Cargando…
Peer review: Risk and risk tolerance
Peer review, commonly used in grant funding decisions, relies on scientists’ ability to evaluate research proposals’ quality. Such judgments are sometimes beyond reviewers’ discriminatory power and could lead to a reliance on subjective biases, including preferences for lower risk, incremental proje...
Autores principales: | Gallo, Stephen A., Schmaling, Karen B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9417194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36026494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273813 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Schmaling, Karen B., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Couples and COVID-19 vaccination: Frequency and reasons for discordance
por: Schmaling, Karen B.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)