Cargando…
How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
OBJECTIVES: To describe how patients are engaged with cancer decisions in the context of multidisciplinary team (MDT) and how MDT recommendations are operationalised in the context of a shared decision. DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative study. SETTING: Four head and neck cancer centres in the north o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654 |
_version_ | 1784775678168662016 |
---|---|
author | Hamilton, David Winston Heaven, Benjamin Thomson, Richard Wilson, Janet Exley, Catherine |
author_facet | Hamilton, David Winston Heaven, Benjamin Thomson, Richard Wilson, Janet Exley, Catherine |
author_sort | Hamilton, David Winston |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To describe how patients are engaged with cancer decisions in the context of multidisciplinary team (MDT) and how MDT recommendations are operationalised in the context of a shared decision. DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative study. SETTING: Four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of new or recurrent head and neck cancer; non-participant observation of 35 MDT meetings and 37 MDT clinics, informal interviews, and formal, semistructured interviews with 20 patients and 9 MDT staff members. METHODS: Ethnographic methods including non-participant observation of MDT meetings and clinic appointments, informal interviews, field notes and formal semistructured interviews with patients and MDT members. RESULTS: MDT discussions often conclude with a firm recommendation for treatment. When delivered to a patient in clinic, this recommendation is often accepted by the patient, but this response may result from the disempowered position in which they find themselves. While patient behaviour may thus appear to endorse clinicians’ views that a paternalistic approach is desired by patients (creating a ‘cycle of paternalism’), the rigidity of the MDT treatment recommendation can act as a barrier to discussion of options and the exploration of patient values. CONCLUSIONS: The current model of MDT decision-making does not support shared decision-making and may actively undermine it. A model should be developed whereby the individual patient perspective has more input into MDT discussions, and where decisions are made on potential treatment options rather than providing a single recommendation for discussion with the patient. Deeper consideration should be given to how the MDT incorporates the patient perspective and/or delivers its discussion of options to the patient. In order to achieve these objectives, a new model of MDT working is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9413178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94131782022-09-12 How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England Hamilton, David Winston Heaven, Benjamin Thomson, Richard Wilson, Janet Exley, Catherine BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To describe how patients are engaged with cancer decisions in the context of multidisciplinary team (MDT) and how MDT recommendations are operationalised in the context of a shared decision. DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative study. SETTING: Four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of new or recurrent head and neck cancer; non-participant observation of 35 MDT meetings and 37 MDT clinics, informal interviews, and formal, semistructured interviews with 20 patients and 9 MDT staff members. METHODS: Ethnographic methods including non-participant observation of MDT meetings and clinic appointments, informal interviews, field notes and formal semistructured interviews with patients and MDT members. RESULTS: MDT discussions often conclude with a firm recommendation for treatment. When delivered to a patient in clinic, this recommendation is often accepted by the patient, but this response may result from the disempowered position in which they find themselves. While patient behaviour may thus appear to endorse clinicians’ views that a paternalistic approach is desired by patients (creating a ‘cycle of paternalism’), the rigidity of the MDT treatment recommendation can act as a barrier to discussion of options and the exploration of patient values. CONCLUSIONS: The current model of MDT decision-making does not support shared decision-making and may actively undermine it. A model should be developed whereby the individual patient perspective has more input into MDT discussions, and where decisions are made on potential treatment options rather than providing a single recommendation for discussion with the patient. Deeper consideration should be given to how the MDT incorporates the patient perspective and/or delivers its discussion of options to the patient. In order to achieve these objectives, a new model of MDT working is required. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9413178/ /pubmed/36002202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Hamilton, David Winston Heaven, Benjamin Thomson, Richard Wilson, Janet Exley, Catherine How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England |
title | How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England |
title_full | How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England |
title_fullStr | How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England |
title_full_unstemmed | How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England |
title_short | How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England |
title_sort | how do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of england |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamiltondavidwinston howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland AT heavenbenjamin howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland AT thomsonrichard howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland AT wilsonjanet howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland AT exleycatherine howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland |