Cargando…
Does gold behaves as hydrogen? A joint theoretical and experimental study
It has been established that the noble-metal–H analogue has been found in a large number of noble-metal–ligand clusters in view of geometric and electronic structures. Here, we demonstrated a different view of noble-metal–H analogue between noble-metal and hydrogen in M(SCH(3))(2)(−) (M = Cu, Ag, Au...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
RSC
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36133220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9na00780f |
Sumario: | It has been established that the noble-metal–H analogue has been found in a large number of noble-metal–ligand clusters in view of geometric and electronic structures. Here, we demonstrated a different view of noble-metal–H analogue between noble-metal and hydrogen in M(SCH(3))(2)(−) (M = Cu, Ag, Au and H) systems. Although H(SCH(3))(2)(−) is a typical ion-hydrogen bonding cluster dramatically different from the chemical bonding clusters of M(SCH(3))(2)(−) (M = Cu, Ag and Au), the comparison of the two typical bonding patterns has not yet been fully investigated. Through a series of chemical bonding analyses, it is indicated that the evolution has been exhibited from typical ionic bonding in Cu(SCH(3))(2)(−) to a significant covalent bonding nature in Au(SCH(3))(2)(−) and hydrogen bonding dominating in H(SCH(3))(2)(−). The comparison of M(SCH(3))(2)(−) (M = Cu, Ag and Au) with H(SCH(3))(2)(−) illustrates the differences in bonding between noble metals and hydrogen, which are mainly related to their diverse atomic orbitals participating in chemical bonding. |
---|