Cargando…

The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser

Cumulative crop recovery of synthetic fertiliser nitrogen (N) over several cropping seasons (legacy effect) generally receives limited attention. The increment in crop N uptake after the first‐season uptake from fertiliser can be expressed as a fraction (∆RE) of the annual N application rate. This s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vonk, Wytse J., Hijbeek, Renske, Glendining, Margaret J., Powlson, David S., Bhogal, Anne, Merbach, Ines, Silva, João Vasco, Poffenbarger, Hanna J., Dhillon, Jagman, Sieling, Klaus, ten Berge, Hein F. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13238
_version_ 1784776155437465600
author Vonk, Wytse J.
Hijbeek, Renske
Glendining, Margaret J.
Powlson, David S.
Bhogal, Anne
Merbach, Ines
Silva, João Vasco
Poffenbarger, Hanna J.
Dhillon, Jagman
Sieling, Klaus
ten Berge, Hein F. M.
author_facet Vonk, Wytse J.
Hijbeek, Renske
Glendining, Margaret J.
Powlson, David S.
Bhogal, Anne
Merbach, Ines
Silva, João Vasco
Poffenbarger, Hanna J.
Dhillon, Jagman
Sieling, Klaus
ten Berge, Hein F. M.
author_sort Vonk, Wytse J.
collection PubMed
description Cumulative crop recovery of synthetic fertiliser nitrogen (N) over several cropping seasons (legacy effect) generally receives limited attention. The increment in crop N uptake after the first‐season uptake from fertiliser can be expressed as a fraction (∆RE) of the annual N application rate. This study aims to quantify ∆RE using data from nine long‐term experiments (LTEs). As such, ∆RE is the difference between first season (RE(1st)) and long‐term (RE(LT)) recovery of synthetic fertiliser N. In this study, RE(1st) was assessed either by the (15)N isotope method or by a zero‐N subplot freshly superimposed on a long‐term fertilised LTE treatment plot. RE(LT) was calculated by comparing N uptake in the total aboveground crop biomass between a long‐term fertilised and long‐term control (zero‐N) treatment. Using a mixed linear effect model, the effects of climate, crop type, experiment duration, average N rate, and soil clay content on ∆RE were evaluated. Because the experimental setup required for the calculation of ∆RE is relatively rare, only nine suitable LTEs were found. Across these nine LTEs in Europe and North America, the mean ∆RE was 24.4% (±12.0%, 95% CI) of annual N application, with higher values for winter wheat than for maize. This result shows that fertiliser‐N retained in the soil and stubble may contribute substantially to crop N uptake in subsequent years. Our results suggest that an initial recovery of 43.8% (±11%, 95% CI) of N application may increase to around 66.0% (±15%, 95% CI) on average over time. Furthermore, we found that ∆RE was not clearly related to long‐term changes in topsoil total N stock. Our findings show that the—often used—first‐year recovery of synthetic fertiliser N application does not express the full effect of fertiliser application on crop nutrition. The fertiliser contribution to soil N supply should be accounted for when exploring future scenarios on N cycling, including crop N requirements and N balance schemes. HIGHLIGHTS: Nine long‐term cereal experiments in Europe and USA were analysed for long‐term crop N recovery of synthetic N fertiliser. On average, and with application rates between 34 and 269 kg N/ha, crop N recovery increased from 43.8% in the first season to 66.0% in the long term. Delta recovery was larger for winter wheat than maize. Observed increases in crop N uptake were not explained by proportionate increases in topsoil total N stock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9415127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94151272022-08-31 The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser Vonk, Wytse J. Hijbeek, Renske Glendining, Margaret J. Powlson, David S. Bhogal, Anne Merbach, Ines Silva, João Vasco Poffenbarger, Hanna J. Dhillon, Jagman Sieling, Klaus ten Berge, Hein F. M. Eur J Soil Sci Original Articles Cumulative crop recovery of synthetic fertiliser nitrogen (N) over several cropping seasons (legacy effect) generally receives limited attention. The increment in crop N uptake after the first‐season uptake from fertiliser can be expressed as a fraction (∆RE) of the annual N application rate. This study aims to quantify ∆RE using data from nine long‐term experiments (LTEs). As such, ∆RE is the difference between first season (RE(1st)) and long‐term (RE(LT)) recovery of synthetic fertiliser N. In this study, RE(1st) was assessed either by the (15)N isotope method or by a zero‐N subplot freshly superimposed on a long‐term fertilised LTE treatment plot. RE(LT) was calculated by comparing N uptake in the total aboveground crop biomass between a long‐term fertilised and long‐term control (zero‐N) treatment. Using a mixed linear effect model, the effects of climate, crop type, experiment duration, average N rate, and soil clay content on ∆RE were evaluated. Because the experimental setup required for the calculation of ∆RE is relatively rare, only nine suitable LTEs were found. Across these nine LTEs in Europe and North America, the mean ∆RE was 24.4% (±12.0%, 95% CI) of annual N application, with higher values for winter wheat than for maize. This result shows that fertiliser‐N retained in the soil and stubble may contribute substantially to crop N uptake in subsequent years. Our results suggest that an initial recovery of 43.8% (±11%, 95% CI) of N application may increase to around 66.0% (±15%, 95% CI) on average over time. Furthermore, we found that ∆RE was not clearly related to long‐term changes in topsoil total N stock. Our findings show that the—often used—first‐year recovery of synthetic fertiliser N application does not express the full effect of fertiliser application on crop nutrition. The fertiliser contribution to soil N supply should be accounted for when exploring future scenarios on N cycling, including crop N requirements and N balance schemes. HIGHLIGHTS: Nine long‐term cereal experiments in Europe and USA were analysed for long‐term crop N recovery of synthetic N fertiliser. On average, and with application rates between 34 and 269 kg N/ha, crop N recovery increased from 43.8% in the first season to 66.0% in the long term. Delta recovery was larger for winter wheat than maize. Observed increases in crop N uptake were not explained by proportionate increases in topsoil total N stock. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-05-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9415127/ /pubmed/36060860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13238 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Soil Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society of Soil Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Vonk, Wytse J.
Hijbeek, Renske
Glendining, Margaret J.
Powlson, David S.
Bhogal, Anne
Merbach, Ines
Silva, João Vasco
Poffenbarger, Hanna J.
Dhillon, Jagman
Sieling, Klaus
ten Berge, Hein F. M.
The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser
title The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser
title_full The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser
title_fullStr The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser
title_full_unstemmed The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser
title_short The legacy effect of synthetic N fertiliser
title_sort legacy effect of synthetic n fertiliser
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13238
work_keys_str_mv AT vonkwytsej thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT hijbeekrenske thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT glendiningmargaretj thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT powlsondavids thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT bhogalanne thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT merbachines thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT silvajoaovasco thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT poffenbargerhannaj thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT dhillonjagman thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT sielingklaus thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT tenbergeheinfm thelegacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT vonkwytsej legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT hijbeekrenske legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT glendiningmargaretj legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT powlsondavids legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT bhogalanne legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT merbachines legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT silvajoaovasco legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT poffenbargerhannaj legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT dhillonjagman legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT sielingklaus legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser
AT tenbergeheinfm legacyeffectofsyntheticnfertiliser