Cargando…
Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7 |
_version_ | 1784776911894872064 |
---|---|
author | Bistolfi, Alessandro Giustra, Fortunato Bosco, Francesco Faccenda, Carlotta Viotto, Marianna Sabatini, Luigi Berchialla, Paola Sciannameo, Veronica Graziano, Eugenio Massè, Alessandro |
author_facet | Bistolfi, Alessandro Giustra, Fortunato Bosco, Francesco Faccenda, Carlotta Viotto, Marianna Sabatini, Luigi Berchialla, Paola Sciannameo, Veronica Graziano, Eugenio Massè, Alessandro |
author_sort | Bistolfi, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-term survival and performance in total hip arthroplasty; nevertheless, this superiority is not demonstrated in TKA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether HXLPE improved overall survival and postoperative functional and radiological outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in TKA. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a literature search of five databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase) was made. A PICOS model was performed. The initial screening identified 2541 studies. Each eligible clinical article was analysed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence (LoE). Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of LoE 1 and 2 were included. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. RESULTS: Six clinical studies were included in the final study. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 2285 knees were included. Eight outcomes (total reoperations, reoperations for prosthesis loosening and infections, radiolucent lines, osteolysis, mechanical failure, postoperative KSS knee score and function score) were analysed. For none of them, a statistically significant difference was found about the superiority of HXLPE over CPE (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between HXLPE and CPE for TKA concerning clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes; nevertheless, HXLPE did not show higher failure rates or complications and can be safely used for TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9418273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94182732022-08-28 Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials Bistolfi, Alessandro Giustra, Fortunato Bosco, Francesco Faccenda, Carlotta Viotto, Marianna Sabatini, Luigi Berchialla, Paola Sciannameo, Veronica Graziano, Eugenio Massè, Alessandro Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-term survival and performance in total hip arthroplasty; nevertheless, this superiority is not demonstrated in TKA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether HXLPE improved overall survival and postoperative functional and radiological outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in TKA. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a literature search of five databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase) was made. A PICOS model was performed. The initial screening identified 2541 studies. Each eligible clinical article was analysed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence (LoE). Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of LoE 1 and 2 were included. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. RESULTS: Six clinical studies were included in the final study. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 2285 knees were included. Eight outcomes (total reoperations, reoperations for prosthesis loosening and infections, radiolucent lines, osteolysis, mechanical failure, postoperative KSS knee score and function score) were analysed. For none of them, a statistically significant difference was found about the superiority of HXLPE over CPE (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between HXLPE and CPE for TKA concerning clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes; nevertheless, HXLPE did not show higher failure rates or complications and can be safely used for TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9418273/ /pubmed/35182171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Knee Bistolfi, Alessandro Giustra, Fortunato Bosco, Francesco Faccenda, Carlotta Viotto, Marianna Sabatini, Luigi Berchialla, Paola Sciannameo, Veronica Graziano, Eugenio Massè, Alessandro Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title | Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_full | Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_short | Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_sort | comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
topic | Knee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bistolfialessandro comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT giustrafortunato comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT boscofrancesco comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT faccendacarlotta comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT viottomarianna comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT sabatiniluigi comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT berchiallapaola comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT sciannameoveronica comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT grazianoeugenio comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT massealessandro comparableresultsbetweencrosslinkedpolyethyleneandconventionalultrahighmolecularweightpolyethyleneimplantedintotalkneearthroplastysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials |