Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved as cancer immunotherapeutic agents for advanced malignant melanoma (MM) in recent years, and nivolumab and ipilimumab are the most widely used ICIs either alone or in combination. However, their efficacy and safety between single and combi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradeep, Jnaneshwari, Win, Thin Thin, Aye, Saint Nway, Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36046644
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.72210
_version_ 1784775890556682240
author Pradeep, Jnaneshwari
Win, Thin Thin
Aye, Saint Nway
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T
author_facet Pradeep, Jnaneshwari
Win, Thin Thin
Aye, Saint Nway
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T
author_sort Pradeep, Jnaneshwari
collection PubMed
description Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved as cancer immunotherapeutic agents for advanced malignant melanoma (MM) in recent years, and nivolumab and ipilimumab are the most widely used ICIs either alone or in combination. However, their efficacy and safety between single and combined ICIs are not clear. This meta-analysis (MA) is aimed to update the efficacy and safety of ICIs by comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of advanced MM. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, EbscoHost and ClinicalTrials.gov for the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy and safety of ICIs between a single ICI and combined ICIs. The outcomes analyzed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on the study heterogeneity. Results: A total of nine RCTs were included in this MA. Regarding the efficacy, combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy showed statistically significant prolonged OS and PFS with HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.53, 0.79], p <0.0001 and HR 0.48, 95% CI [0.38, 0.60], p<0.0001 respectively. Combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed statistically significant longer ORR than monotherapy; with RR 2.15, 95% CI [1.63, 2.84], p <0.00001. In terms of safety, the incidence of all AEs which include any AEs, high-grade, haematological, gastrointestinal, dermatological, pulmonary, liver and endocrine AEs were significantly lower with monotherapy (either nivolumab or ipilimumab) of ICI compared to combination ICI therapy with a p-value <0.00001 to 0.03. Conclusion: Efficacy of the combined nivolumab and ipilimumab was better than a single ICI, especially in the treatment of advanced MM. Although combination therapy showed better efficacy than monotherapy, monotherapy (either nivolumab or ipilimumab) was safer than combination therapy as it tended to decrease the incidence of most of the treatment-related AEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9414012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94140122022-08-30 Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy Pradeep, Jnaneshwari Win, Thin Thin Aye, Saint Nway Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T J Cancer Research Paper Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved as cancer immunotherapeutic agents for advanced malignant melanoma (MM) in recent years, and nivolumab and ipilimumab are the most widely used ICIs either alone or in combination. However, their efficacy and safety between single and combined ICIs are not clear. This meta-analysis (MA) is aimed to update the efficacy and safety of ICIs by comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of advanced MM. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, EbscoHost and ClinicalTrials.gov for the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy and safety of ICIs between a single ICI and combined ICIs. The outcomes analyzed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on the study heterogeneity. Results: A total of nine RCTs were included in this MA. Regarding the efficacy, combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy showed statistically significant prolonged OS and PFS with HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.53, 0.79], p <0.0001 and HR 0.48, 95% CI [0.38, 0.60], p<0.0001 respectively. Combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed statistically significant longer ORR than monotherapy; with RR 2.15, 95% CI [1.63, 2.84], p <0.00001. In terms of safety, the incidence of all AEs which include any AEs, high-grade, haematological, gastrointestinal, dermatological, pulmonary, liver and endocrine AEs were significantly lower with monotherapy (either nivolumab or ipilimumab) of ICI compared to combination ICI therapy with a p-value <0.00001 to 0.03. Conclusion: Efficacy of the combined nivolumab and ipilimumab was better than a single ICI, especially in the treatment of advanced MM. Although combination therapy showed better efficacy than monotherapy, monotherapy (either nivolumab or ipilimumab) was safer than combination therapy as it tended to decrease the incidence of most of the treatment-related AEs. Ivyspring International Publisher 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9414012/ /pubmed/36046644 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.72210 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Pradeep, Jnaneshwari
Win, Thin Thin
Aye, Saint Nway
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T
Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
title Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
title_sort efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis on monotherapy vs combination therapy
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36046644
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.72210
work_keys_str_mv AT pradeepjnaneshwari efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforadvancedmalignantmelanomaametaanalysisonmonotherapyvscombinationtherapy
AT winthinthin efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforadvancedmalignantmelanomaametaanalysisonmonotherapyvscombinationtherapy
AT ayesaintnway efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforadvancedmalignantmelanomaametaanalysisonmonotherapyvscombinationtherapy
AT sreeramareddychandrashekhart efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforadvancedmalignantmelanomaametaanalysisonmonotherapyvscombinationtherapy