Cargando…

Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

The objective of this study was to assess the local and systemic adverse reactions after the administration of a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster between December 2021 and February 2022 by comparing the type of mRNA vaccine used as primary series (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) and homologous versus heterologous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parés-Badell, Oleguer, Zules-Oña, Ricardo, Armadans, Lluís, Pinós, Laia, Borrás-Bermejo, Blanca, Otero, Susana, Rodrigo-Pendás, José Ángel, Vivet-Escalé, Martí, Cossio-Gil, Yolima, Agustí, Antònia, Aguilera, Cristina, Campins, Magda, Martínez-Gómez, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081217
_version_ 1784776001502314496
author Parés-Badell, Oleguer
Zules-Oña, Ricardo
Armadans, Lluís
Pinós, Laia
Borrás-Bermejo, Blanca
Otero, Susana
Rodrigo-Pendás, José Ángel
Vivet-Escalé, Martí
Cossio-Gil, Yolima
Agustí, Antònia
Aguilera, Cristina
Campins, Magda
Martínez-Gómez, Xavier
author_facet Parés-Badell, Oleguer
Zules-Oña, Ricardo
Armadans, Lluís
Pinós, Laia
Borrás-Bermejo, Blanca
Otero, Susana
Rodrigo-Pendás, José Ángel
Vivet-Escalé, Martí
Cossio-Gil, Yolima
Agustí, Antònia
Aguilera, Cristina
Campins, Magda
Martínez-Gómez, Xavier
author_sort Parés-Badell, Oleguer
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to assess the local and systemic adverse reactions after the administration of a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster between December 2021 and February 2022 by comparing the type of mRNA vaccine used as primary series (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) and homologous versus heterologous booster in health care workers (HCW). A cross-sectional study was performed in HCW at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona, Spain. A total of 17% of booster recipients responded to the questionnaire. The frequency of reactogenicity after the mRNA-1273 booster (88.5%) was similar to the mRNA-1273 primary doses (85.8%), and higher than the BNT162b2 primary doses (71.1%). The reactogenicity was similar after receiving a heterologous booster compared to a homologous booster (88.0% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.3), and no statistically significant differences were identified in any local or systemic reactions. A higher frequency of medical leave was identified in the homologous booster dose group vs. the heterologous booster dose group (AOR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.00–2.07; p = 0.045). Our findings could be helpful in improving vaccine confidence toward heterologous combinations in the general population and in health care workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9414494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94144942022-08-27 Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Parés-Badell, Oleguer Zules-Oña, Ricardo Armadans, Lluís Pinós, Laia Borrás-Bermejo, Blanca Otero, Susana Rodrigo-Pendás, José Ángel Vivet-Escalé, Martí Cossio-Gil, Yolima Agustí, Antònia Aguilera, Cristina Campins, Magda Martínez-Gómez, Xavier Vaccines (Basel) Article The objective of this study was to assess the local and systemic adverse reactions after the administration of a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster between December 2021 and February 2022 by comparing the type of mRNA vaccine used as primary series (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) and homologous versus heterologous booster in health care workers (HCW). A cross-sectional study was performed in HCW at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona, Spain. A total of 17% of booster recipients responded to the questionnaire. The frequency of reactogenicity after the mRNA-1273 booster (88.5%) was similar to the mRNA-1273 primary doses (85.8%), and higher than the BNT162b2 primary doses (71.1%). The reactogenicity was similar after receiving a heterologous booster compared to a homologous booster (88.0% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.3), and no statistically significant differences were identified in any local or systemic reactions. A higher frequency of medical leave was identified in the homologous booster dose group vs. the heterologous booster dose group (AOR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.00–2.07; p = 0.045). Our findings could be helpful in improving vaccine confidence toward heterologous combinations in the general population and in health care workers. MDPI 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9414494/ /pubmed/36016105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081217 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Parés-Badell, Oleguer
Zules-Oña, Ricardo
Armadans, Lluís
Pinós, Laia
Borrás-Bermejo, Blanca
Otero, Susana
Rodrigo-Pendás, José Ángel
Vivet-Escalé, Martí
Cossio-Gil, Yolima
Agustí, Antònia
Aguilera, Cristina
Campins, Magda
Martínez-Gómez, Xavier
Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination
title Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination
title_full Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination
title_fullStr Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination
title_full_unstemmed Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination
title_short Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination
title_sort reactogenicity to the mrna-1273 booster according to previous mrna covid-19 vaccination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081217
work_keys_str_mv AT paresbadelloleguer reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT zulesonaricardo reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT armadanslluis reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT pinoslaia reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT borrasbermejoblanca reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT oterosusana reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT rodrigopendasjoseangel reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT vivetescalemarti reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT cossiogilyolima reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT agustiantonia reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT aguileracristina reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT campinsmagda reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination
AT martinezgomezxavier reactogenicitytothemrna1273boosteraccordingtopreviousmrnacovid19vaccination