Cargando…

A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane

Advancements in biomaterial manufacturing technologies calls for improved standards of fabrication and testing. Currently 3D-printable resins are being formulated which exhibit the potential to rapidly prototype biocompatible devices. For validation purposes, 3D-printed materials were subjected to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutsch, Eric, Struber, Andreas, Auer, Georg, Fessmann, Thomas, Lepperdinger, Günter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014153
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081230
_version_ 1784775946183639040
author Lutsch, Eric
Struber, Andreas
Auer, Georg
Fessmann, Thomas
Lepperdinger, Günter
author_facet Lutsch, Eric
Struber, Andreas
Auer, Georg
Fessmann, Thomas
Lepperdinger, Günter
author_sort Lutsch, Eric
collection PubMed
description Advancements in biomaterial manufacturing technologies calls for improved standards of fabrication and testing. Currently 3D-printable resins are being formulated which exhibit the potential to rapidly prototype biocompatible devices. For validation purposes, 3D-printed materials were subjected to a hierarchical validation onto the chorioallantoic membrane of the developing chicken, better known as the HET CAM assay. Working along these lines, prints made from poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEGDA), which had undergone appropriate post-print processing, outperformed other commercial resins. This material passed all tests without displaying adverse effects, as experienced with other resin types. Based on this finding, the micro bioreactors (MBR) design, first made of PDMS and that also passed with cell tests on the HET-CAM, was finally printed in PEGDA, and applied in vivo. Following this workflow shows the applicability of 3D-printable resins for biomedical device manufacturing, consents to adherence to the present standards of the 3R criteria in material research and development, and provides flexibility and fast iteration of design and test cycles for MBR adaptation and optimization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9414255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94142552022-08-27 A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane Lutsch, Eric Struber, Andreas Auer, Georg Fessmann, Thomas Lepperdinger, Günter Micromachines (Basel) Article Advancements in biomaterial manufacturing technologies calls for improved standards of fabrication and testing. Currently 3D-printable resins are being formulated which exhibit the potential to rapidly prototype biocompatible devices. For validation purposes, 3D-printed materials were subjected to a hierarchical validation onto the chorioallantoic membrane of the developing chicken, better known as the HET CAM assay. Working along these lines, prints made from poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEGDA), which had undergone appropriate post-print processing, outperformed other commercial resins. This material passed all tests without displaying adverse effects, as experienced with other resin types. Based on this finding, the micro bioreactors (MBR) design, first made of PDMS and that also passed with cell tests on the HET-CAM, was finally printed in PEGDA, and applied in vivo. Following this workflow shows the applicability of 3D-printable resins for biomedical device manufacturing, consents to adherence to the present standards of the 3R criteria in material research and development, and provides flexibility and fast iteration of design and test cycles for MBR adaptation and optimization. MDPI 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9414255/ /pubmed/36014153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081230 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lutsch, Eric
Struber, Andreas
Auer, Georg
Fessmann, Thomas
Lepperdinger, Günter
A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane
title A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane
title_full A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane
title_fullStr A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane
title_full_unstemmed A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane
title_short A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane
title_sort poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3d-printed micro-bioreactor for direct cell biological implant-testing on the developing chicken chorioallantois membrane
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014153
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081230
work_keys_str_mv AT lutscheric apolyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT struberandreas apolyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT auergeorg apolyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT fessmannthomas apolyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT lepperdingergunter apolyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT lutscheric polyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT struberandreas polyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT auergeorg polyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT fessmannthomas polyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane
AT lepperdingergunter polyethyleneglycoldiacrylate3dprintedmicrobioreactorfordirectcellbiologicalimplanttestingonthedevelopingchickenchorioallantoismembrane