Cargando…

Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bistolfi, Alessandro, Giustra, Fortunato, Bosco, Francesco, Faccenda, Carlotta, Viotto, Marianna, Sabatini, Luigi, Berchialla, Paola, Sciannameo, Veronica, Graziano, Eugenio, Massè, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7
_version_ 1784776911894872064
author Bistolfi, Alessandro
Giustra, Fortunato
Bosco, Francesco
Faccenda, Carlotta
Viotto, Marianna
Sabatini, Luigi
Berchialla, Paola
Sciannameo, Veronica
Graziano, Eugenio
Massè, Alessandro
author_facet Bistolfi, Alessandro
Giustra, Fortunato
Bosco, Francesco
Faccenda, Carlotta
Viotto, Marianna
Sabatini, Luigi
Berchialla, Paola
Sciannameo, Veronica
Graziano, Eugenio
Massè, Alessandro
author_sort Bistolfi, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-term survival and performance in total hip arthroplasty; nevertheless, this superiority is not demonstrated in TKA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether HXLPE improved overall survival and postoperative functional and radiological outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in TKA. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a literature search of five databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase) was made. A PICOS model was performed. The initial screening identified 2541 studies. Each eligible clinical article was analysed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence (LoE). Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of LoE 1 and 2 were included. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. RESULTS: Six clinical studies were included in the final study. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 2285 knees were included. Eight outcomes (total reoperations, reoperations for prosthesis loosening and infections, radiolucent lines, osteolysis, mechanical failure, postoperative KSS knee score and function score) were analysed. For none of them, a statistically significant difference was found about the superiority of HXLPE over CPE (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between HXLPE and CPE for TKA concerning clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes; nevertheless, HXLPE did not show higher failure rates or complications and can be safely used for TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9418273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94182732022-08-28 Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials Bistolfi, Alessandro Giustra, Fortunato Bosco, Francesco Faccenda, Carlotta Viotto, Marianna Sabatini, Luigi Berchialla, Paola Sciannameo, Veronica Graziano, Eugenio Massè, Alessandro Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-term survival and performance in total hip arthroplasty; nevertheless, this superiority is not demonstrated in TKA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether HXLPE improved overall survival and postoperative functional and radiological outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in TKA. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a literature search of five databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase) was made. A PICOS model was performed. The initial screening identified 2541 studies. Each eligible clinical article was analysed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence (LoE). Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of LoE 1 and 2 were included. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. RESULTS: Six clinical studies were included in the final study. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 2285 knees were included. Eight outcomes (total reoperations, reoperations for prosthesis loosening and infections, radiolucent lines, osteolysis, mechanical failure, postoperative KSS knee score and function score) were analysed. For none of them, a statistically significant difference was found about the superiority of HXLPE over CPE (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between HXLPE and CPE for TKA concerning clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes; nevertheless, HXLPE did not show higher failure rates or complications and can be safely used for TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9418273/ /pubmed/35182171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee
Bistolfi, Alessandro
Giustra, Fortunato
Bosco, Francesco
Faccenda, Carlotta
Viotto, Marianna
Sabatini, Luigi
Berchialla, Paola
Sciannameo, Veronica
Graziano, Eugenio
Massè, Alessandro
Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_full Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_fullStr Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_short Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_sort comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bistolfialessandro comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT giustrafortunato comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT boscofrancesco comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT faccendacarlotta comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT viottomarianna comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT sabatiniluigi comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT berchiallapaola comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT sciannameoveronica comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT grazianoeugenio comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT massealessandro comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials