Cargando…

Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure

Organophosphorus neurotoxic agents (OPNAs) seriously damage the nervous system, inhibiting AChE activity and threatening human health and life. Timely and accurate detection of biomarkers in biomedical samples is an important means for identifying OPNA exposure, helping to recognize and clarify its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jin, Lu, Xiaogang, Gao, Runli, Pei, Chengxin, Wang, Hongmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10080439
_version_ 1784776474101809152
author Wang, Jin
Lu, Xiaogang
Gao, Runli
Pei, Chengxin
Wang, Hongmei
author_facet Wang, Jin
Lu, Xiaogang
Gao, Runli
Pei, Chengxin
Wang, Hongmei
author_sort Wang, Jin
collection PubMed
description Organophosphorus neurotoxic agents (OPNAs) seriously damage the nervous system, inhibiting AChE activity and threatening human health and life. Timely and accurate detection of biomarkers in biomedical samples is an important means for identifying OPNA exposure, helping to recognize and clarify its characteristics and providing unambiguous forensic evidence for retrospective research. It is therefore necessary to summarize the varieties of biomarkers, recognize their various characteristics, and understand the principal research methods for these biomarkers in the retrospective detection of OPNA exposure. Common biomarkers include mainly intact agents, degradation products and protein adducts. Direct agent identification in basic experimental research was successfully applied to the detection of free OPNAs, however, this method is not applicable to actual biomedical samples because the high reactivity of OPNAs promotes rapid metabolism. Stepwise degradation products are important targets for retrospective research and are usually analyzed using a GC–MS, or an LC–MS system after derivatization. The smaller window of detection time requires that sampling be accomplished within 48 h, increasing the obstacles to determining OPNA exposure. For this reason, the focus of retrospective identification of OPNA exposure has shifted to protein adducts with a longer lifetime. Compared to the fluoride-induced reactivation method, which cannot be used for aged adducts, digestive peptide analysis is the more elegant method for detecting various adducts, identifying more active sites, exploring potential biomarkers and excavating characteristic ions. Retrospective identification of biomarkers after OPNA poisoning is of primary importance, providing unambiguous evidence for forensic analysis in actual cases and judgment of chemical accidents. At present, degradation products, the nonapeptide from BChE adducts and Y411 from human serum adducts are used successfully in actual cases of OPNA exposure. However, more potential biomarkers are still in the discovery stage, which may prove inconclusive. Therefore, there is an urgent need for research that screens biomarker candidates with high reactivity and good reliability from the potential candidates. In addition, mass spectrometry detection with high resolution and reactivity and an accurate data processing system in the scanning mode must also be further improved for the retrospective identification of unknown agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9416412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94164122022-08-27 Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure Wang, Jin Lu, Xiaogang Gao, Runli Pei, Chengxin Wang, Hongmei Toxics Review Organophosphorus neurotoxic agents (OPNAs) seriously damage the nervous system, inhibiting AChE activity and threatening human health and life. Timely and accurate detection of biomarkers in biomedical samples is an important means for identifying OPNA exposure, helping to recognize and clarify its characteristics and providing unambiguous forensic evidence for retrospective research. It is therefore necessary to summarize the varieties of biomarkers, recognize their various characteristics, and understand the principal research methods for these biomarkers in the retrospective detection of OPNA exposure. Common biomarkers include mainly intact agents, degradation products and protein adducts. Direct agent identification in basic experimental research was successfully applied to the detection of free OPNAs, however, this method is not applicable to actual biomedical samples because the high reactivity of OPNAs promotes rapid metabolism. Stepwise degradation products are important targets for retrospective research and are usually analyzed using a GC–MS, or an LC–MS system after derivatization. The smaller window of detection time requires that sampling be accomplished within 48 h, increasing the obstacles to determining OPNA exposure. For this reason, the focus of retrospective identification of OPNA exposure has shifted to protein adducts with a longer lifetime. Compared to the fluoride-induced reactivation method, which cannot be used for aged adducts, digestive peptide analysis is the more elegant method for detecting various adducts, identifying more active sites, exploring potential biomarkers and excavating characteristic ions. Retrospective identification of biomarkers after OPNA poisoning is of primary importance, providing unambiguous evidence for forensic analysis in actual cases and judgment of chemical accidents. At present, degradation products, the nonapeptide from BChE adducts and Y411 from human serum adducts are used successfully in actual cases of OPNA exposure. However, more potential biomarkers are still in the discovery stage, which may prove inconclusive. Therefore, there is an urgent need for research that screens biomarker candidates with high reactivity and good reliability from the potential candidates. In addition, mass spectrometry detection with high resolution and reactivity and an accurate data processing system in the scanning mode must also be further improved for the retrospective identification of unknown agents. MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9416412/ /pubmed/36006118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10080439 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Jin
Lu, Xiaogang
Gao, Runli
Pei, Chengxin
Wang, Hongmei
Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure
title Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure
title_full Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure
title_fullStr Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure
title_full_unstemmed Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure
title_short Current Progress for Retrospective Identification of Nerve Agent Biomarkers in Biological Samples after Exposure
title_sort current progress for retrospective identification of nerve agent biomarkers in biological samples after exposure
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10080439
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjin currentprogressforretrospectiveidentificationofnerveagentbiomarkersinbiologicalsamplesafterexposure
AT luxiaogang currentprogressforretrospectiveidentificationofnerveagentbiomarkersinbiologicalsamplesafterexposure
AT gaorunli currentprogressforretrospectiveidentificationofnerveagentbiomarkersinbiologicalsamplesafterexposure
AT peichengxin currentprogressforretrospectiveidentificationofnerveagentbiomarkersinbiologicalsamplesafterexposure
AT wanghongmei currentprogressforretrospectiveidentificationofnerveagentbiomarkersinbiologicalsamplesafterexposure