Cargando…

How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England

OBJECTIVES: To describe how patients are engaged with cancer decisions in the context of multidisciplinary team (MDT) and how MDT recommendations are operationalised in the context of a shared decision. DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative study. SETTING: Four head and neck cancer centres in the north o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, David Winston, Heaven, Benjamin, Thomson, Richard, Wilson, Janet, Exley, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654
_version_ 1784775678168662016
author Hamilton, David Winston
Heaven, Benjamin
Thomson, Richard
Wilson, Janet
Exley, Catherine
author_facet Hamilton, David Winston
Heaven, Benjamin
Thomson, Richard
Wilson, Janet
Exley, Catherine
author_sort Hamilton, David Winston
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe how patients are engaged with cancer decisions in the context of multidisciplinary team (MDT) and how MDT recommendations are operationalised in the context of a shared decision. DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative study. SETTING: Four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of new or recurrent head and neck cancer; non-participant observation of 35 MDT meetings and 37 MDT clinics, informal interviews, and formal, semistructured interviews with 20 patients and 9 MDT staff members. METHODS: Ethnographic methods including non-participant observation of MDT meetings and clinic appointments, informal interviews, field notes and formal semistructured interviews with patients and MDT members. RESULTS: MDT discussions often conclude with a firm recommendation for treatment. When delivered to a patient in clinic, this recommendation is often accepted by the patient, but this response may result from the disempowered position in which they find themselves. While patient behaviour may thus appear to endorse clinicians’ views that a paternalistic approach is desired by patients (creating a ‘cycle of paternalism’), the rigidity of the MDT treatment recommendation can act as a barrier to discussion of options and the exploration of patient values. CONCLUSIONS: The current model of MDT decision-making does not support shared decision-making and may actively undermine it. A model should be developed whereby the individual patient perspective has more input into MDT discussions, and where decisions are made on potential treatment options rather than providing a single recommendation for discussion with the patient. Deeper consideration should be given to how the MDT incorporates the patient perspective and/or delivers its discussion of options to the patient. In order to achieve these objectives, a new model of MDT working is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9413178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94131782022-09-12 How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England Hamilton, David Winston Heaven, Benjamin Thomson, Richard Wilson, Janet Exley, Catherine BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To describe how patients are engaged with cancer decisions in the context of multidisciplinary team (MDT) and how MDT recommendations are operationalised in the context of a shared decision. DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative study. SETTING: Four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of new or recurrent head and neck cancer; non-participant observation of 35 MDT meetings and 37 MDT clinics, informal interviews, and formal, semistructured interviews with 20 patients and 9 MDT staff members. METHODS: Ethnographic methods including non-participant observation of MDT meetings and clinic appointments, informal interviews, field notes and formal semistructured interviews with patients and MDT members. RESULTS: MDT discussions often conclude with a firm recommendation for treatment. When delivered to a patient in clinic, this recommendation is often accepted by the patient, but this response may result from the disempowered position in which they find themselves. While patient behaviour may thus appear to endorse clinicians’ views that a paternalistic approach is desired by patients (creating a ‘cycle of paternalism’), the rigidity of the MDT treatment recommendation can act as a barrier to discussion of options and the exploration of patient values. CONCLUSIONS: The current model of MDT decision-making does not support shared decision-making and may actively undermine it. A model should be developed whereby the individual patient perspective has more input into MDT discussions, and where decisions are made on potential treatment options rather than providing a single recommendation for discussion with the patient. Deeper consideration should be given to how the MDT incorporates the patient perspective and/or delivers its discussion of options to the patient. In order to achieve these objectives, a new model of MDT working is required. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9413178/ /pubmed/36002202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Hamilton, David Winston
Heaven, Benjamin
Thomson, Richard
Wilson, Janet
Exley, Catherine
How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
title How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
title_full How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
title_fullStr How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
title_full_unstemmed How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
title_short How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England
title_sort how do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of england
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltondavidwinston howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland
AT heavenbenjamin howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland
AT thomsonrichard howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland
AT wilsonjanet howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland
AT exleycatherine howdopatientsmakedecisionsinthecontextofamultidisciplinaryteamanethnographicstudyoffourheadandneckcancercentresinthenorthofengland