Cargando…

Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy

In the Subantarctic sector of the Southern Ocean, vertical entrainment of iron (Fe) triggers the seasonal productivity cycle but diminishing physical supply during the spring to summer transition forces microbial assemblages to rapidly acclimate. Here, we tested how phytoplankton and bacteria within...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fourquez, Marion, Strzepek, Robert F., Ellwood, Michael J., Hassler, Christel, Cabanes, Damien, Eggins, Sam, Pearce, Imojen, Deppeler, Stacy, Trull, Thomas W., Boyd, Philip W., Bressac, Matthieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081655
_version_ 1784775765473099776
author Fourquez, Marion
Strzepek, Robert F.
Ellwood, Michael J.
Hassler, Christel
Cabanes, Damien
Eggins, Sam
Pearce, Imojen
Deppeler, Stacy
Trull, Thomas W.
Boyd, Philip W.
Bressac, Matthieu
author_facet Fourquez, Marion
Strzepek, Robert F.
Ellwood, Michael J.
Hassler, Christel
Cabanes, Damien
Eggins, Sam
Pearce, Imojen
Deppeler, Stacy
Trull, Thomas W.
Boyd, Philip W.
Bressac, Matthieu
author_sort Fourquez, Marion
collection PubMed
description In the Subantarctic sector of the Southern Ocean, vertical entrainment of iron (Fe) triggers the seasonal productivity cycle but diminishing physical supply during the spring to summer transition forces microbial assemblages to rapidly acclimate. Here, we tested how phytoplankton and bacteria within an isolated eddy respond to different dissolved Fe (DFe)/ligand inputs. We used three treatments: one that mimicked the entrainment of new DFe (Fe-NEW), another in which DFe was supplied from bacterial regeneration of particles (Fe-REG), and a control with no addition of DFe (Fe-NO). After 6 days, 3.5 (Fe-NO, Fe-NEW) to 5-fold (Fe-REG) increases in Chlorophyll a were observed. These responses of the phytoplankton community were best explained by the differences between the treatments in the amount of DFe recycled during the incubation (Fe-REG, 15% recycled c.f. 40% Fe-NEW, 60% Fe-NO). This additional recycling was more likely mediated by bacteria. By day 6, bacterial production was comparable between Fe-NO and Fe-NEW but was approximately two-fold higher in Fe-REG. A preferential response of phytoplankton (haptophyte-dominated) relative to high nucleic acid (HNA) bacteria was also found in the Fe-REG treatment while the relative proportion of diatoms increased faster in the Fe-NEW and Fe-NO treatments. Comparisons between light and dark incubations further confirmed the competition between picophytoplankton and HNA for DFe. Overall, our results demonstrate great versatility by microorganisms to use different Fe sources that results in highly efficient Fe recycling within surface waters. This study also encourages future research to further investigate the interactions between functional groups of microbes (e.g. HNA and cyanobacteria) to better constraint modeling in Fe and carbon biogeochemical cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9413495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94134952022-08-27 Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy Fourquez, Marion Strzepek, Robert F. Ellwood, Michael J. Hassler, Christel Cabanes, Damien Eggins, Sam Pearce, Imojen Deppeler, Stacy Trull, Thomas W. Boyd, Philip W. Bressac, Matthieu Microorganisms Article In the Subantarctic sector of the Southern Ocean, vertical entrainment of iron (Fe) triggers the seasonal productivity cycle but diminishing physical supply during the spring to summer transition forces microbial assemblages to rapidly acclimate. Here, we tested how phytoplankton and bacteria within an isolated eddy respond to different dissolved Fe (DFe)/ligand inputs. We used three treatments: one that mimicked the entrainment of new DFe (Fe-NEW), another in which DFe was supplied from bacterial regeneration of particles (Fe-REG), and a control with no addition of DFe (Fe-NO). After 6 days, 3.5 (Fe-NO, Fe-NEW) to 5-fold (Fe-REG) increases in Chlorophyll a were observed. These responses of the phytoplankton community were best explained by the differences between the treatments in the amount of DFe recycled during the incubation (Fe-REG, 15% recycled c.f. 40% Fe-NEW, 60% Fe-NO). This additional recycling was more likely mediated by bacteria. By day 6, bacterial production was comparable between Fe-NO and Fe-NEW but was approximately two-fold higher in Fe-REG. A preferential response of phytoplankton (haptophyte-dominated) relative to high nucleic acid (HNA) bacteria was also found in the Fe-REG treatment while the relative proportion of diatoms increased faster in the Fe-NEW and Fe-NO treatments. Comparisons between light and dark incubations further confirmed the competition between picophytoplankton and HNA for DFe. Overall, our results demonstrate great versatility by microorganisms to use different Fe sources that results in highly efficient Fe recycling within surface waters. This study also encourages future research to further investigate the interactions between functional groups of microbes (e.g. HNA and cyanobacteria) to better constraint modeling in Fe and carbon biogeochemical cycles. MDPI 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9413495/ /pubmed/36014073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081655 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fourquez, Marion
Strzepek, Robert F.
Ellwood, Michael J.
Hassler, Christel
Cabanes, Damien
Eggins, Sam
Pearce, Imojen
Deppeler, Stacy
Trull, Thomas W.
Boyd, Philip W.
Bressac, Matthieu
Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy
title Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy
title_full Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy
title_fullStr Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy
title_full_unstemmed Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy
title_short Phytoplankton Responses to Bacterially Regenerated Iron in a Southern Ocean Eddy
title_sort phytoplankton responses to bacterially regenerated iron in a southern ocean eddy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081655
work_keys_str_mv AT fourquezmarion phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT strzepekrobertf phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT ellwoodmichaelj phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT hasslerchristel phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT cabanesdamien phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT egginssam phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT pearceimojen phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT deppelerstacy phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT trullthomasw phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT boydphilipw phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy
AT bressacmatthieu phytoplanktonresponsestobacteriallyregeneratedironinasouthernoceaneddy