Cargando…

Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments

In the present work, three LiDAR technologies (Faro Focus 3D X130—Terrestrial Laser Scanner, TLS-, Kaarta Stencil 2–16—Mobile mapping system, MMS-, and DJI Zenmuse L1—Airborne LiDAR sensor, ALS-) have been tested and compared in order to assess the performances in surveying built heritage in vegetat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maté-González, Miguel Ángel, Di Pietra, Vincenzo, Piras, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22166314
_version_ 1784776373206777856
author Maté-González, Miguel Ángel
Di Pietra, Vincenzo
Piras, Marco
author_facet Maté-González, Miguel Ángel
Di Pietra, Vincenzo
Piras, Marco
author_sort Maté-González, Miguel Ángel
collection PubMed
description In the present work, three LiDAR technologies (Faro Focus 3D X130—Terrestrial Laser Scanner, TLS-, Kaarta Stencil 2–16—Mobile mapping system, MMS-, and DJI Zenmuse L1—Airborne LiDAR sensor, ALS-) have been tested and compared in order to assess the performances in surveying built heritage in vegetated areas. Each of the mentioned devices has their limits of usability, and different methods to capture and generate 3D point clouds need to be applied. In addition, it has been necessary to apply a methodology to be able to position all the point clouds in the same reference system. While the TLS scans and the MMS data have been geo-referenced using a set of vertical markers and sphere measured by a GNSS receiver in RTK mode, the ALS model has been geo-referenced by the GNSS receiver integrated in the unmanned aerial system (UAS), which presents different characteristics and accuracies. The resulting point clouds have been analyzed and compared, focusing attention on the number of points acquired by the different systems, the density, and the nearest neighbor distance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9416006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94160062022-08-27 Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments Maté-González, Miguel Ángel Di Pietra, Vincenzo Piras, Marco Sensors (Basel) Article In the present work, three LiDAR technologies (Faro Focus 3D X130—Terrestrial Laser Scanner, TLS-, Kaarta Stencil 2–16—Mobile mapping system, MMS-, and DJI Zenmuse L1—Airborne LiDAR sensor, ALS-) have been tested and compared in order to assess the performances in surveying built heritage in vegetated areas. Each of the mentioned devices has their limits of usability, and different methods to capture and generate 3D point clouds need to be applied. In addition, it has been necessary to apply a methodology to be able to position all the point clouds in the same reference system. While the TLS scans and the MMS data have been geo-referenced using a set of vertical markers and sphere measured by a GNSS receiver in RTK mode, the ALS model has been geo-referenced by the GNSS receiver integrated in the unmanned aerial system (UAS), which presents different characteristics and accuracies. The resulting point clouds have been analyzed and compared, focusing attention on the number of points acquired by the different systems, the density, and the nearest neighbor distance. MDPI 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9416006/ /pubmed/36016073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22166314 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Maté-González, Miguel Ángel
Di Pietra, Vincenzo
Piras, Marco
Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments
title Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments
title_full Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments
title_short Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments
title_sort evaluation of different lidar technologies for the documentation of forgotten cultural heritage under forest environments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22166314
work_keys_str_mv AT mategonzalezmiguelangel evaluationofdifferentlidartechnologiesforthedocumentationofforgottenculturalheritageunderforestenvironments
AT dipietravincenzo evaluationofdifferentlidartechnologiesforthedocumentationofforgottenculturalheritageunderforestenvironments
AT pirasmarco evaluationofdifferentlidartechnologiesforthedocumentationofforgottenculturalheritageunderforestenvironments