Cargando…

Performance Prediction of Erosive Wear of Steel for Two-Phase Flow in an Inverse U-Bend

Erosion of the elbow due to non-Newtonian viscous slurry flows is often observed in hydrocarbon transportation pipelines. This paper intends to study the erosion behavior of double offset U-bends and 180° U-bends for two-phase (liquid-sand) flow. A numerical simulation was conducted using the Discre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahman, Saifur, Khan, Rehan, Niazi, Usama Muhammad, Legutko, Stanislaw, Khan, Muhammad Ali, Ahmed, Bilal Anjum, Petrů, Jana, Hajnyš, Jiří, Irfan, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9414689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36013695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15165558
Descripción
Sumario:Erosion of the elbow due to non-Newtonian viscous slurry flows is often observed in hydrocarbon transportation pipelines. This paper intends to study the erosion behavior of double offset U-bends and 180° U-bends for two-phase (liquid-sand) flow. A numerical simulation was conducted using the Discrete Phase Model (DPM) on carbon steel pipe bends with a 40 mm diameter and an R/D ratio of 1.5. The validity of the erosion model has been established by comparing it with the results quantified in the literature by experiment. While the maximum erosive wear rates of all evaluated cases were found to be quite different, the maximum erosion locations have been identified between 150° and 180° downstream at the outer curvature. It was seen that with the increase in disperse phase diameter, the erosive wear rate and impact area increased. Moreover, with the change of configuration from a 180° U-bend to a double offset U-bend, the influence of turbulence on the transit of the disperse phase decreases as the flow approaches downstream and results in less erosive wear in a double offset U-bend. Furthermore, the simulation results manifest that the erosive wear increases with an increase in flow velocity, and the erosion rate of the double offset U-bend was nearly 8.58 times less than the 180° U-bend for a carrier fluid velocity of 2 m/s and 1.82 times less for 4 m/s carrier fluid velocity. The erosion rate of the double offset U-bend was reduced by 120% compared to the 180° U-bend for 6 m/s in liquid-solid flow.