Cargando…
Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review
The challenge of vaccine hesitancy, a growing global concern in the last decade, has been aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The need for monitoring vaccine sentiments and early detection of vaccine hesitancy in a population recommended by the WHO calls for the availability of contextually relevan...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081198 |
_version_ | 1784775515797716992 |
---|---|
author | Oduwole, Elizabeth O. Pienaar, Elizabeth D. Mahomed, Hassan Wiysonge, Charles S. |
author_facet | Oduwole, Elizabeth O. Pienaar, Elizabeth D. Mahomed, Hassan Wiysonge, Charles S. |
author_sort | Oduwole, Elizabeth O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The challenge of vaccine hesitancy, a growing global concern in the last decade, has been aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The need for monitoring vaccine sentiments and early detection of vaccine hesitancy in a population recommended by the WHO calls for the availability of contextually relevant tools and measures. This scoping review covers a ten year-period from 2010–2019 which included the first nine years of the decade of vaccines and aims to give a broad overview of tools and measures, and present a summary of their nature, similarities, and differences. We conducted the review using the framework for scoping reviews by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and reported it following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews’ guidelines. Of the 26 studies included, only one was conducted in the WHO African Region. Measures for routine childhood vaccines were found to be the most preponderant in the reviewed literature. The need for validated, contextually relevant tools in the WHO Africa Region is essential, and made more so by the scourge of the ongoing pandemic in which vaccination is critical for curtailment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9412526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94125262022-08-27 Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review Oduwole, Elizabeth O. Pienaar, Elizabeth D. Mahomed, Hassan Wiysonge, Charles S. Vaccines (Basel) Review The challenge of vaccine hesitancy, a growing global concern in the last decade, has been aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The need for monitoring vaccine sentiments and early detection of vaccine hesitancy in a population recommended by the WHO calls for the availability of contextually relevant tools and measures. This scoping review covers a ten year-period from 2010–2019 which included the first nine years of the decade of vaccines and aims to give a broad overview of tools and measures, and present a summary of their nature, similarities, and differences. We conducted the review using the framework for scoping reviews by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and reported it following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews’ guidelines. Of the 26 studies included, only one was conducted in the WHO African Region. Measures for routine childhood vaccines were found to be the most preponderant in the reviewed literature. The need for validated, contextually relevant tools in the WHO Africa Region is essential, and made more so by the scourge of the ongoing pandemic in which vaccination is critical for curtailment. MDPI 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9412526/ /pubmed/36016086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081198 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Oduwole, Elizabeth O. Pienaar, Elizabeth D. Mahomed, Hassan Wiysonge, Charles S. Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review |
title | Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | overview of tools and measures investigating vaccine hesitancy in a ten year period: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oduwoleelizabetho overviewoftoolsandmeasuresinvestigatingvaccinehesitancyinatenyearperiodascopingreview AT pienaarelizabethd overviewoftoolsandmeasuresinvestigatingvaccinehesitancyinatenyearperiodascopingreview AT mahomedhassan overviewoftoolsandmeasuresinvestigatingvaccinehesitancyinatenyearperiodascopingreview AT wiysongecharless overviewoftoolsandmeasuresinvestigatingvaccinehesitancyinatenyearperiodascopingreview |