Cargando…

Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding

Polymer surfaces are increasingly being functionalized with micro- and nano- surface features using mass replication methods such as injection moulding. An example of these are microneedle arrays, which contain needle-like microscopic structures, which facilitate drug or vaccine delivery in a minima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evens, Tim, Castagne, Sylvie, Seveno, David, Van Bael, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081280
_version_ 1784776142634352640
author Evens, Tim
Castagne, Sylvie
Seveno, David
Van Bael, Albert
author_facet Evens, Tim
Castagne, Sylvie
Seveno, David
Van Bael, Albert
author_sort Evens, Tim
collection PubMed
description Polymer surfaces are increasingly being functionalized with micro- and nano- surface features using mass replication methods such as injection moulding. An example of these are microneedle arrays, which contain needle-like microscopic structures, which facilitate drug or vaccine delivery in a minimally invasive way. In this study, the replication fidelity of two types of solid polycarbonate microneedles was investigated using injection compression moulding and conventional injection moulding. Using a full factorial design of experiments for the injection moulding process, it was found that the volumetric injection rate had the largest positive effect on the replication fidelity. The mould temperature and holding pressure were also found to have a positive effect, while the effect of the melt temperature was found to be insignificant for the considered temperature range. For the injection compression moulding process, it was found that a larger compression stroke resulted in a better replication fidelity. A comparison between the replication fidelity for the injection moulding and injection compression moulding indicated that the injection compression moulding process resulted in a higher and more uniform replication fidelity. Using finite element flow simulations, a higher and more evenly distributed cavity pressure was observed compared to the conventional injection moulding process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9415074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94150742022-08-27 Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding Evens, Tim Castagne, Sylvie Seveno, David Van Bael, Albert Micromachines (Basel) Article Polymer surfaces are increasingly being functionalized with micro- and nano- surface features using mass replication methods such as injection moulding. An example of these are microneedle arrays, which contain needle-like microscopic structures, which facilitate drug or vaccine delivery in a minimally invasive way. In this study, the replication fidelity of two types of solid polycarbonate microneedles was investigated using injection compression moulding and conventional injection moulding. Using a full factorial design of experiments for the injection moulding process, it was found that the volumetric injection rate had the largest positive effect on the replication fidelity. The mould temperature and holding pressure were also found to have a positive effect, while the effect of the melt temperature was found to be insignificant for the considered temperature range. For the injection compression moulding process, it was found that a larger compression stroke resulted in a better replication fidelity. A comparison between the replication fidelity for the injection moulding and injection compression moulding indicated that the injection compression moulding process resulted in a higher and more uniform replication fidelity. Using finite element flow simulations, a higher and more evenly distributed cavity pressure was observed compared to the conventional injection moulding process. MDPI 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9415074/ /pubmed/36014202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081280 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Evens, Tim
Castagne, Sylvie
Seveno, David
Van Bael, Albert
Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
title Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
title_full Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
title_fullStr Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
title_short Comparing the Replication Fidelity of Solid Microneedles Using Injection Compression Moulding and Conventional Injection Moulding
title_sort comparing the replication fidelity of solid microneedles using injection compression moulding and conventional injection moulding
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36014202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081280
work_keys_str_mv AT evenstim comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding
AT castagnesylvie comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding
AT sevenodavid comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding
AT vanbaelalbert comparingthereplicationfidelityofsolidmicroneedlesusinginjectioncompressionmouldingandconventionalinjectionmoulding