Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial

AIMS: The study aims to find out the best possible method of cleaning the removable partial denture (RPD) by evaluating the Candida count limiting ability in RPD users using three different cleaning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present study is randomized controlled trial. Three groups were for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajendran, Arun, George, Roshy, Mathew, Nicholas, Ranjith, M., Nazar, N Abu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_553_21
_version_ 1784776592041443328
author Rajendran, Arun
George, Roshy
Mathew, Nicholas
Ranjith, M.
Nazar, N Abu
author_facet Rajendran, Arun
George, Roshy
Mathew, Nicholas
Ranjith, M.
Nazar, N Abu
author_sort Rajendran, Arun
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The study aims to find out the best possible method of cleaning the removable partial denture (RPD) by evaluating the Candida count limiting ability in RPD users using three different cleaning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present study is randomized controlled trial. Three groups were formed with 20 participants in each. The groups were Group 1 RPD cleansing done using sterile saline and denture brush (negative control group), Group 2 RPD cleansing done using soap and denture brush and Group 3 RPD cleansing done using denture cleansing tablet and denture brush. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A baseline data and 15 days’ postinsertion data of Candida count was recorded using swab collection, from the RPDs given. The swab was collected, cultured, and incubated using standard methods. Once Candida was identified using Sabouraud's dextrose agar, Candida albicans was further confirmed using germ tube test and cornmeal agar. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The analysis was done using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Paired t-test, was used to compare the number of colonies pre and postintervention. The difference between the groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc analysis. RESULTS: The comparison of baseline data and postintervention data within each group using paired t test demonstrated statistically significant values; P = 0.046 and 0.000 in Group 2 and 3 respectively. The difference between the Candida colonies in three different groups after the intervention (15 Days) was analyzed using analysis of variance and found to be statistically significant with P = 0.004. Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to analyze the difference between the groups. It was concurred that there was a statistically significant difference between all three groups, but the difference in the mean was highest between the Group 1 and 3 (1210.99). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, it is concluded that the use of denture cleansers and brush on a daily basis would actively reduce the number of C. albicans colony formation in RPD and thereby improve the overall health of denture wearer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9416958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94169582023-07-01 Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial Rajendran, Arun George, Roshy Mathew, Nicholas Ranjith, M. Nazar, N Abu J Indian Prosthodont Soc Research AIMS: The study aims to find out the best possible method of cleaning the removable partial denture (RPD) by evaluating the Candida count limiting ability in RPD users using three different cleaning methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present study is randomized controlled trial. Three groups were formed with 20 participants in each. The groups were Group 1 RPD cleansing done using sterile saline and denture brush (negative control group), Group 2 RPD cleansing done using soap and denture brush and Group 3 RPD cleansing done using denture cleansing tablet and denture brush. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A baseline data and 15 days’ postinsertion data of Candida count was recorded using swab collection, from the RPDs given. The swab was collected, cultured, and incubated using standard methods. Once Candida was identified using Sabouraud's dextrose agar, Candida albicans was further confirmed using germ tube test and cornmeal agar. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The analysis was done using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Paired t-test, was used to compare the number of colonies pre and postintervention. The difference between the groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc analysis. RESULTS: The comparison of baseline data and postintervention data within each group using paired t test demonstrated statistically significant values; P = 0.046 and 0.000 in Group 2 and 3 respectively. The difference between the Candida colonies in three different groups after the intervention (15 Days) was analyzed using analysis of variance and found to be statistically significant with P = 0.004. Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to analyze the difference between the groups. It was concurred that there was a statistically significant difference between all three groups, but the difference in the mean was highest between the Group 1 and 3 (1210.99). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, it is concluded that the use of denture cleansers and brush on a daily basis would actively reduce the number of C. albicans colony formation in RPD and thereby improve the overall health of denture wearer. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9416958/ /pubmed/36511055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_553_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research
Rajendran, Arun
George, Roshy
Mathew, Nicholas
Ranjith, M.
Nazar, N Abu
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial
title Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing Candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy of three different denture cleansing methods in reducing candida albicans count in removable partial denture wearers: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_553_21
work_keys_str_mv AT rajendranarun comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentdenturecleansingmethodsinreducingcandidaalbicanscountinremovablepartialdenturewearersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT georgeroshy comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentdenturecleansingmethodsinreducingcandidaalbicanscountinremovablepartialdenturewearersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mathewnicholas comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentdenturecleansingmethodsinreducingcandidaalbicanscountinremovablepartialdenturewearersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ranjithm comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentdenturecleansingmethodsinreducingcandidaalbicanscountinremovablepartialdenturewearersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nazarnabu comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentdenturecleansingmethodsinreducingcandidaalbicanscountinremovablepartialdenturewearersarandomizedcontrolledtrial