Cargando…

Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods

AIM: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edentulous mandibular model was used to install fou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro, Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo, Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves, Germano, Adriano Rocha, Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511059
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22
_version_ 1784776591323168768
author Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro
Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo
Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves
Germano, Adriano Rocha
Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto
author_facet Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro
Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo
Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves
Germano, Adriano Rocha
Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto
author_sort Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro
collection PubMed
description AIM: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edentulous mandibular model was used to install four implants and abutments, recommending 6 distances between the implants. Scans were performed using an intraoral (SI) and extraoral (SE) scanner for each studied group: Scanning with the scan bodies (SB) and device (SD) (n = 10). The files were imported into a surface evaluation program to assess 3D deviations and measure distances between implants. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Precision was assessed as the difference between files (Kruskal–Wallis test), while trueness was assessed from the difference between scans, applying the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: As for the 3D deviations, SI showed accuracy, for the faces and positions of the implants in relation to the SE, in both scanning methods (P < 0.05). Regarding the capture of distances between implants, the SD scan obtained better trueness than the SB group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the type and scanning methods used did not influence the 3D deviations, while for distances, scanning with the device had better trueness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9416955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94169552023-07-01 Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves Germano, Adriano Rocha Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto J Indian Prosthodont Soc Research AIM: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edentulous mandibular model was used to install four implants and abutments, recommending 6 distances between the implants. Scans were performed using an intraoral (SI) and extraoral (SE) scanner for each studied group: Scanning with the scan bodies (SB) and device (SD) (n = 10). The files were imported into a surface evaluation program to assess 3D deviations and measure distances between implants. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Precision was assessed as the difference between files (Kruskal–Wallis test), while trueness was assessed from the difference between scans, applying the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: As for the 3D deviations, SI showed accuracy, for the faces and positions of the implants in relation to the SE, in both scanning methods (P < 0.05). Regarding the capture of distances between implants, the SD scan obtained better trueness than the SB group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the type and scanning methods used did not influence the 3D deviations, while for distances, scanning with the device had better trueness. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9416955/ /pubmed/36511059 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research
Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro
Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo
Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves
Germano, Adriano Rocha
Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto
Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
title Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
title_full Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
title_fullStr Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
title_short Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
title_sort accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511059
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiraanalarissecarneiro accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods
AT segundohenriquevieiramelo accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods
AT juniorluizcarlosalves accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods
AT germanoadrianorocha accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods
AT carreiroadrianadafonteporto accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods