Cargando…

Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review

The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic investigation and analysis of different drug extraction methods, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biological fluid samples, for Liquid Chromatography in Mass Spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS). A search was carried out in the main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva, Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes, Weckwerth, Giovana Maria, Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro, Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso, Santos, Carlos Ferreira, Calvo, Adriana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080751
_version_ 1784776428762431488
author Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva
Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes
Weckwerth, Giovana Maria
Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro
Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso
Santos, Carlos Ferreira
Calvo, Adriana Maria
author_facet Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva
Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes
Weckwerth, Giovana Maria
Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro
Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso
Santos, Carlos Ferreira
Calvo, Adriana Maria
author_sort Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic investigation and analysis of different drug extraction methods, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biological fluid samples, for Liquid Chromatography in Mass Spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS). A search was carried out in the main databases between 1999 and 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Data were obtained through PubMed, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the Boolean operators AND and OR. Studies were pre-selected by title and abstract by two independent reviewers. The selected texts were read in full, and only those that were complete and compatible with the inclusion and exclusion criteria were eligible for this research. A total of 248 references were obtained in the databases. After removing the duplicates and analyzing the titles and abstracts, 79 references were evaluated and passed to the next phase, which comprised the complete reading of the article. A total of 39 publications were eligible for this study. In 52% of the studies, the authors used the liquid–liquid extraction method (LLE), while in 41%, the solid-phase extraction method (SPE) was used. A total of 5% used microextraction methods and 2% used less-conventional techniques. The literature on the main methods used, the LLE and SPE methods, is extensive and consolidated; however, we found other studies that reported modifications of these traditional techniques, which were equally validated for use in LC-MS/MS. From this review, it is concluded that the diversity of techniques, reliability, and practical information about each analytical method used in this study can be adapted to advances in LC-MS/MS techniques; however, more ecological, economic, and sustainable approaches should be explored in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9416228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94162282022-08-27 Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes Weckwerth, Giovana Maria Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso Santos, Carlos Ferreira Calvo, Adriana Maria Metabolites Review The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic investigation and analysis of different drug extraction methods, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biological fluid samples, for Liquid Chromatography in Mass Spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS). A search was carried out in the main databases between 1999 and 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Data were obtained through PubMed, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the Boolean operators AND and OR. Studies were pre-selected by title and abstract by two independent reviewers. The selected texts were read in full, and only those that were complete and compatible with the inclusion and exclusion criteria were eligible for this research. A total of 248 references were obtained in the databases. After removing the duplicates and analyzing the titles and abstracts, 79 references were evaluated and passed to the next phase, which comprised the complete reading of the article. A total of 39 publications were eligible for this study. In 52% of the studies, the authors used the liquid–liquid extraction method (LLE), while in 41%, the solid-phase extraction method (SPE) was used. A total of 5% used microextraction methods and 2% used less-conventional techniques. The literature on the main methods used, the LLE and SPE methods, is extensive and consolidated; however, we found other studies that reported modifications of these traditional techniques, which were equally validated for use in LC-MS/MS. From this review, it is concluded that the diversity of techniques, reliability, and practical information about each analytical method used in this study can be adapted to advances in LC-MS/MS techniques; however, more ecological, economic, and sustainable approaches should be explored in the future. MDPI 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9416228/ /pubmed/36005622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080751 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva
Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes
Weckwerth, Giovana Maria
Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro
Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso
Santos, Carlos Ferreira
Calvo, Adriana Maria
Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
title Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
title_full Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
title_short Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
title_sort analysis of different methods of extracting nsaids in biological fluid samples for lc-ms/ms assays: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080751
work_keys_str_mv AT siqueirasandrinvivianesilva analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview
AT oliveiragabrielamoraes analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview
AT weckwerthgiovanamaria analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview
AT polanconelsonleoneldelhierro analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview
AT fariaflavioaugustocardoso analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview
AT santoscarlosferreira analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview
AT calvoadrianamaria analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview