Cargando…

Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019

Molecular xenomonitoring (MX), the detection of filarial DNA in mosquitoes using molecular methods (PCR), is a potentially useful surveillance strategy for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. Delay in filarial antigen (Ag) clearance post-treatment is a limitation of using human surveys t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McPherson, Brady, Mayfield, Helen J., McLure, Angus, Gass, Katherine, Naseri, Take, Thomsen, Robert, Williams, Steven A., Pilotte, Nils, Kearns, Therese, Graves, Patricia M., Lau, Colleen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080203
_version_ 1784775930156154880
author McPherson, Brady
Mayfield, Helen J.
McLure, Angus
Gass, Katherine
Naseri, Take
Thomsen, Robert
Williams, Steven A.
Pilotte, Nils
Kearns, Therese
Graves, Patricia M.
Lau, Colleen L.
author_facet McPherson, Brady
Mayfield, Helen J.
McLure, Angus
Gass, Katherine
Naseri, Take
Thomsen, Robert
Williams, Steven A.
Pilotte, Nils
Kearns, Therese
Graves, Patricia M.
Lau, Colleen L.
author_sort McPherson, Brady
collection PubMed
description Molecular xenomonitoring (MX), the detection of filarial DNA in mosquitoes using molecular methods (PCR), is a potentially useful surveillance strategy for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. Delay in filarial antigen (Ag) clearance post-treatment is a limitation of using human surveys to provide an early indicator of the impact of mass drug administration (MDA), and MX may be more useful in this setting. We compared prevalence of infected mosquitoes pre- and post-MDA (2018 and 2019) in 35 primary sampling units (PSUs) in Samoa, and investigated associations between the presence of PCR-positive mosquitoes and Ag-positive humans. We observed a statistically significant decline in estimated mosquito infection prevalence post-MDA at the national level (from 0.9% to 0.3%, OR 0.4) but no change in human Ag prevalence during this time. Ag prevalence in 2019 was higher in randomly selected PSUs where PCR-positive pools were detected (1.4% in ages 5–9; 4.8% in ages ≥10), compared to those where PCR-positive pools were not detected (0.2% in ages 5–9; 3.2% in ages ≥10). Our study provides promising evidence for MX as a complement to human surveys in post-MDA surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9414188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94141882022-08-27 Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019 McPherson, Brady Mayfield, Helen J. McLure, Angus Gass, Katherine Naseri, Take Thomsen, Robert Williams, Steven A. Pilotte, Nils Kearns, Therese Graves, Patricia M. Lau, Colleen L. Trop Med Infect Dis Article Molecular xenomonitoring (MX), the detection of filarial DNA in mosquitoes using molecular methods (PCR), is a potentially useful surveillance strategy for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. Delay in filarial antigen (Ag) clearance post-treatment is a limitation of using human surveys to provide an early indicator of the impact of mass drug administration (MDA), and MX may be more useful in this setting. We compared prevalence of infected mosquitoes pre- and post-MDA (2018 and 2019) in 35 primary sampling units (PSUs) in Samoa, and investigated associations between the presence of PCR-positive mosquitoes and Ag-positive humans. We observed a statistically significant decline in estimated mosquito infection prevalence post-MDA at the national level (from 0.9% to 0.3%, OR 0.4) but no change in human Ag prevalence during this time. Ag prevalence in 2019 was higher in randomly selected PSUs where PCR-positive pools were detected (1.4% in ages 5–9; 4.8% in ages ≥10), compared to those where PCR-positive pools were not detected (0.2% in ages 5–9; 3.2% in ages ≥10). Our study provides promising evidence for MX as a complement to human surveys in post-MDA surveillance. MDPI 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9414188/ /pubmed/36006295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080203 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McPherson, Brady
Mayfield, Helen J.
McLure, Angus
Gass, Katherine
Naseri, Take
Thomsen, Robert
Williams, Steven A.
Pilotte, Nils
Kearns, Therese
Graves, Patricia M.
Lau, Colleen L.
Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
title Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
title_full Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
title_fullStr Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
title_short Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
title_sort evaluating molecular xenomonitoring as a tool for lymphatic filariasis surveillance in samoa, 2018–2019
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080203
work_keys_str_mv AT mcphersonbrady evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT mayfieldhelenj evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT mclureangus evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT gasskatherine evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT naseritake evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT thomsenrobert evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT williamsstevena evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT pilottenils evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT kearnstherese evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT gravespatriciam evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019
AT laucolleenl evaluatingmolecularxenomonitoringasatoolforlymphaticfilariasissurveillanceinsamoa20182019