Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
Lead oxide (PbO) photoconductors are proposed as X-ray-to-charge transducers for the next generation of direct conversion digital X-ray detectors. Optimized PbO-based detectors have potential for utilization in high-energy and dynamic applications of medical X-ray imaging. Two polymorphs of PbO have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36015758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22165998 |
_version_ | 1784775551909625856 |
---|---|
author | Pineau, Emma Grynko, Oleksandr Thibault, Tristen Alexandrov, Alexander Csík, Attila Kökényesi, Sándor Reznik, Alla |
author_facet | Pineau, Emma Grynko, Oleksandr Thibault, Tristen Alexandrov, Alexander Csík, Attila Kökényesi, Sándor Reznik, Alla |
author_sort | Pineau, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lead oxide (PbO) photoconductors are proposed as X-ray-to-charge transducers for the next generation of direct conversion digital X-ray detectors. Optimized PbO-based detectors have potential for utilization in high-energy and dynamic applications of medical X-ray imaging. Two polymorphs of PbO have been considered so far for imaging applications: polycrystalline lead oxide (poly-PbO) and amorphous lead oxide (a-PbO). Here, we provide the comparative analysis of two PbO-based single-pixel X-ray detector prototypes: one prototype employs only a layer of a-PbO as the photoconductor while the other has a combination of a-PbO and poly-PbO, forming a photoconductive bilayer structure of the same overall thickness as in the first prototype. We characterize the performance of these prototypes in terms of electron–hole creation energy (W(±)) and signal lag—major properties that define a material’s suitability for low-dose real-time imaging. The results demonstrate that both X-ray photoconductive structures have an adequate temporal response suitable for real-time X-ray imaging, combined with high intrinsic sensitivity. These results are discussed in the context of structural and morphological properties of PbO to better understand the preparation–fabrication–property relationships of this material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9412672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94126722022-08-27 Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes Pineau, Emma Grynko, Oleksandr Thibault, Tristen Alexandrov, Alexander Csík, Attila Kökényesi, Sándor Reznik, Alla Sensors (Basel) Article Lead oxide (PbO) photoconductors are proposed as X-ray-to-charge transducers for the next generation of direct conversion digital X-ray detectors. Optimized PbO-based detectors have potential for utilization in high-energy and dynamic applications of medical X-ray imaging. Two polymorphs of PbO have been considered so far for imaging applications: polycrystalline lead oxide (poly-PbO) and amorphous lead oxide (a-PbO). Here, we provide the comparative analysis of two PbO-based single-pixel X-ray detector prototypes: one prototype employs only a layer of a-PbO as the photoconductor while the other has a combination of a-PbO and poly-PbO, forming a photoconductive bilayer structure of the same overall thickness as in the first prototype. We characterize the performance of these prototypes in terms of electron–hole creation energy (W(±)) and signal lag—major properties that define a material’s suitability for low-dose real-time imaging. The results demonstrate that both X-ray photoconductive structures have an adequate temporal response suitable for real-time X-ray imaging, combined with high intrinsic sensitivity. These results are discussed in the context of structural and morphological properties of PbO to better understand the preparation–fabrication–property relationships of this material. MDPI 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9412672/ /pubmed/36015758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22165998 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pineau, Emma Grynko, Oleksandr Thibault, Tristen Alexandrov, Alexander Csík, Attila Kökényesi, Sándor Reznik, Alla Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes |
title | Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes |
title_sort | comparative analysis of multilayer lead oxide-based x-ray detector prototypes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36015758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22165998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pineauemma comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes AT grynkooleksandr comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes AT thibaulttristen comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes AT alexandrovalexander comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes AT csikattila comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes AT kokenyesisandor comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes AT reznikalla comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes |