Cargando…
Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis
Ligustici Rhizoma et Radix (LReR) is the dried rhizomes and roots of Ligusticum sinese Oliv. (LS) or Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. (LJ). However, in the market, LS and LJ are frequently confused with each other. Since the volatile oils are both the main active components and quality control i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165325 |
_version_ | 1784775949164740608 |
---|---|
author | Li, Shengmao Huang, Yu Zhang, Fan Ao, Hui Chen, Lu |
author_facet | Li, Shengmao Huang, Yu Zhang, Fan Ao, Hui Chen, Lu |
author_sort | Li, Shengmao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ligustici Rhizoma et Radix (LReR) is the dried rhizomes and roots of Ligusticum sinese Oliv. (LS) or Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. (LJ). However, in the market, LS and LJ are frequently confused with each other. Since the volatile oils are both the main active components and quality control indicators of LReR, a strategy combining gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and chemical pattern recognition (CPR) was used to compare the volatile components of LJ and LS. Total ion chromatography (TIC) revealed that phthalides (i.e., neocnidilide) and phenylpropanoids (i.e., myristicin) could be thought of as the most critical components in the volatile oils of LJ and LS, respectively. In addition, the chemical components of the volatile oils in LJ and LS were successfully distinguished by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA). Moreover, two quality markers, including myristicin and neocnidilide, with a very high discriminative value for the classification of LJ and LS, were found by orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The relative contents of myristicin and neocnidilide were 10.86 ± 6.18% and 26.43 ± 19.63% for LJ, and 47.43 ± 12.66% and 2.87 ± 2.31% for LS. In conclusion, this research has developed an effective approach to discriminating LJ and LS based on volatile oils by combining GC-MS with chemical pattern recognition analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9414267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94142672022-08-27 Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis Li, Shengmao Huang, Yu Zhang, Fan Ao, Hui Chen, Lu Molecules Article Ligustici Rhizoma et Radix (LReR) is the dried rhizomes and roots of Ligusticum sinese Oliv. (LS) or Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. (LJ). However, in the market, LS and LJ are frequently confused with each other. Since the volatile oils are both the main active components and quality control indicators of LReR, a strategy combining gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and chemical pattern recognition (CPR) was used to compare the volatile components of LJ and LS. Total ion chromatography (TIC) revealed that phthalides (i.e., neocnidilide) and phenylpropanoids (i.e., myristicin) could be thought of as the most critical components in the volatile oils of LJ and LS, respectively. In addition, the chemical components of the volatile oils in LJ and LS were successfully distinguished by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA). Moreover, two quality markers, including myristicin and neocnidilide, with a very high discriminative value for the classification of LJ and LS, were found by orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The relative contents of myristicin and neocnidilide were 10.86 ± 6.18% and 26.43 ± 19.63% for LJ, and 47.43 ± 12.66% and 2.87 ± 2.31% for LS. In conclusion, this research has developed an effective approach to discriminating LJ and LS based on volatile oils by combining GC-MS with chemical pattern recognition analysis. MDPI 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9414267/ /pubmed/36014563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165325 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Shengmao Huang, Yu Zhang, Fan Ao, Hui Chen, Lu Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis |
title | Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Volatile Oil between the Ligusticum sinese Oliv. and Ligusticum jeholense Nakai et Kitag. Based on GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of volatile oil between the ligusticum sinese oliv. and ligusticum jeholense nakai et kitag. based on gc-ms and chemical pattern recognition analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lishengmao comparisonofvolatileoilbetweentheligusticumsineseolivandligusticumjeholensenakaietkitagbasedongcmsandchemicalpatternrecognitionanalysis AT huangyu comparisonofvolatileoilbetweentheligusticumsineseolivandligusticumjeholensenakaietkitagbasedongcmsandchemicalpatternrecognitionanalysis AT zhangfan comparisonofvolatileoilbetweentheligusticumsineseolivandligusticumjeholensenakaietkitagbasedongcmsandchemicalpatternrecognitionanalysis AT aohui comparisonofvolatileoilbetweentheligusticumsineseolivandligusticumjeholensenakaietkitagbasedongcmsandchemicalpatternrecognitionanalysis AT chenlu comparisonofvolatileoilbetweentheligusticumsineseolivandligusticumjeholensenakaietkitagbasedongcmsandchemicalpatternrecognitionanalysis |