Cargando…
Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods
AIM: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edentulous mandibular model was used to install fou...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511059 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22 |
_version_ | 1784776591323168768 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves Germano, Adriano Rocha Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto |
author_facet | Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves Germano, Adriano Rocha Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto |
author_sort | Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edentulous mandibular model was used to install four implants and abutments, recommending 6 distances between the implants. Scans were performed using an intraoral (SI) and extraoral (SE) scanner for each studied group: Scanning with the scan bodies (SB) and device (SD) (n = 10). The files were imported into a surface evaluation program to assess 3D deviations and measure distances between implants. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Precision was assessed as the difference between files (Kruskal–Wallis test), while trueness was assessed from the difference between scans, applying the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: As for the 3D deviations, SI showed accuracy, for the faces and positions of the implants in relation to the SE, in both scanning methods (P < 0.05). Regarding the capture of distances between implants, the SD scan obtained better trueness than the SB group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the type and scanning methods used did not influence the 3D deviations, while for distances, scanning with the device had better trueness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9416955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94169552023-07-01 Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves Germano, Adriano Rocha Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto J Indian Prosthodont Soc Research AIM: Evaluate the accuracy between the intraoral and extraoral scanning regarding the three dimensional (3D) deviation and distances between the implants, through 2 scanning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edentulous mandibular model was used to install four implants and abutments, recommending 6 distances between the implants. Scans were performed using an intraoral (SI) and extraoral (SE) scanner for each studied group: Scanning with the scan bodies (SB) and device (SD) (n = 10). The files were imported into a surface evaluation program to assess 3D deviations and measure distances between implants. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Precision was assessed as the difference between files (Kruskal–Wallis test), while trueness was assessed from the difference between scans, applying the Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: As for the 3D deviations, SI showed accuracy, for the faces and positions of the implants in relation to the SE, in both scanning methods (P < 0.05). Regarding the capture of distances between implants, the SD scan obtained better trueness than the SB group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the type and scanning methods used did not influence the 3D deviations, while for distances, scanning with the device had better trueness. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9416955/ /pubmed/36511059 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro Segundo, Henrique Vieira Melo Júnior, Luiz Carlos Alves Germano, Adriano Rocha Carreiro, Adriana Da Fonte Porto Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
title | Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
title_full | Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
title_fullStr | Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
title_short | Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
title_sort | accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511059 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraanalarissecarneiro accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods AT segundohenriquevieiramelo accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods AT juniorluizcarlosalves accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods AT germanoadrianorocha accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods AT carreiroadrianadafonteporto accuracybetweenintraoralandextraoralscanningthreedimensionaldeviationandeffectofdistancebetweenimplantsfromtwoscanningmethods |