Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes

Lead oxide (PbO) photoconductors are proposed as X-ray-to-charge transducers for the next generation of direct conversion digital X-ray detectors. Optimized PbO-based detectors have potential for utilization in high-energy and dynamic applications of medical X-ray imaging. Two polymorphs of PbO have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pineau, Emma, Grynko, Oleksandr, Thibault, Tristen, Alexandrov, Alexander, Csík, Attila, Kökényesi, Sándor, Reznik, Alla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36015758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22165998
_version_ 1784775551909625856
author Pineau, Emma
Grynko, Oleksandr
Thibault, Tristen
Alexandrov, Alexander
Csík, Attila
Kökényesi, Sándor
Reznik, Alla
author_facet Pineau, Emma
Grynko, Oleksandr
Thibault, Tristen
Alexandrov, Alexander
Csík, Attila
Kökényesi, Sándor
Reznik, Alla
author_sort Pineau, Emma
collection PubMed
description Lead oxide (PbO) photoconductors are proposed as X-ray-to-charge transducers for the next generation of direct conversion digital X-ray detectors. Optimized PbO-based detectors have potential for utilization in high-energy and dynamic applications of medical X-ray imaging. Two polymorphs of PbO have been considered so far for imaging applications: polycrystalline lead oxide (poly-PbO) and amorphous lead oxide (a-PbO). Here, we provide the comparative analysis of two PbO-based single-pixel X-ray detector prototypes: one prototype employs only a layer of a-PbO as the photoconductor while the other has a combination of a-PbO and poly-PbO, forming a photoconductive bilayer structure of the same overall thickness as in the first prototype. We characterize the performance of these prototypes in terms of electron–hole creation energy (W(±)) and signal lag—major properties that define a material’s suitability for low-dose real-time imaging. The results demonstrate that both X-ray photoconductive structures have an adequate temporal response suitable for real-time X-ray imaging, combined with high intrinsic sensitivity. These results are discussed in the context of structural and morphological properties of PbO to better understand the preparation–fabrication–property relationships of this material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9412672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94126722022-08-27 Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes Pineau, Emma Grynko, Oleksandr Thibault, Tristen Alexandrov, Alexander Csík, Attila Kökényesi, Sándor Reznik, Alla Sensors (Basel) Article Lead oxide (PbO) photoconductors are proposed as X-ray-to-charge transducers for the next generation of direct conversion digital X-ray detectors. Optimized PbO-based detectors have potential for utilization in high-energy and dynamic applications of medical X-ray imaging. Two polymorphs of PbO have been considered so far for imaging applications: polycrystalline lead oxide (poly-PbO) and amorphous lead oxide (a-PbO). Here, we provide the comparative analysis of two PbO-based single-pixel X-ray detector prototypes: one prototype employs only a layer of a-PbO as the photoconductor while the other has a combination of a-PbO and poly-PbO, forming a photoconductive bilayer structure of the same overall thickness as in the first prototype. We characterize the performance of these prototypes in terms of electron–hole creation energy (W(±)) and signal lag—major properties that define a material’s suitability for low-dose real-time imaging. The results demonstrate that both X-ray photoconductive structures have an adequate temporal response suitable for real-time X-ray imaging, combined with high intrinsic sensitivity. These results are discussed in the context of structural and morphological properties of PbO to better understand the preparation–fabrication–property relationships of this material. MDPI 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9412672/ /pubmed/36015758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22165998 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pineau, Emma
Grynko, Oleksandr
Thibault, Tristen
Alexandrov, Alexander
Csík, Attila
Kökényesi, Sándor
Reznik, Alla
Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
title Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
title_full Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
title_short Comparative Analysis of Multilayer Lead Oxide-Based X-ray Detector Prototypes
title_sort comparative analysis of multilayer lead oxide-based x-ray detector prototypes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36015758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22165998
work_keys_str_mv AT pineauemma comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes
AT grynkooleksandr comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes
AT thibaulttristen comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes
AT alexandrovalexander comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes
AT csikattila comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes
AT kokenyesisandor comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes
AT reznikalla comparativeanalysisofmultilayerleadoxidebasedxraydetectorprototypes