Cargando…
Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
Polymer surfaces are increasingly being functionalized with micro- and nano- surface features using mass replication methods such as injection moulding. An example of these are microneedle arrays, which contain needle-like microscopic structures, which facilitate drug or vaccine delivery in a minima...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081280 |
_version_ | 1784776142634352640 |
---|---|
author | Evens, Tim Castagne, Sylvie Seveno, David Van Bael, Albert |
author_facet | Evens, Tim Castagne, Sylvie Seveno, David Van Bael, Albert |
author_sort | Evens, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Polymer surfaces are increasingly being functionalized with micro- and nano- surface features using mass replication methods such as injection moulding. An example of these are microneedle arrays, which contain needle-like microscopic structures, which facilitate drug or vaccine delivery in a minimally invasive way. In this study, the replication fidelity of two types of solid polycarbonate microneedles was investigated using injection compression moulding and conventional injection moulding. Using a full factorial design of experiments for the injection moulding process, it was found that the volumetric injection rate had the largest positive effect on the replication fidelity. The mould temperature and holding pressure were also found to have a positive effect, while the effect of the melt temperature was found to be insignificant for the considered temperature range. For the injection compression moulding process, it was found that a larger compression stroke resulted in a better replication fidelity. A comparison between the replication fidelity for the injection moulding and injection compression moulding indicated that the injection compression moulding process resulted in a higher and more uniform replication fidelity. Using finite element flow simulations, a higher and more evenly distributed cavity pressure was observed compared to the conventional injection moulding process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9415074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94150742022-08-27 Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding Evens, Tim Castagne, Sylvie Seveno, David Van Bael, Albert Micromachines (Basel) Article Polymer surfaces are increasingly being functionalized with micro- and nano- surface features using mass replication methods such as injection moulding. An example of these are microneedle arrays, which contain needle-like microscopic structures, which facilitate drug or vaccine delivery in a minimally invasive way. In this study, the replication fidelity of two types of solid polycarbonate microneedles was investigated using injection compression moulding and conventional injection moulding. Using a full factorial design of experiments for the injection moulding process, it was found that the volumetric injection rate had the largest positive effect on the replication fidelity. The mould temperature and holding pressure were also found to have a positive effect, while the effect of the melt temperature was found to be insignificant for the considered temperature range. For the injection compression moulding process, it was found that a larger compression stroke resulted in a better replication fidelity. A comparison between the replication fidelity for the injection moulding and injection compression moulding indicated that the injection compression moulding process resulted in a higher and more uniform replication fidelity. Using finite element flow simulations, a higher and more evenly distributed cavity pressure was observed compared to the conventional injection moulding process. MDPI 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9415074/ /pubmed/36014202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081280 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Evens, Tim Castagne, Sylvie Seveno, David Van Bael, Albert Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding |
title | Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding |
title_full | Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding |
title_short | Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding |
title_sort | comparing the replication fidelity of solid microneedles using injection compression moulding and conventional injection moulding |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evenstim comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding AT castagnesylvie comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding AT sevenodavid comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding AT vanbaelalbert comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding |