Imdad Hussain, Lv, Feifei, Wang, Yuhan, Laghari, Farooque, Khushk, Farooque Ahmed, Si, Hongbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548
_version_ 1784775488750747648
author Memon, Fareed Uddin
Yang, Yunqiao
Zhang, Geyin
Leghari, Imdad Hussain
Lv, Feifei
Wang, Yuhan
Laghari, Farooque
Khushk, Farooque Ahmed
Si, Hongbin
author_facet Memon, Fareed Uddin
Yang, Yunqiao
Zhang, Geyin
Leghari, Imdad Hussain
Lv, Feifei
Wang, Yuhan
Laghari, Farooque
Khushk, Farooque Ahmed
Si, Hongbin
author_sort Memon, Fareed Uddin
collection PubMed
description Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth performance, enhancing innate and adaptive immunity, maintaining gut homeostasis and modulating gut microbiota during enteric infection. This study was therefore designed to investigate the chicken gut whole microbiota responses to Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) probiotic feeding in the presence as well as absence of Eimeria infection. For that purpose, 84 newly hatched chicks were assigned into four groups, including (1) non-treated non-challenged control group (CG − ET), (2) non-treated challenged control group (CG + ET), (3) B. subtilis-fed non-challenged group (BS − ET) and (4) B. subtilis-fed challenged group (BS + ET). CG + ET and BS + ET groups were challenged with Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) on 21 day of housing. Our results for Alpha diversity revealed that chickens in both infected groups (CG + ET and BS + ET) had lowest indexes of Ace, Chao 1 and Shannon, while highest indexes of Simpson were found in comparison to non-challenged groups (CG − ET and BS − ET). Firmicutes was the most affected phylum in all experimental groups following Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota, which showed increased abundance in both non-challenged groups, whereas Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota affected both challenged groups. The linear discriminant analysis effect size method (lEfSe) analysis revealed that compared to the CG + ET group, supplementation of probiotic in the presence of Eimeria infection increased the abundance of some commensal genera, included Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Romboutsia, Subdoligranulum, Bacillus, Turicibacter and Weissella, with roles in butyrate production, anti-inflammation, metabolic reactions and the modulation of protective pathways against pathogens. Collectively, these findings evidenced that supplementation of B. subtilis probiotic was positively influenced with commensal genera, thereby alleviating the Eimeria-induced intestinal disruption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9412415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94124152022-08-27 Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection Memon, Fareed Uddin Yang, Yunqiao Zhang, Geyin Leghari, Imdad Hussain Lv, Feifei Wang, Yuhan Laghari, Farooque Khushk, Farooque Ahmed Si, Hongbin Microorganisms Article Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth performance, enhancing innate and adaptive immunity, maintaining gut homeostasis and modulating gut microbiota during enteric infection. This study was therefore designed to investigate the chicken gut whole microbiota responses to Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) probiotic feeding in the presence as well as absence of Eimeria infection. For that purpose, 84 newly hatched chicks were assigned into four groups, including (1) non-treated non-challenged control group (CG − ET), (2) non-treated challenged control group (CG + ET), (3) B. subtilis-fed non-challenged group (BS − ET) and (4) B. subtilis-fed challenged group (BS + ET). CG + ET and BS + ET groups were challenged with Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) on 21 day of housing. Our results for Alpha diversity revealed that chickens in both infected groups (CG + ET and BS + ET) had lowest indexes of Ace, Chao 1 and Shannon, while highest indexes of Simpson were found in comparison to non-challenged groups (CG − ET and BS − ET). Firmicutes was the most affected phylum in all experimental groups following Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota, which showed increased abundance in both non-challenged groups, whereas Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota affected both challenged groups. The linear discriminant analysis effect size method (lEfSe) analysis revealed that compared to the CG + ET group, supplementation of probiotic in the presence of Eimeria infection increased the abundance of some commensal genera, included Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Romboutsia, Subdoligranulum, Bacillus, Turicibacter and Weissella, with roles in butyrate production, anti-inflammation, metabolic reactions and the modulation of protective pathways against pathogens. Collectively, these findings evidenced that supplementation of B. subtilis probiotic was positively influenced with commensal genera, thereby alleviating the Eimeria-induced intestinal disruption. MDPI 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9412415/ /pubmed/36013966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Memon, Fareed Uddin
Yang, Yunqiao
Zhang, Geyin
Leghari, Imdad Hussain
Lv, Feifei
Wang, Yuhan
Laghari, Farooque
Khushk, Farooque Ahmed
Si, Hongbin
Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
title Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
title_full Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
title_fullStr Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
title_full_unstemmed Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
title_short Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Bacillus subtilis Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Eimeria Infection
title_sort chicken gut microbiota responses to dietary bacillus subtilis probiotic in the presence and absence of eimeria infection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548
work_keys_str_mv AT memonfareeduddin chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT yangyunqiao chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT zhanggeyin chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT leghariimdadhussain chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT lvfeifei chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT wangyuhan chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT lagharifarooque chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT khushkfarooqueahmed chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection
AT sihongbin chickengutmicrobiotaresponsestodietarybacillussubtilisprobioticinthepresenceandabsenceofeimeriainfection