Cargando…

Countermovement jump, handgrip, and balance performance change during euhydration, mild-dehydration, rehydration, and ad libitum drinking

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of euhydration, mild-dehydration, rehydration, and ad libitum drinking on countermovement jump (CMJ), handgrip strength, and performance of balance error scoring system test (BESS). METHODS: Eighteen healthy male subjects (mean[M]±standard deviation[SD]; age, 23±3y;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekiguchi, Yasuki, Giersch, Gabrielle E.W., Jordan, Danielle R., Dunn, Leslie, Fiol, Aidan, Lopez, Virgilio, Armstrong, Lawrence E., Casa, Douglas J., Lee, Elaine C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2022.07.003
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of euhydration, mild-dehydration, rehydration, and ad libitum drinking on countermovement jump (CMJ), handgrip strength, and performance of balance error scoring system test (BESS). METHODS: Eighteen healthy male subjects (mean[M]±standard deviation[SD]; age, 23±3y; body mass, 80.1 ± 9.7 kg; height, 175.8 ± 5.7 cm) participated in this study. Participants reported to the laboratory to perform CMJ, handgrip strength, and BESS with different hydration statuses (euhydrated, EUH; when they initially sensed thirst, THIRST; dehydrated, DEH; following 30 minutes of rehydration, REH; and following 24-h ad libitum drinking, AD). RESULTS: CMJ at EUH (M±SD; 54.6 ± 3.0 cm) was significantly higher than DEH (52.8 ± 3.0 cm, p = 0.027) and REH (52.6 ± 2.8 cm, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference between DEH and REH (p = 0.643). CMJ at THIRST (54.9 ± 3.0 cm, p = 0.004) was higher than REH. Also, AD (53.8 ± 2.8 cm, p = 0.027) was higher than REH. In left handgrip strength, THIRST (48.6 ± 9.5 kg) was higher than EUH (46.7 ± 10.1 kg, p = 0.018), DEH (45.8 ± 10.0 kg, p = 0.013), REH (46.1 ± 9.5 kg, p = 0.004), and AD (47.1 ± 9.7 kg, p = 0.05). Additionally, in the single-leg stance on a foam pad, more BESS errors were found at THIRST (6 ± 2) compared to EUH (5 ± 2, p = 0.007) and AD (5 ± 2, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study were: ∼2% of mild dehydration induced by 24-h fluid restriction decreased lower body power measured by CMJ, acute rehydration did not restore the loss of lower body power induced by dehydration, and ∼0.5–0.9% of dehydration did not decrease lower body power.