Cargando…
Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review
The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic investigation and analysis of different drug extraction methods, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biological fluid samples, for Liquid Chromatography in Mass Spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS). A search was carried out in the main...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080751 |
_version_ | 1784776428762431488 |
---|---|
author | Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes Weckwerth, Giovana Maria Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso Santos, Carlos Ferreira Calvo, Adriana Maria |
author_facet | Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes Weckwerth, Giovana Maria Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso Santos, Carlos Ferreira Calvo, Adriana Maria |
author_sort | Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic investigation and analysis of different drug extraction methods, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biological fluid samples, for Liquid Chromatography in Mass Spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS). A search was carried out in the main databases between 1999 and 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Data were obtained through PubMed, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the Boolean operators AND and OR. Studies were pre-selected by title and abstract by two independent reviewers. The selected texts were read in full, and only those that were complete and compatible with the inclusion and exclusion criteria were eligible for this research. A total of 248 references were obtained in the databases. After removing the duplicates and analyzing the titles and abstracts, 79 references were evaluated and passed to the next phase, which comprised the complete reading of the article. A total of 39 publications were eligible for this study. In 52% of the studies, the authors used the liquid–liquid extraction method (LLE), while in 41%, the solid-phase extraction method (SPE) was used. A total of 5% used microextraction methods and 2% used less-conventional techniques. The literature on the main methods used, the LLE and SPE methods, is extensive and consolidated; however, we found other studies that reported modifications of these traditional techniques, which were equally validated for use in LC-MS/MS. From this review, it is concluded that the diversity of techniques, reliability, and practical information about each analytical method used in this study can be adapted to advances in LC-MS/MS techniques; however, more ecological, economic, and sustainable approaches should be explored in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9416228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94162282022-08-27 Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes Weckwerth, Giovana Maria Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso Santos, Carlos Ferreira Calvo, Adriana Maria Metabolites Review The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic investigation and analysis of different drug extraction methods, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biological fluid samples, for Liquid Chromatography in Mass Spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS). A search was carried out in the main databases between 1999 and 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Data were obtained through PubMed, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the Boolean operators AND and OR. Studies were pre-selected by title and abstract by two independent reviewers. The selected texts were read in full, and only those that were complete and compatible with the inclusion and exclusion criteria were eligible for this research. A total of 248 references were obtained in the databases. After removing the duplicates and analyzing the titles and abstracts, 79 references were evaluated and passed to the next phase, which comprised the complete reading of the article. A total of 39 publications were eligible for this study. In 52% of the studies, the authors used the liquid–liquid extraction method (LLE), while in 41%, the solid-phase extraction method (SPE) was used. A total of 5% used microextraction methods and 2% used less-conventional techniques. The literature on the main methods used, the LLE and SPE methods, is extensive and consolidated; however, we found other studies that reported modifications of these traditional techniques, which were equally validated for use in LC-MS/MS. From this review, it is concluded that the diversity of techniques, reliability, and practical information about each analytical method used in this study can be adapted to advances in LC-MS/MS techniques; however, more ecological, economic, and sustainable approaches should be explored in the future. MDPI 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9416228/ /pubmed/36005622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080751 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Siqueira Sandrin, Viviane Silva Oliveira, Gabriela Moraes Weckwerth, Giovana Maria Polanco, Nelson Leonel Del Hierro Faria, Flávio Augusto Cardoso Santos, Carlos Ferreira Calvo, Adriana Maria Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review |
title | Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review |
title_full | Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review |
title_short | Analysis of Different Methods of Extracting NSAIDs in Biological Fluid Samples for LC-MS/MS Assays: Scoping Review |
title_sort | analysis of different methods of extracting nsaids in biological fluid samples for lc-ms/ms assays: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siqueirasandrinvivianesilva analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview AT oliveiragabrielamoraes analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview AT weckwerthgiovanamaria analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview AT polanconelsonleoneldelhierro analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview AT fariaflavioaugustocardoso analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview AT santoscarlosferreira analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview AT calvoadrianamaria analysisofdifferentmethodsofextractingnsaidsinbiologicalfluidsamplesforlcmsmsassaysscopingreview |